Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.

 

Pakistan censors release of US drama about Osama bin Laden

Published time: January 30, 2013 11:40
Edited time: January 30, 2013 15:40
Zero Dark Thirty (Image from kinopoisk.ru)

Movie distributors and TV stations in Pakistan won't be screening the Oscar-nominated US drama about the hunt for Osama bin Laden to avoid offending local sensibilities and provoke outrage in the conservative country.

­The unofficial censorship has also prompted by local cable distributors blocking the screening of the hit US dramas "Homeland" and "Last Resort", on the grounds they are against the national interest, AFP reported.

"We have not and neither has anyone else bought Zero Dark Thirty," a representative for film distribution company Cinepax, Mohsin Yaseen, was quoted as saying. "It has several scenes which could make us feel humiliated. It is against the interests of the Pakistani nation," he told AFP.

Last year, on 29 December, Pakistan lifted its YouTube ban to bring it back only three minutes later, after what was officially deemed as "blasphemous content" turned out to be still accessible. The ban was originally imposed in September, in response to YouTube's screening of The Innocence of Muslims anti-Islamic video.

Zero Dark Thirty (Image from kinopoisk.ru)
Zero Dark Thirty (Image from kinopoisk.ru)

­The Pakistan Telecommunication Authority has banned access to YouTube a number of times, as well as prohibiting access to Facebook and limiting access to Wikipedia.

While "Zero Dark Thirty" has scooped five Oscar nominations in America, in Pakistan the operation to kill bin Laden is perceived as one of the darkest pages in the country's history.

US Navy SEALS killed al-Qaeda leader Osama Bin Laden at his compound in Pakistan on May 4, 2011. Pakistan considered that attack a “violation of its territorial integrity and sovereignty.”

Homeland (Image from kinopoisk.ru)
Homeland (Image from kinopoisk.ru)

­The company which has the rights in Pakistan to cable channel Star World, Max Media, has also reportedly refused to transmit "Homeland" and the military drama "Last Resort".

"We strongly believe that programmes such as 'Homeland' and 'Last Resort' are against our national interest, cultural values and ideology," an official at Max Media who did not want to be named, told AFP, adding that "a vague reference about Islam can ignite violence in Pakistan".

With pirated DVDs in abundance in Pakistan, "Zero Dark Thirty", "Homeland" and "Last Resort" are said to be among the best-selling titles.

Comments (17)

Rubin Schmidt (unregistered) 04.02.2013 20:08

karen (unregistered) wrote in #11
the rest of the world wont ever know the truth...they are no exception Oh no.! Some of us saw a 16 ft. hole in the Penagon, supposedly made by the fibre glass nosecone of an airliner, what I saw was a missile blast through 3, three foot thick, steel reinforced walls. Norman Minetta, in his statement to the 9/11 commission, confirmed that Cheney got a 50-30-10 countdown, but would not order an intercept. Americans tend to see what their told their seeing.!!!

0

Undo

Yousafzai (unregistered) 31.01.2013 23:53

With millions of dollars at their disposal, I wonder why the makers of this film couldn’t hire even a most basic advisor to inform them that1: Pakistanis speak Urdu, English and other regional languages and NOT Arabic;2: Pakistani men do not go around wearing 17th and 18th century headgear in markets;3: The only Urdu heard in the film is from a group of wild-eyed men protesting against an American diplomat, calling him ‘chor.’ Chor i n Urdu means robber. And the protest rally was against US drone strikes. How did that make the diplomat a chor?4: And how on earth was a green Mercedes packed with armed men parked only a few feet away from the US embassy in Islamabad? Haven’t the producers ever heard of an area called the Diplomatic Enclave in Islamabad? Even a squirrel these days has to run around for a permit to enter and climb trees in that particular area.

0

Undo

roslan bayu (unregistered) 31.01.2013 19:42

It was not Osama but house owner. Reasons. 1. No dialysis was found in house or during demolition. 2. as a very sick man, he would hire at least one nurse to take care. 3. Osama is a discipline man, he will not live in a house for 6 years with electrical wires danggling in his tv room, fire hazard. the end.

0

Undo

View all comments (17)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us