Iraq intends to replace Exxon with Russian companies - reports

Published time: October 11, 2012 14:52
Edited time: October 11, 2012 19:00
Iraq, Shaikan

Iraq is reportedly considering replacing US oil major ExxonMobil with Russian companies in the West Qurna-1 project, as the authorities are angered by ExxonMobil’s deal signed with the Kurdistan regional government without Baghdad’s approval.

Baghdad is considering inviting Russia's LUKOIL and Gazprom Neft – both already operating a number of projects in the country, instead of Exxon Mobil to develop the West Qurna-1, Nefte Compass weekly reported on Thursday. With the step Baghdad would signal international companies operating in Kurdistan that it rejects any agreements with the semi-autonomous region’s government, sources in the industry told RT.

Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki has reportedly offered the deal to Russian President Vladimir Putin at the meeting Wednesday, the newspaper said. However, no such offers have been officially announced.

Russia's second-largest oil producer LUKOIL has refrained from comment. But Lukoil sources told RT that the company hasn’t received any official offers. Currently the oil major is developing the West Qurna-2 oil field in partnership with Iraqi state-run North Oil Company after Norway’s Statoil left the project. LUKOIL holds a dominant 75% share.

On Wednesday Gazprom Neft, the oil arm of Russia's top natural gas producer Gazprom, froze two contracts for oil development in the Kurdistan region, according to the Iraqi PM. In August the company signed two production sharing contracts with the Kurdistan Regional Government directly avoiding Iraqi Oil Ministry approval. The company declined to comment, though a source told Reuters that Gazprom Neft is still interested in Kurdistan’s oil.

The Russian oil major is already developing the 300 million barrel Badra deposit near the Iranian border. It holds a 30% stake in the project, along with South Korea's Kogas with 22.5%, Malaysia's Petronas with 15% and Iraq's state-owned Oil Exploration Company with 25% in the project. Production is due to start by 2013.

Comments (15)

Wibble (unregistered) 17.10.2012 11:58

If i was iraq i would do the same.

0

Undo

MEJ (unregistered) 12.10.2012 20:27

TO:MEJ (unregistered) wrote in #2You need to calm down! After all, we still need to discuss few other littler matters. After all, there is that little matter of the U.S illegal invasion of Iraq; and that little matter of the million Iraqis dead and that little matters of Fallujah and Abu Grahb. What Iraq needs is a total and complete de-Americanization similar to the prorgamme of total de-   =======     I do not have a problem with us leaving Iraq.  I thought it was a horrible mistake to invade in the first place.  But I am very interested in what Iraq country does to rebuild.  I have heard the northern Kurds are semi-autonomous and have been using the oil money without sending a big enough share to Baghdad.  But now it looks like the central government is gaining strength against those who want to secede and form their own state. I am also interested in how Turkey and Iran view the events in Northern Iraq because they consider many of the Kurds to be terrorists.  Plus I am interested in how Russian energy companies compete with Total and Exxon and Shell - sounds like this time the Russian companies have placed their bets on the central government continuing to consolidate power. Exxon was a little too slow off the mark and may have a losing bet with the Kurds.  Plus it is fascinating to see all the negotiations for upstream oil producers who might one day send product through a pipeline (*cough* Nabucco *cough*) to the west and thus to Europe.  If Russia companies are in favor with Baghdad, Iraqi oil will probably not go through any Western pipeline, or at east not very much.  It has been quite an education in geopolitics to watch what has happened around Iraq since the government politely invited USA to leave or face a human rights court.

0

Undo

ManiacMagic(MM) 12.10.2012 06:49

baghdad has no control over north iraq ... they dont even pay them what they owe ... this is why krg wants to be it's own entity and continue to prosper the way it does.

0

Undo

View all comments (15)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us