Is pop-stars’ donating sums for charity a heartfelt gest to help distressed people, or just a publicity stunt?
David24 July, 2007, 09:46
A combination of both, maybe - After all, as somebody said, no great deeds are done in isolation. Why only pop stars, all kinds of celebrities with money like to indulge in philanthropy, just to assuage their inner Devils maybe and placate their Guilt, to some extent.! However cause I'm neither that Rich nor a celebrity, I may be wrong on both accounts!
Here in Montreal Kindergardens and Playspaces for children are financed by the state mainly. (couples pay 7$/child per day). It turns out the tax take for the state from the freed women more than compensates the expense.
It makes no diffrenece what the motives are for those who set up child spaces in Russia. With six million children living below poverty line the real supporter must be the state as it was during soviet
times and as it exists to day in Norway Sweden etc. If Putin is serious about a declining population he must attend to this.
everything we do we expect to get something out of it. Whether it is for publicity or simply to feel good about ourselves, at least we are doing something that helps other regardless of motive.
MyEE Online wrote in #5 Imagine if all superstars in the world could donate just 1% of their wealth each to the poor. There wouldn't be any poor persons left in the world.
Wonderful idea but needs to be advanced to any rich people in the world!
But don't forget, there is NWO-organisation (NewWorldOrder) and Zionism, they are not interested, to become more and more rich men. USreal is controlled by 200 rich families and they wants to control the whole word!
