Assange works on from 'ambassadorial premises'

Published time: June 20, 2012 23:05
Edited time: June 21, 2012 03:05
Wikileaks chief press spokesman Kristinn Hrafnsson and RT’s correspondent Sara Firth in front of the Ecuadorian embassy in London.
Download video (66.67 MB)
Embed

While the world anticipates the next dramatic twist in Julian Assange’s legal saga, a WikiLeaks press spokesman told RT about the mood inside the Ecuadorian embassy in London, where Assange is seeking political asylum.

­RT: You’ve just been inside and met with Julian Assange. How is he feeling about all of this?

Kristinn Hrafnsson: Well, he is in a good spirits, as always. He is certain he is taking the right move.

RT: It was a dramatic step and very unexpected for a lot of people. Were you aware of what was going on?

KH: I can’t really comment on that. But nothing surprises me anymore in this world.

RT: And how is the mood inside? Is there any sense of what decision is going to be from Ecuador’s government?

KH: Well, you know that he has a lot of goodwill within the Ecuadorian government and the Ecuadorian people. There is a lot of support in Latin America in general. People have actually been on the streets in support of WikiLeaks. WikiLeaks' revelations have done a lot of good in Latin America and in Ecuador as well. But the outcome is uncertain and it will just take days for that to be revealed.

RT: Do you think Assange felt like he was pushed into a corner because, obviously, a lot of legal options have been exhausted?

KH: The legal options here in the UK are exhausted. And it is of course very serious that in a very uncompromising manner the Swedish prosecutor has stated that he would be put into prison, into isolation, upon arrival in Sweden – even though he has not been charged with anything, and is only wanted for questioning. Questioning he has been asked into for a year and a half. He actually has wanted to be questioned. He, I believe, offered the prosecutor to come over here to the embassy to question him.

The more serious question on hand, of course, is the looming threat of extradition from Sweden to the United States. We know that the secret grand jury has been in operation for more than a year and a half gathering information, in a clear attempt to indict Julian and possibly all those in WikiLeaks.

And we have an indication that a sealed indictment is already in place but that is unconfirmed.

RT: Julian has always maintained that this is politically motivated, the case that has been brought against him. You work for WikiLeaks now. How did this affect WikiLeaks?

KH: Julian has been under house arrest for now more than one and a half years. WikiLeaks has continued. But of course the situation has affected WikiLeaks. One of many obstacles that we have to face and fight is the banking blockade for example, where we have a court case, the first of many.

But we have continued and it is extraordinary, of course that despite the house arrest Julian has continued to work and lead the work of WikiLeaks, and will from these new premises while he stays here as well.

RT: There has been a bit of criticism about the fact that breaking the bail conditions means the there has been a lot of money lost that people put up for him. Has he mentioned anything about that?

KH: As far as I know, there is no certainty that the bail money is lost. That is up to some legal interpretation which I am not expert in. But the bail money is not lost, as far as I know, yet.

Comments (11)

dahszil 24.06.2012 07:30

UhOh, you are an enemy of the people for commenting honestly and dealing with the facts!...lol.  excellent, clear and concise points in your comment my friend.  in total agreement and support. thanks for your post.
dahszil, male, usa

+2

Undo

UhOh (unregistered) 22.06.2012 09:04

Assange has exposed the fraud and fantasy of a free and just Western style of government. I knew the system was broken, but I never thought Europe and countries like Australia were part of a true criminal network. The function we are witnessing is no different than a criminal mob.

+9

Undo

Stu (unregistered) 21.06.2012 16:49

Two words: Gary McKinnon
The extradition treaty between the USA and the UK is unfair and one-sided in favor of the Americans, who more often than not, need only ask to have a British citizen hauled off to face an American court. Whereas the UK has to outright prove guilt before they can put an American on trial.
If the USA really wanted Assange, they could just ask the British government to hand him over, no need for Sweden to be dragged in. The UK wont refuse, because this is the same UK that sends hundreds of it's own troops to die in American wars.


All I'm seeing in this story is a simple man running away from an unproven fiction, the American boogeyman has not yet been proven as real. Since this all started, it has never been able to go beyond scare stories and what-if. What kind of a man is Assange compared to that American soldier who actually acquired the leaks in the first place?
Though I can't recall his name, that one soldier is the hero of this tale, him standing up alone in front of the full rage of America for doing what he believed in. While Assange here takes all the glory for what another person did, and is now running away like a true coward now that his castle in the sky is on the verge of falling down.

0

Undo

View all comments (11)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us