Sam,

Multicul turalism suits and is being financed only by those forces from outside who want to control soverei gn countries for their agenda, because if the country is homogeneous& nbsp;there is no conflicting sides and no room for manoeuvring . Prior to tha massacre Norway refused to obey orders by the ruling cabal and they sent a Freemason to carry out the killings to teach Norway a lesson. By killing young politicians they diverted attention as if this was the real motive which it worked, as ordinary citizens in Norway believe it was, but those at the top now exactly what is going on. Now, as the judicial&nb sp;system will only sentence this cold blooded killer lightly, it will satisfy both, norwayan people and what's more important those who ordered the killings, who in turn promised&n bsp;their killer freedom beforehand. What is on trail now is not a norwayan patriot but an Iluminati cold blooded murderer and sworn enemy to Norway.  & nbsp;

Tom:It obviously isn't a legitimate lawful country where innocent people are protected. There are parts of Oslo where native Norwegians can't go because they will be harassed&nbs p;by the young Muslims. That is one of the reasons why Anders did what he did, to make Norway safe again.
To fix this he went after the next set of scum bag politicians. They may not have all been scum bags yet, but they would all certainly become scum if left to their own devices.
The lies and propaganda proliferated by the multiculturalists has spread world wide. It has become the new religion. I say this because their doctrine means that you have to ignore logic and known indisputa ble truths in order to follow it. All you have to do is look at the statistics of any country in the world with a mixed population. Who causes the trouble? Who cleans up after it? What are the victim/perpetrator ratios across the races?
Mass murdering is obviously bad - but we should at least try to learn from history. The only way to stop this happening again is to clean up this mess! 

EVROPA IMPERIALIS

Th is trail is on a 6.00 o'clock news on every canal&nbs p;all over the World and everyone is asking the same question; why would a cold blooded murderer get in Norway  maximum only 21 years for 77 people he killed, only 3 months for each killed person? No one knows if his term will be prolonged or not, the fact is Norway has a law which is outdated and soft to the criminals. I wonder who brought this law in force? Laws are brought by people and can be changed by people. This is the time f or action if Norway wants to present itself to the World as legitimate. lawful country where innocent& nbsp;people are rightly protected by criminals. 

tom wrote in #2
EVROPA IMPERIALIS

Wh y then the court set 3 months maximum term for every person this murderer killed if he is found guilty?  *** *********
They can not legally sentence him to more than 21 years in prison right now because of Norwegian law. In 21 years, there will be an evaluation if he is still a danger to society and he will get another 5 years. And five years later, five more. He will in reality get a life sentence. 
I f you come to Norway to kill someone and expect to get away with a mere 3 months in prison, you are in for a rude awakening.

EVROPA IMPERIALIS

Wh y then the court set 3 months maximum term for every person this murderer killed if he is found guilty? 

tom wrote in #20
EVROPA IMPERIALIS

I hope he will rot in jail but the justice system in Norway  send out to the World a wrong message with maximum jail term of 3 months for killing a person in Norway. The whole World is watching this event and that kind of message we get from this trail.  **** ***********
There is no maximum of 3 months for killing a person in Norway. That is turning everything upside down. There is a maximum sentence of 21 years (even for one murder), that can be prolonged for five years at a time indefinately. In reality it can mean life in prison, and for Breivik it certainly means life in prison. 

tom wrote in #2
EVROPA IMPERIALIS

Th e people of the World and Norway want justice now and not if he is considered dangerous while in jail! What would parents of killed children think when they heAR this news? What if this murderer is not considered as dangerous to the society while serving his term? He will walk on the streets in few years time. Is this justice&nb sp;dear EVROPA IMPERIALIS?  *********
Utøya was an atrocious act, don't get me wrong, but he did not kill anyone under the age of 14 - (the same age as the youngest criminal ever executed in the USA), and the average age of the killed was above 20. The vast majority of them were youth politicians - the next generation of the Labour party. It was not like he was shooting up a kindergarten.
Bre ivik will in reality get a life sentence. I'll bet everything I own that he will never be set free. That is what most people wants isn't it?

