Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.

 

­Victoria's Secret offends Native Americans with fashion show look

Published time: November 13, 2012 14:11
Edited time: November 13, 2012 18:11
US model Karlie Kloss wears a native American Indian outfit during the 2012 Victoria's Secret fashion show November 7, 2012 in New York (AFP Photo / Timothy A. Clary)

Lingerie giant Victoria's Secret has apologized to the Native American community over the Indian culture inspired look at its fashion show.

An outfit decorated with a feathered headdress, turquoise jewelry and a fringed belt was worn by model Karlie Kloss during last week’s fashion show. The look caused criticism from the Native American community and the brand’s customers, CBS News reports.

The lingerie brand rushed to apologize for the offense and promised to pull the look from the upcoming TV-broadcast.

"We are sorry that the Native American headdress replica used in our recent fashion show has upset individuals,"
the statement said. "We sincerely apologize as we absolutely had no intention to offend anyone. Out of respect, we will not be including the outfit in any broadcast, marketing materials nor in any other way."

The model also issued an apology on her Twitter page.

“I am deeply sorry if what I wore during the VS Show offended anyone. I support VS's decision to remove the outfit from the broadcast.”

Another similar case sparkled in the USA last week when pop band No Doubt led by Gwen Stefani withdrew the video to their new single "Looking Hot" after complaints from the Native American community.

The Cowboys and Indians themed video featured two band members posing as cowboys capturing Gwen depicting an Indian princess.

The band also issued an apology saying their “intention was never to offend, hurt or trivialize Native American people, their culture or their history."

Comments (7)

landofthefree 23.11.2012 05:14

you mean the organisers didn't consider the possible implications of this before the show?! talk about dumb...

0

Undo

KB (unregistered) 15.11.2012 02:35

TWO IMPORTANT POINTS: 1) The Washington Redskins refuse to change their name even though "redskin" is the equivalent of calling a Native American the "N" word. Imagine if instead of Redskins, we called the team the "Popes", and at halftime someone dressed in the sacred garments and headgear of the Catholic Pope, dancing up & down the field swinging a crucifix up in the air in a circle around his head like a cowboy's lasso, while he was flinging sacred communion wafers out to the crowd as a snack? When Catholics ask this team to stop using their religious leaders as team mascots, would you still say "Why do Catholics see this as an insult?"
2) You can't tell another person how to say "ouch". Haven't we already taken enough from Native Americans - now you want to take away their right as adult human beings to decide when they are offended by what they determine to be a desecration of their sacred religious symbols?
Please take a moment to give some serious consideration to these two important points...

0

Undo

zzz (unregistered) 13.11.2012 23:47

It took me about 5 seconds to notice that thing she was wearing on her head.

+2

Undo

View all comments (7)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us