Regrets and fingerpointing as world powers swallow Annan’s resignation

Published time: August 02, 2012 23:24
Edited time: August 03, 2012 07:21
Kofi Annan, Joint Special Envoy of the United Nations and the League of Arab States for Syria gives a press conference in Geneva to announce his resignation on August 2, 2012 (AFP Photo / Yann Castanier)
Download video (30.32 MB)
Embed

Kofi Annan’s resignation from his post as the UN-Arab League joint envoy to Syria has prompted an ample international reaction. While most countries regretted the decision, some used the opportunity to take new jabs at the Syrian leadership.

­Washington said Annan’s resignation highlighted Russia's and China's failure to support action against Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. White House Press Secretary Jay Carney added that Assad continued to “brutally murder” his own people, in spite of promises to follow Annan’s six-point plan.    

The reaction out of London largely echoed what the world had already heard from America.

We understand Annan’s frustration that, due to vetoes in the Security Council, the international community was unable to give him the support that he needed and requested,” British Foreign Secretary William Hague said in a statement.

Hague also noted that the Syrian government was failing to meet its obligations according to the Annan plan, instead continuing to repress its people. Nevertheless, Hague commended Annan’s efforts and stressed that the best chance of bringing about a peaceful solution to the crisis would be to stick to outgoing the envoy’s plan, as well as the Geneva communiqué adopted in June.    

However, Prime Minister David Cameron signaled what could be a new, harsher period in the West's treatment of the Assad regime.

The Annan plan "hasn't worked because we have got this appalling bloodshed. I think what we need to do is actually ramp things up,”  he told Sky News.

Annan's resignation “illustrates the dramatic stalemate of the Syrian conflict,” said French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius. France's UN envoy also voiced concerns that the observer mission could be wrapped up following the envoy's departure. The UN Security Council will decide on the observers' next move on August 16.

A wide spectrum of international leaders and diplomats expressed disappointment over Annan's stepping down, including Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Kofi Annan is an honorable man and a brilliant diplomat, so I regret this very much,” Putin said. “But I hope that the international community will continue the efforts to end violence.

Moscow was happy to learn, though, that the UN and Arab League are looking for a successor to continue the peace mission, remarked Russian envoy to the UN Vitaly Churkin.

We understand that it's his decision,” Churkin told reporters. “We have very strongly supported Kofi Annan's efforts. He has another month to go, and I hope this month will be used as effectively as possible under these very difficult circumstances.

Syria voiced regret over Annan’s resignation, reaffirming its support of the principles he laid out.

“Syria still believes the only way out of the crisis is a national dialogue and a peace resolution, not a foreign intervention,” the Syrian Foreign Ministry said, adding that Damascus would continue its pursuit of terrorism and its bid to ensure security in the country.

UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon commended Annan’s efforts to put an end to the Syrian conflict.

Kofi Annan deserves our profound admiration for the selfless way in which he has put his formidable skills and prestige to this most difficult and potentially thankless of assignments,” Ban noted in a statement. “I will continue to draw on his wisdom and counsel, and on the work of the Office of the Joint Special Envoy.

Ban also blamed both the Syrian government and opposition for continuing to rely on “ever-increasing” violence to further their cause. The Secretary General also took note of other hurdles in the way of a peaceful solution to the crisis.

The persistent divisions within the Security Council have themselves become an obstacle to diplomacy, making the work of any mediator vastly more difficult,” he said.  

Annan’s resignation came as the UN General Assembly continued to discuss a draft resolution on Syria. The original draft, written by Saudi Arabia, called for new sanctions against the country and insisted on Assad’s resignation. Both clauses were removed as the draft risked failure to reach 100 votes in a vote scheduled for Friday. The original was panned by key international players such as Russia, China, Brazil and India.

Churkin noted that the draft was an “extremely unbalanced and one-sided resolution.” He also said the countries pushing most actively for its adoption were the ones providing weapons to the Syrian opposition.

This is, unfortunately, the tragedy of the matter, something which made Kofi Annan's efforts so difficult," he said.

The amended draft still calls on the Syrian government to stop shelling and conducting helicopter attacks, and to withdraw its troops to the barracks. It also calls on the Syrian government to “refrain from using, or transferring to non-state actors, any chemical and biological weapons, or any related material.

Comments (32)

wesley (unregistered) 15.08.2012 07:26

AmericanInRomania (unregistered) wrote in #7
JJ (unregistered) wrote in #6
Here is some information on The Jewish Internet Defence Force yeah
the guys that post on here like The Monk, American In Romania! Here
you can learn a bit about these guys that get paid to post here:
--------Wha t does that have to do with:  Syria, Kofi Annan, the Syrian Revolution or the Syrian people rising against "40 years of dictatorship"?
An swer:  Nothing.  You are posting irrelevant matter to the article, blog or  subject of conversation because you have been wrong/lying who is the opposition and defending a worldwide illegitimate dictator, Assad. ---------- -------------------- -------------------- -----------I think the reason they keep referring to Zionists is because they use it as a propaganda tool to manipulate the emotions of many Muslims. They know Israel is not liked because they took land from the Palestinians. Therefore, whenever they start to lose their weak argument, they bring it up and blame them for everything and accuse people disagreeing with them of being Zionists to try and gain support for their fact-less opinions. I don't think they understand what a fact is. All I ever see is incorrect comments backed by faceless sources or no information.

0

Undo

Sam's (unregistered) 12.08.2012 11:15

Eurasian (unregistered) wrote in #3
We can speculate the entire mission and his move all we want and from all the different angles. Indeed is regrettable, but still honorable move if he has to take endlessly his orders from Washington and twist everything around. The Money loooney now takes the ball ans WILL try to screw it all. Russia and China has permanently VETOED regime change in the UNSC. How we gonna play it now “geniuses”? Slobodan Milosevic, Saddam, Gaddafi and yet Assad (be fair Eurasian – Arafat IS on the helm of all this) ALL called for the UN be reformed – including the Iranian Ahmadinejad. Time has come! It is a grave tragedy ,Mr Anan effort to bring a peace to that place washed away with warmongers effort ,and dictating to sheep brained members of UN,what to say and what to do, look at the Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain,is there anybody talking about human rights, democracy,liberty equality of those nations, of course not, oil &Naval basis ,greed ,are all endemic,Use to respect Clinton, if fear that I had mistaken , when dirty politics comes, all of them are the same .

0

Undo

Steve (unregistered) 10.08.2012 22:29

The Syrian revolution is an outside funded and induced war by rebels mostly from outside Syria.  There were large protests in Syria in support of Assad but the so called free press reported those pictures as against him.   Even the news sources from outside report conflicting lies about the conflict. But all unite to convey Assad should go.  What ever changes Syria needs to its leadership, the people should decide in Syria, when foriegn terrorists are driven out with thier so called financeirs of NATO and US.  Now with terror everywhere the differant ethnic groups will be afraid of each other.   The Arab Spring was designed to accomplish destabilization, so they can put in puppet goverments or other illigitamate ones, for control of the oil rich region of the middle east and Africa.

0

Undo

View all comments (32)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us