Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.

 

‘Gold standard’ in decline: BBC panned by media newbies

Published time: June 28, 2012 02:34
Edited time: June 28, 2012 06:34
A woman walks past a British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) sign at the Television Centre in White City, west London (AFP Photo / Ben Stansall)
Download video (10.39 MB)
Embed

An internal inquiry at the BBC concluded that although “generally impartial”, its coverage of the Middle East uprisings lacked context. TJ Walker, CEO of Media Training Worldwide, says the BBC is losing its status as a leading broadcaster.

­“There is a bias, always in favor of the bigger story. The true revolution is always going to be more exciting, it’s going to be a bigger story and that’s what reporters want to be a part of. It doesn’t mean it was a good journalistic decision, but that is reality when it comes to major networks,” Walker told RT.

Authored by Edward Mortimer, a former foreign affairs commentator for the Times and Financial Times and ex-UN director of communications, the BBC Trust report accused the network of being slow to highlight human rights abuses by rebel factions in the Libyan war and underestimating the violent nature of the Syrian uprising as it began. It also stated that the channel failed to provide international reaction to events or focus on other countries like Saudi Arabia and Bahrain.

The BBC has acknowledged that its coverage of the subject could have been broader.

“In the conflict in Egypt in the beginning. . . we might have sounded over-excited – you can take on the color of who you’re with,” Helen Boaden, the director of news, was quoted saying. “In Libya too, where we were essentially embedded [with the rebels] at the start, we might have sounded over-excited – you have to be careful if you can’t get to the other side of the story.”

In TJ Walker’s opinion, the corporation’s bigger problem is the increasing competition.

“It’s easy to be the gold standard when you really have no competition. And that was the case for so many decades,” he said. Now, he continued, new networks are emerging around the world. Bloggers, citizen journalists and websites are taking their own niches too.

“And there’s a lot of good stuff out there at every level – to professional level, at the citizen journalism level. So it’s harder for one organization to be the dominant voice,” Walker concluded.

Comments (18)

AmericanInRomania (unregistered) 22.07.2012 17:31

I have seen the BBC do better with stories, but the limited access provided to Syria might be playing a role too.
Overall, the BBC is probably one of or the finest and uses the most journalistic integrity than any other news provider.They definitely have more competition than they had in the past, but one can see their real efforts at impatiality and to incorporate as many sources as possible. 
I think the BBC will remain one of the most credible news sources in the world if they keep funding and pursuing journalism where it happens and when it happens. 
I think most news readers in the world  think quite highly of the BBC and many around the world enjoy the free services and access to high quality, informative and accurate news. 
On a personal note, I trust the BBC more than any source from my own country.

0

Undo

Hussain Almousawi (unregistered) 29.06.2012 21:31

The BBC always trying to show itself as impartial but it is not. For example take the case of  the Norway massacre. Without waiting details they immediately accused Muslims of being crying it. About Bahrain there is no cry at all on the crimes committed continually against innocent people and peaceful protest. In Syria they keep blind eyes on the brutal killing of  civilians and the terror even to the Christian churches by the so called (the Syrian Rebels). So where is the impartial?

+2

Undo

The Beak (unregistered) 28.06.2012 20:36

The BBC is dead a long time ago. Except for the English no sensible person listen to thirst BBC propaganda. Bias no, Propaganda that is what the BBC represents. It's akin to listening to Tony Blair speak. Question: Mr. Blair, what has happened to David Kelly. Answer: Cannot say, I am a politicial. You may want to direct that Question to Scotland Yard. So, we may have to do the same if we ask about Princess D. Who want to listen to BBC?

+16

Undo

View all comments (18)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us