VERSIONS: روسيا اليوم NOTICIAS FREEVIDEO ИНОТВ RTД
breakingnews
Go to main page   Community   Blogs   Peter Lavelle   McCain  
mostpopular
photo_of_the_day
bestvideos

McCain

Published: 21 October, 2008, 06:32

Russia has again entered the American presidential campaign. In the search for funding, the McCain campaign solicited Russia’s UN Ambassador Vitaly Churkin for a contribution. I am willing to concede that the letter sent to Russia’s UN mission was the result of a computer generated error. However, it shows yet again just how imperfect America’s campaigns, fund raising, elections are.

The Russian Embassy shrugged off the solicitation, rightfully recognising that American election laws prohibit the use of foreign money. In addition, it is against Russian law to contribute to foreign political parties and campaigns. This is at a time when the US lavishly spends money on foreign leaders, political parties, and elections. All of this is done under the rubric of “promoting democracy” globally.

McCain’s junk mail to the Russian Ambassador probably would have been completely passed over as a silly error if it weren’t for the Republican nominee’s attitude towards Russia. McCain’s understanding of Russia and the state of the post-Soviet space is not only out of date, but also dangerous. He wrongly sees Russia as an enemy of the US and continues to embrace a neocon agenda that is detrimental to international security.

As far as I am concerned, McCain’s junk mail to the Russian UN mission in New York is representative of McCain’s foreign policy views in general – they’re junk! Hopefully, if the polls hold as they are we will be spared experiencing the world as McCain sees it. And in the meantime, the US could do a lot more to clean up its election campaign financing.

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.

Back to top
0 (0 votes)
Marzipan 6, October 26, 2008, 11:48
0
TO G. BOGDANOV: I did not comment on whether your "brotherhood" was for against the Baltics. I merely said I was not surprised by it, and explained the reasons why. Read my post again. I have prepared a number of responses to specific points in your and Andrey's below posts, but as they are off-topic to Peter Lavelle's article and Blog, I am posting them on the RT Forum topic, "Are Russian Minority Groups Mistreated in the Baltic States?", in the News section of the Forum. I would welcome the opportunity to continue our discussion there.
G. Bogdanov, October 25, 2008, 23:02
0
Marzipan 6. About this "brotherhood" thing... Sadly, you, one more time, proved my point - you see the facts as you want them to see, rather than perceive and interpret their original meaning. And, my meaning in that message was exactly as I explained it there (no more no less) - I just noted, that there was a demonstration (I called it "action") of surprising spiritual connections between us [me and Andrey] (Russians) resulted in the quite similar comments. And no other meaning. Yet, you distorted it and saw there the "unified Russian front" against you or the Baltics. Another thing - the difference between you and me. I am ready to deal with anyone without any preconditions and you - only after some conditions are satisfied (e.g. Russian apology to the Baltic States). At least, this is my perception after reading all your messages. I will gladly take my words back if this is not the case and this is not who you are.