Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.


Search engines to censor file-sharing sites? Google loses key case

Published time: July 20, 2012 20:15
Edited time: July 21, 2012 00:15
Google already self-censors certain terms, like Megaupload.

Google already self-censors certain terms, like Megaupload.

Google has lost a landmark case after France’s Supreme Court ruled that the search engine must filter automatically suggested links to sites that offer pirated content. The ruling may open up the floodgates for more search restrictions.

­The case was initiated by French copyright group SNEP back in 2010. It concerns Google's Autocomplete and Instant features, which automatically suggest websites based on the first few letters typed into the Google search line. SNEP claimed the feature was directing users towards illegal content, even if the searchers did not actively pursue it.

Among the examples are torrent providers, such as The Pirate Bay, and Internet file hosting services like Rapidshare and Megaupload.

A lower court did not initially rule in favor of SNEP, but France’s top judicial authority, the Court de Cassation, said the copyright group was entitled to use “all measures to prevent or stop such an attack on copyright or related rights.

“This decision, showing that search engines should be responsible for regulating the Internet, is a first in France,” said a statement from David El Sayegh, the CEO of SNEP.

Incidentally, Google has itself voluntarily blacklisted file-sharing sites from being automatically suggested since the end of last year. Although the system is imperfect, it broadly complies with the principles demanded by SNEP.

Google said it was dismayed by the ruling, and claimed there was no criminal intent behind the operation of its Autocomplete and Instant products.

"Google Autocomplete algorithmically returns search queries that are a reflection of the search activity of all web users,” said a statement from the company.

Although the consequences of the decision will likely be minor, several Internet portals have expressed concern that intellectual property companies will now use search engines as their next weapon in the battle against piracy. Experts also noted that the censorship concerns sites that are not officially illegal or responsible for pirated content.

Comments (1)


Curtis Neeley 09.02.2014 21:57

Google Inc exists because of an utter fraud. Claiming "bots" have no idea what content they sweep up and calling these images or text just digital "bits and bites". While this claim has components of truth, the "digital" intellect of the common juror VASTLY exceeds the "digital" intellect of the common judge. When the mistakes of todays judicial system come before the next generation of judges, Google Inc will cease to exist as a criminal profiteer. BTW I have faced Google Inc in federal courts for about five years and have lost thus far but have a pending FRCP Rule 60(b) motion to reconsider. I will lose again.

Add comment

Authorization required for adding comments

Register or



Show password


or Register

Request a new password


or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:


or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile



New password

Retype new password

Current password



Follow us

Follow us