VERSIONS: روسيا اليوم NOTICIAS FREEVIDEO ИНОТВ RTД FIND US ON: YouTube Twitter
breakingnews
Go to main page   Community   Blogs   Peter Lavelle   Russia-US: It’s the world order, stupid!  
mostpopular
photo_of_the_day
bestvideos

Russia-US: It’s the world order, stupid!

Published: 28 September, 2009, 21:32

This past week the presidents of Russia and the United States made earnest attempts to bolster a bilateral relationship that has been in tatters for at least the past eight years. The administration of Barack Obama scrapped Bush-era anti-missile plans in Eastern Europe and Dmitry Medvedev made it clear that Russia remains flexible when dealing with Iran's controversial nuclear program. Is there a quid pro quo in play? It is difficult to say at this point. However, there can be no doubt Russia and the US intend to focus on the few important issues that bring them together. This is a wise approach - for too long both countries have dwelt on what separates them.

Obama's move to walk away from anti-missile plans in Poland and the Czech Republic was decided at the very start of the new American administration. Obama had no intention of going through with defense plans that were too costly and did not work. On top of this, it was abundantly clear that a new start with Russia - now famously called "hitting the reset button" - would be impossible if the plans of George W. Bush came to fruition. Of course we were told that new intelligence findings determined that strategic threats to Europe and the US had changed and that the original missile shield plan was not longer necessary. Indeed, this may or may not be true, but it is obvious all of this has to do with Iran.

Washington has been obsessed with Iran for 30 years. For much of this time the Islamic republic has been subject to international sanctions led by the US. The fact that Tehran has again restarted its nuclear programme and is not as cooperative with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) as many demand has much of the Western world - and needless to say, Israel - up in arms (quite literally in some cases).

Russia does not deem Iran as a security threat and has long promoted a policy of dialogue and pushed for incentives to change Tehran's behavior. This is Russia's policy of flexibility and the Obama administration appears to have learned from this approach.

Russia and the US have not made a secret bilateral deal regarding Iran
- at least not yet. However, a new gambit is in play and well worth the attempt. Since the end of the Cold War the US has callously undermined the Non-Proliferation Treaty and all but ignored the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty. This has critically damaged global security. Now the US wants Russia's cooperation to set these wrongs right. The first step is a new Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START) agreement between the two countries, then work together to tackle nuclear proliferation on a global scale. This is where Iran comes into the picture.

Iran claims it is not in pursuit of a nuclear weapon. But at the same time, it points to the fact that Israel is an undeclared nuclear state in the Greater Middle East and given a free pass by Washington when it comes to international non-proliferation conventions. For the majority of the Arab and Muslim world this is a clear example of Western double-standards and duplicity. Obama hopes to change this dynamic and Russia has every reason to support this endeavour.

The significance of Medvedev's meeting with Obama in New York should be understood in the following way: resetting Russia-US relations will take time and a lot of patience. New US plans for missile defense in Europe, the future of NATO, Russia's prerogatives in the post-Soviet space, and energy politics are among the many issues the two countries must comes to terms with. This is why Moscow and Washington have the best chance to mend relations by collaborating on issues that impact global security.

Many see a major showdown on the cards regarding Iran. It is not that simple. Iran is not really the problem. What must be addressed is the fragility of the international order. Since the end of the Cold War the US believed it had licence to do whatever it wanted to on the world stage. This wreaked havoc for all for almost two decades. Obama understands this and so does Russia. Moscow and Washington may never truly be friends and allies, but both can find common cause and a meaningful "reset" of relations by mending the international order.

Peter Lavelle is a political commentator for Russia Today television and presenter of the Sunday panel programme "CrossTalk."

First published at the Moscow News

Back to top
0 (0 votes)
Bogdanov, October 03, 2009, 17:10
0
johnx. I tend to align with you on this. Though, I think, the situation a little bit more complicated. Obama is not only product of the neocon's tycoons, but also a product of the American society of the current era. GrizzlyBear-r-r. I totally agree with you on the possibility of those two options you provided about future direction of the USA. It may happen, if the country would start "jerking around". And it will. I would add, though, that there are more options, which have certain conditions to be implemented. For example -- the peaceful transformation to a truly mixed race and multi-national society. This process is going on, by the way, already for several decades. The most important thing here -- it requires time and patience. Or, being "brutally honest" -- the old (Cold War era) generation should die out and the new generations (X and Y) should completely dominate in this society. Like in that Biblical story of Moses and his people whom he kept for 40 years in the desert to "replace" them with the new generation which doesn't know what is it to be slaves. So, this way, I would put a very simple goal for American politicians -- any possible way to create conditions which would allow to avoid the civil war within next 30 years. After that the country's transformation will be complete and it will be fine. Because, what Americans need to understand is that problems are in their heads and not somewhere in the air, outside of them. They look at the presentation of those problems and not at their roots. They thought that W.Bush created the problems. But, now he is gone, but the problems still remain. Now they forgot about Bush and start blaming Obama for all those problems they have. And so on and on. But, is it possible, that those problems originated in the organization of the society itself or those rules which govern this country? How about that gap which is widening between current and actual state of the American society and those basic documents which establish the rules of living? What if the problems exist because people stopped being responsible for themselves and their country? What if the lack of thinking and perception of the surrounding world and ignorance to the political processes in this country is a source of the problems? But, every time when Michael Moore comes with his new documentary and start bringing those questions and digging for answers it creates a storm which move the nasty things in the air. And it smells bad... I wrote already many times -- democracy and freedom are not for free. You have to work hard to have them... Many Americans afraid certain things and they like ostriches put their heads in the sand. And wait until the problems either magically go away by themselves or somebody else will come to resolve them. They afraid crisis. But, crisis are good. They are healing. They force people to think, act, and being organized. For example I see this fear of the Socialism exhibited by many whom I know. But, why? Sadly, they don't even know what it is about and not willing to know. What they know is that Capitalism it is something what produces goods and the Socialism -- what consumes those goods. This is why the Socialism is evil. So, it requires personal work to learn about it (even better -- to experience it) and then actively either dismiss it forever or accept it. Otherwise it will be exactly what I see in the States today -- on words Americans are "by all their hearts" against the Socialism, but, on practice, they want more and more this Socialism. Without even being aware of it. And one more thing. Americans afraid of strong government. But, they do not aware that this is exactly the reason -- strong government -- what makes this country being a Superpower and provides stable living environment. I, personally, much more afraid of weak government. I experienced personally in the end of 80s what is it to live in the country without government (or dysfunctional government). A weak government -- a perfect conditions for creating local gangs, mafias, shooting and killing on the streets. A county with the weak government is a county for gangsters. This is a world of humans. If they are not restrained, some of them will start behave like animals.
GrizzlyBear-r-r, October 03, 2009, 05:23
0
Bogdanov, I think Obama leads the country to a disaster by his outrageous spending programs, ongoing wars and alienating middle class white Americans who are responding to his ruling by buying more guns and ammunition. His latest involvement into a racial motivated scandal in Massachusetts showed his true colors. I also think that he's a very weak person with no political identity, thus will be manipulated by old boys club of military and financial oligarchs My prediction is that his presidency will leave the country with two options: 1. Dictatorship that would be the only way to preserve country's integrity 2. USSR-like country dismemberment We will see all that in no more than eight years from now. The good thing is that after all that happens, nobody will care about Iran any more and Israel will not be considered as unconditional American's friend and multi-billion dollar donation recipient. The bad thing - USA and world's instability if the country will go with option #2.