Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.

 

Greenpeace executive to stop flying to work after public uproar

Published time: June 24, 2014 18:11
A KLM flight takes off from Schiphol Airport in Amsterdam (Reuters / United Photos / Toussaint Kluiters)

A KLM flight takes off from Schiphol Airport in Amsterdam (Reuters / United Photos / Toussaint Kluiters)

Greenpeace has relented to public pressure and agreed that its second-in-command will no longer fly 350 km between Luxembourg and Amsterdam for work meetings, following a leaked report of mismanagement and unaccountability at the environmental group.

Pascal Husting, international programme director at the environmental charity, had been making the trip several times a month since 2012, according to revelations published in the Guardian on Monday.

"We understand the commotion; an environmental group should put its ideals into practice. Pascal will take the train to his family in the future," said a statement from Greenpeace, which has a $400 million annual budget.

The statement marks a volte-face for the Amsterdam-headquartered group, which initially defended Husting.

“Pascal has a young family in Luxembourg. When he was offered the new role, he couldn’t move his family to Amsterdam straight away. He’d be the first to say he hates the commute, hates having to fly, but right now he hasn’t got much of an option until he can move. He wishes there was an express train between his home and his office, but it would currently be a 12-hour round trip by train,” said executive director Kumi Naidoo.

Pascal Husting (AFP Photo / Philipp Guelland)

Greenpeace’s own official position on passenger aviation is somewhat less forgiving.

“Flying causes 10 times more climate change than taking the train,” says the charity’s UK page.

“The growth in aviation is ruining our chances of stopping dangerous climate change. To achieve this, companies like BA need to end their needless short haul routes, and the government needs to ban all mainland domestic routes, where the train is an easy alternative.”

The revelations of executive perks are only the tip of the iceberg for the troubled charity, which earlier this month revealed losses of about $5 million on currency speculation last year.

“The international finance function at Greenpeace International has faced internal team and management problems for several years and the situation did not improve during 2013 despite efforts and support,” says a confidential internal document published in November last year.

“This has resulted in errors and sub-standards in the quality of financial systems.”

Among the problems detailed are high staff turnover, friction between Amsterdam and Greenpeace’s 28 local offices, lack of competent oversight, and poor communication practices.

“I hired a new head of finance who has over 20 years’ experience working with international NGOs. We have also strengthened his team. He’s already put checks in place to make sure the problems we have had are a thing of the past,” said Naidoo in light of the disclosures.

But Gerald Steinberg, president of NGO Monitor, a charities watchdog, says that the problems are more systemic than staff under-performance at a specific office.

“The extent of it [the problems at Greenpeace] was not something I expected. But it’s part of the fact that NGOs keep things very much within the organization; there’s no culture of accountability. They call on governments to be accountable but they lack this in so many ways, so in that sense it’s not a surprise,” he told the Guardian.

“NGOs tend to see themselves as insurgents. They have now become the establishment but without the structures that are required for such large organizations – they can no longer think of themselves as insurgents but as corporate organizations. That hurts their self-image but there is no other way to avoid the financial meltdowns that can take place.”

Comments (31)

 

Loz Powell 25.06.2014 13:20

ARDN 25.06.2014 07:12


Donati ng money to Greenpeace is not very different from donating to any other corporation such as Exxon, Shell or BP.

  


agree! ++

 

Loz Powell 25.06.2014 13:16

Ursula Riches 25.06.2014 12:39

Please tell me Russia, Why do GreenPEACE want £450,000 to patch up the Rainbow warrior? Are they GREED PIECE? Does having a ship sitting in a dock cause it to require THAT much repair?

  


di dnt you know greenpeace is big bisness now! ,if they sold all there share,s they could probably buy the south american rain forest! like if oxfam sold all there share,s they could feed the entire third-world population for 8 years.... fix a problem=less donations they may have started with good intentions but the nature of the game now they are hypocrit capitalists

 

Ursula Riches 25.06.2014 12:39

Please tell me Russia, Why do GreenPEACE want £450,000 to patch up the Rainbow warrior? Are they GREED PIECE? Does having a ship sitting in a dock cause it to require THAT much repair?

View all comments (31)
Add comment

Authorization required for adding comments

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

OK

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

X

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us

Follow us