Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.


Catastrophic predictions: Lloyd's insurer, Oxford team up to improve modelling

Published time: February 10, 2014 12:59
Edited time: February 10, 2014 13:51
AFP Photo / Ben Stansall

AFP Photo / Ben Stansall

Oxford University and Amlin, one of the biggest independent insurers at Lloyd’s of London , are to jointly study the reliability of the existing models that predict natural disasters. Improved prediction could reduce huge insurance company losses.

Amlin together with Oxford’s Future of Humanity Institute are teaming up for a three year research of catastrophe modeling, the Financial Times (FT) reports.

Simon Beale, Amlin’s chief underwriting officer, called the undertaking an important step in “ensuring that our reliance on the increasing amalgamation of models does not prove catastrophic for the insurance industry.”

Regulators have already labeled the plan as “systematically important”, which will lead to higher capital control.

Since catastrophic models emerged in the 1990s they have gradually begun to play a greater role in understanding the scale of losses the insuring company will need to carry to cover catastrophes.

The prediction models bundle scientific disciplines like climatology and seismology. The assessment of property values endangered by natural disasters such as hurricanes and earthquakes, have forced insurers to spend millions of dollars a year on research.

Huge capital investment in modeling does not guarantee accurate risk assessments, such as Thailand’s flood 3 years ago which cost much more than insurers’ estimates, partly because they were inadequately modeled.

The use of computer models during the 2008 financial crisis was more reliable. Mr Beale draws a parallel with financial markets, “but we are, perhaps equally, vulnerable to such scenarios, where modeled expectations of risk do not reflect reality and, or, modeled output is taken for granted,” said the chief underwriting officer, adding that “Amlin recognises this threat to its business, but also to the insurance market as a whole.”

While insurance companies try to use the knowledge and experience of individual underwriters, rather than computer predictions, investment funds which are buying so-called catastrophe bonds, and some alternative sources of capital, are completely reliant on models.

Comments (1)


Wulirider 10.02.2014 14:19

As Catherine Austin Fitts, a financial adviser, points out, how does or does the model include man-made disasters used as cold war weapons, weather weapons for if they do not, these are material omissions and dis-ingenuous.

Add comment

Authorization required for adding comments

Register or



Show password


or Register

Request a new password


or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:


or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile



New password

Retype new password

Current password



Follow us

Follow us