Court passes guilty verdict in Russian art vs. religion case
Published: 12 July, 2010, 09:28
Edited: 29 July, 2010, 18:06
TAGS: Art, Crime, Religion, Scandal, Russia
On Monday a court in Moscow delivered its guilty verdict to the organizers of the Forbidden Art exhibition, who were facing charges of inciting religious hatred by putting controversial pictures on public display.
Yury Samodurov, the ex-director of the museum where the exhibition took place, and Andrey Erofeev, the former Head of the Tretyakov Gallery’s modern trends department, were fined about $6500 and $5000 respectively. The Prosecutor’s Office was seeking a three year prison sentence for both defendants for exhibiting “images which are derogatory and insulting to Christianity and religious people.”
Samodurov has been convicted of similar charges before. In March, 2005, the court ordered him to pay a fine of approximately $3500.
On Tuesday the defense appealed to a higher court to have the sentence overturned, advisor Ksenia Kostromina told the media.
The exhibition "Forbidden Art – 2006" was shown in 2007 and displayed pictures previously banned from other Moscow galleries. The works showed religious images and symbols combined with everyday, popular culture objects. Among other controversial things, the visitors could see Jesus Christ with the head of Mickey Mouse, and a Muslim Marilyn Monroe. Some exhibits contained abusive language.
The trial caused controversy in society.
The church community was not unanimous about the sentence, but did not doubt the fact that the defendants are guilty.
“It was not the Church that initiated this prosecution, but people who were offended. The investigation proved that the art pieces at this exhibit were offensive towards believers and incited religious hatred to an extent,” says Father Georgy Roshin.
Artists and humans rights activists – as well as the directors of the Tretyakov Gallery and the State Center of Modern Art – were protesting against the trial, saying the trial is not about art, rather about politics, censorship and a curb on the freedom of expression.
“I think that neither artists, nor curators, nor art in general should be punished under criminal law. Often people see in pictures something that the artist did not have in mind at all. Time also matters, and the next generation will not understand at all what the conflict was about,” said director general of the Tretyakov Gallery Irina Lebedeva in her interview to news agency Interfax. She pointed out that she herself had professional disputes with Erofeev, but noted that a creative person cannot be strictly controlled.
“I think that this trial was premeditated. It was staged, and those believers who took part in it in fact never saw these pieces of art before,” says Aleksandr, an artist and a protestor. “Most likely it is an attempt to apply censorship to art and to once again create a tense and hostile environment in the social and cultural sphere. Art is a field where things are allowed. Experiments are going on in museums, in restricted areas. It doesn’t harm the public. If anyone disagrees, they are free not to watch, or give a verbal or any other kind of response,” he added.
On Monday the court room was not the only scene of events. According to media reports, those protesting against the trial brought a shoebox full of giant cockroaches and let them creep into the building while opponents of controversial exhibition were chanting religious songs outside the court.
However, journalist and writer Dmitry Bykov says the fine handed down to the organizers is fair.
“I’m quite sure that this decision is really modest and really honest, because it could be much worse – the orthodox fundamentalists are really very dangerous. They insisted on real punishment connected with imprisonment,” he emphasized.
Avignon Theatre Festival opens Chekhov exhibitionThe Avignon Theatre Festival is paying tribute to the great Russian writer Anton Chekhov by opening a major exhibition in his honor. |
Fire at Moscow art center kills two, damages artifactsA large fire at an art restoration centre in central Moscow has killed two firefighters and damaged a large collection of paintings and icons. |
Suppose we add some more artistic expressions, for instance red or yellow star stuffed up with swastika, and we call it art…what would the verdict be? To further simplify: the people and their expressive part society have vacancy in the sane structure of normal life. If anyone wants to move as the part of the people-and-society – he or she have enough place in the very vacancy. So they can lift their banners, believes or mark their identities. But, why to misuse this vacancy or sane permeability of any state, lifting artistic banners against those harboring identity in Christianity or any other religion? Harboring consciously, unconsciously, traditionally and emotionally. The government or judiciary system can’t comfortably identify with anyone’s art that is ridiculing him or her. It is even not satiric. It is building up the political field for further exploitation and demands intervention against blunt proselytism, being no art at all. Stalin already modernized Russia removing one traditional regulator but in spite anchored Russia as the permanent historic target for western political fluid aggressively coagulating on Russian soil. Are we now back to the re-modernization turn?
Well this story allows many in Western Europe to feel smug. While a majority of American's might go to church regularly. In England its less than ten percent of the population. And still declining. And across much of Europe religion is identified with obscurantist nonsense marketed for people who find science intellectually challenging. And here the the parables of Christianity have same force as the Greek myths. On the other hand the political repression involved allows an association to be made with the developments in other regions and religions. Islam in Pakistan and Afghanistan for instance. During the chaos of the 1990's in Russia the Russian Church may have provided some service in maintaining national integrity. But if the aim of the Russian elites is the transformation and modernization of Russia then reactionary iconography makes a bad template.












So much for freedom of speech and freedom of expression! Usually, only countries with some kind of unstabile religious/ethnic population, or those with goverment seeking complete control over "moral values" inact laws and pass judgements that would otherwise be null and void in other countries, and Russia is no exception. a-la Homeland Security-type monitoring of all communications, laws prohibiting freedom of speech, historical revisionism, laws enforcing gag-policies even on message board and comment areas (thats why comments on RT are pre-screened)... wayt, they may have forgotten RFID`ng its population and installing at least as many cameras as they have in London, but hey - it`s a developing economy, not all can be done at once! Big players from times far in the past, now with a nice suit and a pr-managed message. Passing themselves as "civil" and "democratic"...