VERSIONS: روسيا اليوم NOTICIAS FREEVIDEO ИНОТВ RTД FIND US ON: YouTube Twitter
breakingnews
Go to main page   Community   Blogs   Peter Lavelle   North Korea and the inevitable  
mostpopular
photo_of_the_day
bestvideos

North Korea and the inevitable

Published: 29 May, 2009, 13:11

Is it inevitable that the world will have to accept North Korea as a nuclear power? For now the international community is committed to a denuclearized Korean peninsula. The world may be forced to reconsider this proposition.

We have seen countries consider development of a nuclear weapon (or in possession of such technology), but later change their position (almost always under pressure from the international community and the West in particular). Libya did, after being made into a pariah in the West, though not in the rest of the world. South Africa came clean on its weapons program after the apartheid regime relinquished power. Ukraine actually inherited an arsenal when the Soviet Union collapsed, only to later, and wisely, relinquish them to Russia. South Korea has seriously given thought to building its own nuclear deterrent, but to this day it has accepted American security guarantees instead.

Then there is the other side of the coin – countries that did drive toward nuclear status in spite of international concern or even condemnation. It is widely believed that Israel has a large arsenal of nuclear weapons. However, because of its special status as part of Washington’s strategic thinking, Israel is allowed a special indulgence around and in defiance of international law. Pakistan and India are also in the nuclear arms club. The other members of the club, over the years, have bowed to this political reality.

Many believe Iran aspires to join the nuclear arms club. It claims otherwise and also claims it is in compliance with its international obligations on the issue. According to Tehran it is only interested in peaceful use of nuclear power. This story is ongoing and remains to be played out.

North Korea is in a category of its own. It has contempt for anything it has signed regarding weapons development. In fact, it has shown that it can use words of conciliation while planning to up the ante to get what it wants. This is where we are at. Not only is North Korea a member of the nuclear club, but it also demands to remain in the club and use membership to green-mail the entire world to secure the country’s sovereignty and extort badly needed aid.

I find it very odd that the mainstream continues to regard North Korea as a crazy or irrational state. The opposite is true. North Korea is acting in a way that is very pragmatic given its international standing and domestic conditions. It is simply wishful thinking to assume North Korea will disarm because others countries have done so in the past. Those countries had many reasons to reverse course – North Korea doesn’t.

Hopefully, long and hard negotiations are ahead and not a conflict of any kind, but it should be remembered and reflected upon how North Korea has taken extreme advantage of the poor state of the current international non-proliferation regime. This has happened because the West has been too selective on its implementation. Now we are being made to pay the price for this negligence.

Nothing is inevitable, I suppose, but I won’t be surprised that the world will eventually have to accept a nuclear North Korea and a very much nuclearized northeast Asia. The alternative is to destroy the North Korean regime. Is the world prepared to do this? I think not. The negligence and complacence of the past is catching up with us.

Back to top
0 (0 votes)
Count Cash, June 02, 2009, 20:21
0
Meslin - Of course you are right, people are much the same wherever you go. Bringing people together and creating secure enviroments is what it is all about, to create and maintain peace. If the USA had paid for 100,000 American mums to meet Iaqi mums, it would have made a far better contribution to changing Iraq than sending even a single soldier. However, security is the key word here, and that only comes with being able to deter an aggressor. Sadly at the moment Nuclear weapons are the only way to hold back US and NATO, who are ideologically driven without respect for other nations, customs and people. I do like the idea of a controlled central deterrence umbrella against likely further US and NATO agression, to pretect smaller states, and remove their need for nuclear weapons. However, it would have to be credible, for people to buy into. Without a deterrent, I assure you, you will have more wars, more deaths and more suffering, a sad thing, but reality all the same.
Meslin, June 02, 2009, 18:26
0
Mr Lavelle. Riding the comments that you have received about North-Korea make me wonder about the ratio of our species'stupidity. In my 70 years of living, I had the chance to know americans in their country; russians, also in their country, africans and south-americans (same way). There is good and bad peoples everywhere. The average human, regardless of his color, religion or political aspiration is a decent person The main problems are human-nature and leaderships. I have no hard feelings toward the USA or France or anybody else; but I studied the American constitution and it french equivalent. It is difficult to understand why those documents have been so quickly ignored. It is no good for badly governed nations, to have nuclear arms but our main objectif is to have a total denuclearisation. This could be obtained only with the major powers showing the good example. In that crazy world, we are very far from it and nearer and nearer fom our own species' total extinction Radical changes are an urgent necessity. Beckering about a nation or an other is a waste of time and energy.We need a usefull and absolutly neutral ONU, not under influence or residing in the USA, Russia etc. (same apply for every other planetary institution). Since America pretend to be the leader; she must accept to be judged. Needless to make a bilan of her last 60 years' actions to realize that its imperialist attitude has done more harm than good to Humanity. (This can be objectively discussed with anyone who desagree). Sorry Future Generations ! Jean-Claude Meslin