There is such a thing as racism, some claim. Personally, I don't recognise such a thing existing at all. I only see symptoms. One incontestible fact is, some people who are not ready to live together but are forced to, will react. Its human behavior.

To call it racism or to moralise it is meaningless. Puff. Noise in the wind. Its really behavior. One cannot expect irrational and fearful people to behave any other way.

When you think of it, there really is no such thing as racism. No one really hates someone because they are different; that would be a mindless statement to make - indiscriminately misleading, without exaggeration. Anger and frustration are reactions to fear and uncertainty.

Racism, antisemitism, islamofobia, and such words fuel the phenomena they purport to describe, for nothing is ever done to do away with the causes and reasons that incite such supposed feelings. Those causes and reasons are the sometimes justified and sometimes unjustified preconceptions and fears people have of someone they don't know.

Another idea I'm going to throw in the pot is, that mad and unstable people like Breivik should be regarded as indicators of societal health and level of civilisation. The meaningless emotional farce that Breiviks judgement is, should be much less interesting than focus on the indicator role and its implications.

As I said in another comment, we can be forever certain that among us there is always someone delicate enough to react to pressure and point out our flaws. This is the most useful point of view to shocking events of all kind, if the intention is to fix problems and prevent future unpleasantries. On the other hand, if that is not the purpose, which would be rather dmn curious, then people can go crazy all they like. Moralise, point fingers, ban guns and knives, and such hilarious monkey mania.

One of the most sickening mental lapses found in comments to this subject is to think that people who agree with Breivik to some degree, in the sense that multiculturalism is problematic in some instances, would also agree with Breiviks solution. All who fall to make this kind of mental errors should not participate in any public discussion before reattending basic school.

Perhaps only his vain desire to put his name in history using the ancient conflict between east and west (Islam and Christianity)  to achieve his petty desire for fame, a way of confirming his hallow existance, the result of not having a soul to feel the reality of being.

tom wrote in #4
anonimous ,

Is Norway competing with US for torture and murders? In my view giving a murderer maximum sentence of 3 months for killing someone in cold blood, Norway is encouraging& nbsp;killers and is worst than US.  ******* ***
Norway can prolong his sentence for five years at a time indefinately, as long as he is considered dangerous. He will spend the rest of his life in prison, without a doubt.
This claim of "tree months for one murder" is not correct.

This case reminds me in more aspects to the murdering of gypsies some years ego in Hungary. The perpetrator of killings was known by the Hungarian secret service, they knew that he was a dangerous man with weapons, and in spite of this he was able to commit the killings, similarly to Breivik. His only aim was to create tension between ethnics, and he was succeed in it. Breivik’s aim was the same. Both of them were trained in using weapons. Both of them had foreign relations. Breivik was in Belarus, the Hungarian terrorist spent more than one year in Israel before the killings. Nor Breivik’s, nor the Hungarian’s finance sources are  known exactly…    &n bsp; 

anonimous,

Is Norway competing with US for torture and murders? In my view giving a murderer maximum sentence of 3 months for killing someone in cold blood, Norway is encouraging& nbsp;killers and is worst than US. 

Zak (unregistered) wrote in #14 It's unbelivable...Is it possible that man who kill 77 people in cold blood in "spetacular" attack...in "self defence"...and would have done it again...might serve sentence and walk out as a free man...as nothing ever happend? A.Breivik deserve to die and I will hope that he never walk alive from that prison...   ; the us government murders tens of thousands per year for money and kidnap their citizens and take away all their rights and hold them for years for things that should not even be crimes and deliberately destroy their own economy and nothing is done about it, by comparison, his sentence is very harsh, and i commend this system for using their intelligence and humanity in dealing with crimes

Hello World, killing people in Norway will only get you maximum 3 months jail!