Internet song sharing woman loses appeal and is fined $9,000 per track

Published time: September 12, 2012 15:27
Edited time: September 12, 2012 19:27
AFP Photo / Martin Bureau

An American woman from Minnesota accused of sharing songs online will have to pay for her passion for downloading. A Federal appeals court has ruled she owes record companies $222,000 for willful copyright infringement.

­The industry presented evidence that Jammie Thomas-Rasset made available over 1,700 songs to other computer users via the file sharing service Kazaa, though the lawsuit targeted only 24 songs.

The woman's case appears to be one of only two lawsuits to go to trial out of more than 30,000 filed by the recording industry, The Associated Press reported.

"We are pleased with the appellate court's decision and look forward to putting this case behind us," the Recording Industry Association of America said in a statement.

A three judge appeals panel reversed a lower court's ruling in the long-running lawsuit over music downloading, concluding that Chief U.S. District Judge Michael Davis was wrong when he cut the award against Thomas-Rasset to $54,000.

Juries reportedly ruled against the woman in three separate trials since the industry first sued her back in 2006. Davis said the last award, of $1.5 million, was "severe and oppressive."

However, according to the appeals court, the high award was not unreasonable. It sent the case back to Chief U.S. District Judge for an order that she pay $222,000, as well as an injunction barring her from making the plaintiffs' recordings available to the public via online media distribution systems.

Thomas-Rasset said she plans to appeal for as long as her attorneys remain with her. She revealed she can't afford to pay though.

Her attorney confirmed they would ask the Supreme Court to hear the case, describing the $222,000 award as punitive.

Comments (8)

jesse_a_b 13.09.2012 12:26

One more reason I will never pay give a single penny to a recording company.

0

Undo

Brasivnika 13.09.2012 05:22

The corporations made an example of that poor woman. They know full well that she doesn't have any money. They've just destroyed this person's life to deter others. Well, it is obvious that their scare-tactics aren't working. They're no longer in control. 

We must remember that it was the corporations that first put a financial-lid on music. Beforehand it was free, beautiful, creative, and open to everyone. Now see what greed has twisted it into? We resort to semi-illegal downloading, and every now and then some average Joe pulls a short straw and gets his life taken away from him. This sort of thing is what happens in Capitalism. This here example is but a superficial taste.

Now American homes can be wire-tapped without a warrant and the UK is installing cameras in bathrooms and changing rooms. What is the west turning into, a communistic mass of Zionist states?

+2

Undo

alephfool (unregistered) 13.09.2012 04:37

Youtube shares copyrighted audio/video files all the time, why have they not found themselves in court ? I am guessing that there are more downloads from utube than from many torrent sites.

+1

Undo

View all comments (8)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us