India fighting for role in global economy
Published: 15 April, 2010, 13:24
Edited: 20 April, 2010, 16:28
TAGS: Investment, Russia, Regional development, India, Economy, Finance
The leaders of the world's top emerging economies are getting together to work out how to jointly fight their corner for a greater say on the big global issues, with looking to take a leading role.
India's outsourcing industry is back on track. A year ago, at the height of the global economic slowdown, profits dropped as clients in the West cut spending. But now, industry heavyweights, like Pramod Bhasin, President of Genpact, believe the worst is behind.
“We're looking at a growth rate of nearly 13 to 15 percent. That's nearly treble, if that doesn't bring a smile back I'm not sure what will. Don't get me wrong, we cannot be complacent, the economic environment remains terribly uncertain – double dip recession, who knows what happens?”
With the BRIC countries successfully overcoming the global financial crisis, Russia wants its quartet with Brazil, India and China to take coordinated action to protect economic stability. India says the group should play a bigger role in international financial institutions and within the G20.
The leaders of the BRIC countries are eager to reduce their dependence on the US dollar for international trade, says Jan Randolph, Head of Sovereign Risk at IHS Global Insight.
“These four nations, they are distinguished not just by being the biggest, they face the world, whose international institutions and systems were basically created by the older western powers. In that sense, they have a common interest. If they want to change the international order, whether it’s the structure of IMF or the policy of IMF, we have an interest to gather to do so.”
But it’s not all plain sailing for the four countries. In India a surge in food prices is stoking inflation worries. Poor infrastructure is also seen as a hurdle to India competing globally. So, the government has embarked on a major highways building programme – the largest in the world.
“Everything you can do to decrease the cost of delivery, the cost of your services is good for your clients and good for you. That's the first reason to be in India, but there is another reason behind which is even more important. We are facing a shortage of talent in Europe, and to have access to this infinite pool of talent in India is a real competitive advantage,” says Francois Enaud, Chariman of Steria.
India may not always be an easy place to do business, but with its large domestic market, low costs, and world-class innovation, this is one market few can ignore.
X5 posts FY 2009 net profit of $165 millionRussian retail group, X5, has posted a FY 2009 net profit of $165 million under IFRS. |
Russia start ups: grabs from the Globe ForumThe Globe forum at MGIMO University brought together various players to discuss Russian start up companies and venture capital projects. They related some of their experiences to RT Business. |











‘Shining India’ vs. ‘Real India” After capturing state power in 1947, India’s Brahminists (castes such as Brahmins, Banias, Lalas who form around 8% of the Hindu population) have done very well at the expense of the rest by systematically corrupting, monopolizing and looting all state institutions established by the British. Under the ruse of “Nehruvian socialism”, the Brahminists emerged as the primary rent-seeking commissar class in bureaucracies and the vast state-run industry apparatus. Even in the private sector, economic opportunity and access is primarily reserved for these castes under the ‘permit & license raj’ system. There is how the former clerical-class hired to serve British officers emerged as the new Indian elite and establishment over the past 6 decades. Despite their political affiliation, Brahminists are indoctrinated and motivated by hegemonic ideologies spawned by fascist right-wing organizations such as the “Arya Samaj” (“Aryan Society”, established 1876), Brahmo-Samaj, HinduMahaSaba, RSS (1926, modeled as the brown-shirted Nazi SS), etc. In a largely mythical and delusional history, Brahminists collectively fancy themselves as some perpetual ruling-class of India while the objective historical record clearly shows i) mostly non-Brahmanist rule in the subcontinent over the past 2500 years (e.g. Buddhist empires, Muslim empires, Sikh rule in north) and ii) continual influxes of peoples and cultures from central asia who formed new ruling orders (e.g. Greeks, Indo-Scythians or Sakas, Huns, Mughals, Pathans, British). This divergence between historical reality and Brahminist supremacist fantasy makes them wish to annihilate the identity and history of entire religions, peoples and cultures in southasia. In the west, Brahminists act as self-appointed ambassadors of their ‘Casteocracy’. This is why information on ‘real India’ is blocked and replaced by Brahminist spin on 'shining India’.