Breaking news

Strong indications that beheaded soldier is a terrorist incident – Cameron

Measure B passed: Adult film actors forced to wear condoms on set

Published time: November 08, 2012 08:45
Edited time: November 08, 2012 12:45
Reuters / Daniel Munoz

Los Angeles County voters have passed a law requiring actors in adult movies to wear condoms while performing on set. US porn film producers are outraged, and are planning to go to court to challenge the decision, calling the law “unconstitutional”.

­The Free Speech Coalition, hailing itself as "the adult product and entertainment industry's trade association," said forcing actors to wear condoms would make porn filmmaking "untenable", AFP reported.

America’s multi-million dollar adult film industry is largely based in Los Angeles and fears fewer viewers would want to see porn films with actors using condoms.

"Therefore we will file suit and challenge this intolerable law in court," The Free Speech Coalition said in a letter following a referendum measure.

"The law, as passed, is untenable for adult production," it emphasized.

The AIDS Healthcare Foundation, meanwhile, has welcomed the result in which 55.9 percent of voters backed the condom-use proposal.

According to AFP, LA County voters backed the condom initiative after campaigners collected over 360,000 signatures to force the issue onto the ballot on the same day as White House and Congressional elections and over 170 state-wide polls.

Last year, leading porn producers had to stop filming for nearly a week after a performer tested positive for HIV. The Free Speech Coalition said, however, the case was later determined to have been a false report.

In 2010, porn actor Derrick Burts was confirmed as HIV-positive which also halting production, and in 2004 at least five performers tested positive prompting another moratorium.

Comments (7)

feelgood (unregistered) 09.11.2012 12:07

I've given up ever trying to comment on RT stories relating to sex, because I have to spend the next hour trying to discover what proper sexual term is deemed too "obscene" to have in my comment. It's rather funny, but also rather sad. It does remind me that Russia is indeed a different place.

In any case, I was only trying to explain that yes, the measure will easily be found unconstitutional in a court of law. You can't single out one little part of society like that, no matter if it's for health reasons or forcing your political message.

+1

Undo

Dean (unregistered) 09.11.2012 06:34

The reason some people tested positive for a disease is more likely because of their proclivity towardssex outside of their job.Being in an industry where you tend to have sex, meansyou are more open to dangerous encounters outside of your professed profession. In other terms, you enjoy having sex and therefore are more likely to get the disease.  Condoms would not have prevented this outbreak and therefore the law is ridiculous.

+1

Undo

Rojo (unregistered) 09.11.2012 03:56

Bravo RT, this invaluable information really belongs to Art & Culture....

+1

Undo

View all comments (7)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us