No trust for RT anymore (unregistered) wrote in #8
RT no longer holds the position of a valid and trustworthy 'news' site for me anymore, due to the completely biased reporting of many topics and events. The corporation is very prone to massive exxageration and huge sensationalism. The sad thing is, many of you (presumably young, uneducated and unknowledgable) readers believe it in preference to western media, including the legally balanced BBC. One recent example is the RT coverage of the Royal Diamond Jubilee, where the event was denounced as 'pompous' and only one side of view was given as evidence of non-support- that of a laughably small minority, Republic. No balance was apparent, and still many of you idiots reading this site took the view of Republic (and stupidly biased RT) to be widespread amongst Britons, when in actual fact it was not. Anyway, my point is, stories like these that are clearly heavily exaggerated and sensationalised have proven that RT is not a credible site for newsgatherers- more like a turn-to for the stupid, the angry and conspiracy-nutters, who are prone to Russian propoganda.    � �         � �         � �         � �         � �         � �         � �         � �         � �         � �         � �         � �       P.s. Please stop going on about this stupid Zionist conspiracy, or the reptilian one etc. They're all complete rubbish! Anyone that attempts to tell truth referring to David Icke or David Wilcock, or any other anti-reptile person should seriously consider mental help. Paranoia such as this is not good for you. Practice makes it perfect.  http://www.rt.com/ne ws/israel-ufo-missil e-337/
We do not hear screetching sounds of "Attack Iran" from Israel lately. Topol does not miss.

RT no longer holds the position of a valid and trustworthy 'news' site for me anymore, due to the completely biased reporting of many topics and events. The corporation is very prone to massive exxageration and huge sensationalism. The sad thing is, many of you (presumably young, uneducated and unknowledgable) readers believe it in preference to western media, including the legally balanced BBC. One recent example is the RT coverage of the Royal Diamond Jubilee, where the event was denounced as 'pompous' and only one side of view was given as evidence of non-support- that of a laughably small minority, Republic. No balance was apparent, and still many of you idiots reading this site took the view of Republic (and stupidly biased RT) to be widespread amongst Britons, when in actual fact it was not. Anyway, my point is, stories like these that are clearly heavily exaggerated and sensationalised have proven that RT is not a credible site for newsgatherers- more like a turn-to for the stupid, the angry and conspiracy-nutters, who are prone to Russian propoganda.    � �         � �         � �         � �         � �         � �         � �         � �         � �         � �         � �         � �       P.s. Please stop going on about this stupid Zionist conspiracy, or the reptilian one etc. They're all complete rubbish! Anyone that attempts to tell truth referring to David Icke or David Wilcock, or any other anti-reptile person should seriously consider mental help. Paranoia such as this is not good for you.

I noticed some of my posts went off topic a bit. So let me add that I think NATO would be good IF it was ONLY for defensive purposes only. However that is not the case and that needs to change as well.

I don't see at all how bombing weddings and funerals has anything to do with 9/11.

This is the problem. On one hand I have to question who the real people where behind 9/11. Yes, I know who the puppets where and who was directly responsible, which is why we are in Afghanistan. But who there puppet masters. Bin Laden and Bush's family where pretty close. 9/11 happened on bush's watch.

On the other hand the people in my country go insane when we are attacked. Sadly we have given up many freedoms for safety and in doing so probably deserve neither.

It has been over ten years now. Killing civilians doesn't make things right at all. Military fighting military, fine, (though you all know by now how I feel about war and killing.) At least military against military makes more sense, well war doesn't make sense but I think everyone gets my point. Killing children, bombing weddings. That sounds more like the old mafia in the early 20th century in my country. I don't see at all the difference between what happened on 9/11 and that.

Fightin g fire with fire only creates a larger fire that will eventually burn out of control when the winds shift.

And the ones making out the most? Yep, as always the corporations and bankers. Again I have to wonder who is really pulling the strings.

We are all fools denying the obvious. It is right in front of us yet we choose to still fight and blame each other. Maybe we all deserve what we get.