Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.

 

‘Good value for money?’ UK monarchy increases spending to £35.7mn in 2013

Published time: June 26, 2014 10:21
Edited time: June 27, 2014 14:17
Britain's Queen Elizabeth II (Reuters / Andrew Winning)

Britain's Queen Elizabeth II (Reuters / Andrew Winning)

Taxpayer funding for the British royal family reached £35.7 million last year, as the Queen’s expenses rose by £1.9 million, or nearly 6 percent , as the so-called ‘commoners’ grapple with the hardships of recovery.

The figure works out to 56 pence per person, less than $1, which royal aides have said is a "good value for money.”

The Queen’s accounts are kept solvent by the Sovereign Grant, a fund to pay for royal expenditure such as transportation, employee salaries, and keeping palaces in good condition. Previously, the UK royal family were funded by the Civil List, and separate grants were made for travel and property maintenance to the Queen and other royals in active state roles.

In real terms, Queen Elizabeth’s finances increase by even more - £2.4 million from the previous year.

One of the largest property owners in the UK the royal family increased its budget to look after its palaces by £4.2 million to £13.3 million, or a 45 percent increase to cover what they consider a ‘backlog’ of restoration projects.

Source: screenshot from the www.independent.co.uk

Included in the backlog is refurbishing crumbling and leaky royal residences, including Buckingham Palace, which has an outdated and expensive heating system that runs a near £800,000 heating bill per year.

Kensington Palace had to be "completely re-serviced” last April to rid it of old building materials that cause lung cancer. Over the last two years, £4.5 million has been spent on refurbishing the 20 bedroom apartment, which also houses Prince Charles and his family. The royal family footed the bill for interior design themselves.

Last December, Prince Charles, the eldest son of the Queen, spent £255,000 to attend Nelson Mandela's memorial in South Africa.

Last year, the public funds allotted to the Queen’s pocketbook reached £32 million, a figure that includes the extra £1 million to put on the Diamond Jubilee celebration.

Although the family is historically one of the country’s wealthiest, they claim that the reserve fund has been emptied, and that they only have £1 million left, compared to the £35 million in 2001. The family blames poor financial management on the Treasury.

The estimated total annual cost of the monarchy is £299.4 million, around nine times the official figure published by the royal household as reported by anti-monarchy campaigners.

Britain’s economy re-entered recession in 2012, the first double-dip recession since 1975. The economy is showing signs of healthy growth including unemployment at 6.6 percent, passing the governments’ goal of 7 percent. But darker days may lay ahead with a housing bubble on the brink of bursting and a massive trade deficit.

Comments (42)

 

Riz 28.06.2014 17:18

Steven Jefferson 27.06.2014 11:45

And before anyone trots out the old "we need the royal family because they bring in the tourists" rubbish, bear in mind that tourists would certainly come in their millions to see the cells that the ex-royal-family had been incarcerated in, or the walls they'd been stood up against to be shot, or the coal mines they'd been sent down to learn an honest trade.

  


100+

 

Riz 28.06.2014 17:17

LSean 27.06.2014 07:08

The Monarch legally acquired these lands, you can't just take them from her. Unlike the French, who saw that the Monarch had taken their lands, so reclaimed them. The British Monarch purchased the lands and built them up using the money which the family had saved up (before George III, so no Parliamentary involvement).

V ersailles doesn't get anywhere near the tourism interest as British destinations as it is not still a royal residence.

  


Le gally? you got to be kidding me, they murdered and stole to where they got now.

 

Steven Jefferson 27.06.2014 11:45

And before anyone trots out the old "we need the royal family because they bring in the tourists" rubbish, bear in mind that tourists would certainly come in their millions to see the cells that the ex-royal-family had been incarcerated in, or the walls they'd been stood up against to be shot, or the coal mines they'd been sent down to learn an honest trade.

View all comments (42)
Add comment

Authorization required for adding comments

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

OK

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

X

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us

Follow us