Iran has uranium for 4 nukes, builds US-reach missiles - Israel

February 02, 2012 14:02

Iranian scientists have already managed to enrich enough radioactive material to successfully produce not just one, but four nuclear bombs, Israel’s military intelligence chief has announced.

View full story

Comments (92) Sort by: highest rating oldest first newest first

Anonymous user 20.03.2013 23:38

Israel looks in the mirror. Israel has hundreds of nukes, Jericho III ICBMs that can hit Washington.

+22

Undo

Cotton25Marie (unregistered) 19.08.2012 08:00

I took my first loans when I was 20 and this aided my relatives a lot. Nevertheless, I need the financial loan again.

0

Undo

wayne (unregistered) 14.05.2012 14:34

Wasnt there a joint radar sytem design formed by germany and isreal to survay the middle eastern skys  for nuclear tiped  war heads or somthing like that.
There is something like that from (metal gear solid) where a warhead can be used from a railgun system other than conventional rockets to deliver a warhead by using high voltage solanoid prepultion with magnetic build up for repel forces greater than that of  other delivery mechanisms in irans arsenal.
The nazis where working on many electro propulsion concepts one being near the shores of  normandy it was called the V3  but you wont find it on jewtube but its was kinda like the metal gear solid stealth nuke that i might add iran now have from the stealth fighter that crashed there wow a stealth nuke from american made spy tech.

+4

Undo

=D 16.04.2012 16:42

jews invented nothing; have you ever seen a leach inventing anything? Nope. And in retrospect an 'Islamofascist' is an oxymoron, but heck it's good to be an 'Islamofascist' than a parasites. =D

+9

Undo

jgarbuz 09.02.2012 03:09

Jews invented the atomic bomb for America, and even the USSR had some help from Jewish spies, so only the Jewish state, Israel alone, has the true right to have them in the first place! The Islamofascist Republic of Iran signed the Nuclear Non-Prolifration Treaty and therefor has NO right to have them. There is already a Muslim nuclear state, Pakistan, and it has been the worst proliferator to date, having provided parts and knowhow to North Korea, Libya and probably Iran as well. The Islamofascist Republic has threatened to wipe out Israel and had even threatened and used terror against Americans as well.

They have no right to the bomb, and must be stopped at any cost, just as Hitler should have been stopped in the late 1930s. If not, woe unto the world. Remember, people once thought that Hitler was only a Jewish problem, and now they believe Iran is only Israel's problem. They will find out otherwise if Iran is not stopped dead in its tracks.

0

Undo

arabdhow 08.02.2012 21:30

Israel has been banging on for decades about Irans supposed nuclear capability.
Another contrived  ruse to set the stage for an illegal, pre-emptive and (most likely) 'false flag' strike against Iran?  Any excuse to justify military intervention.
Why shouldn't Iran have a nuclear weapons capability? Because Israel and America says so?
No two nuclear capable countries are insane enough to use them against one another.  It's suicide and their leaders know it.
What if China, Pakistan or Russia supplied Iran with weapons grade material as the USA has probably done for Israel?
There will be no  peace for Israel in my opinion. It  never has had any serious intentions to accommodate Palestinian aspirations.
Seizure of arab lands in the occupied west bank and the building of Jewish settlements have been relentless for decades.

+15

Undo

SeanNY 07.02.2012 14:10

I am an American patriot, however I am against the US sticking its nose in any other countries foreign affairs unless it directly effects us. The Isreali lobby is very powerful here as you know but believe it or not many Americans are against being  involved in any other war(most didnt want the two we're in now). With that said I think many of you know that our politicians are puppets to much stronger and influential powers...ie multi-national corporations, the super-elite and so forth. To play devils advocate though, Iran has on many occasions threatened Isreal with obliteration, that did not help there cause for nuclear ambitions. The US should close its boarders, mind its own business and let the world sort out its own problems. No one will come to our aid if we need it, we are hated amongst the world, for good reason. Our industrial war complex is hungry for blood. But please know that the majority of the population here are ignorant to such things and havent had their eyes opened to it yet.  

+24

Undo

John (unregistered) 07.02.2012 03:18

Its ok for a country to have nuclear weapons but not when Iran blantantly threatens to use it on Israel. Iran talks sh*t about everybody, the president is a clown, there asking for an a** whooping

-97

Undo

No Blood 4 Oil 06.02.2012 12:26

Lol...! Very funny, US have nuke facilities, Israel have nuke facilities, so why Iran can't have it...?  

+53

Undo

shu 05.02.2012 18:56

israel couldn't stop Hizbollah (a minor organizat ion) and they're gonna stop Iran? lol

+47

Undo

Kafantaris 05.02.2012 05:21

Though Europe and the United States are accelerating economic sanctions in an effort to appease Israel, it plans to attack Iran anyway.  One might start to wonder which of these two is now the more rogue state in the Middle East.Should Israel surgically attack Iran, as it had done Iraq twenty years ago, we can expect Iran to return fire.   And Iran might have unknown weapons in its arsenal and unknown ways to use them. The question then becomes to what extent do we help Israel when it picks a fight with Iran?If the U.S. helps it unconditionally, as it had done before, then we risk retaliation from Iran on our nearby facilities. The same is true for european countries which are all within a striking distance of Iran.  So what do we do, sit back and not help a friend trying to make the world a safer place for the rest of us?In this case, perhaps. If Israel wants to bomb Iran on its own terms, when it wants to and how it wants to, then it can also stand ready to fend for itself when Iran returns fire.  To let it assume otherwise is irresponsible since it encourages rogue action on the expectation of help.  With the world on the mend from a profound economic downturn, such foreseeable misstep should be avoided. Does this mean then that we  should resign ourselves to a nuclear Iran? George W. Bush may have thought so, as he may have thought the same about a nuclear North Korea.   And despite his and Dick Cheney's professed love for Israel, they might have been looking for new friend in the Middle East when they toppled Saddam.  Iraq did not prove a friend, but it has proved that U.N. inspections can work because the UN teams had destroyed all of its weapons of mass destruction. Wh o knows, in time our economic sanctions might also slow down Iran.  If not, having nuclear Iran --  or nuclear anyone else -- is something the rest of us can learn to live with. Maybe Israel should too.  And conduct itself accordingly.  

0

Undo

Shahab 04.02.2012 20:20

Another WMD in Iraq!? Fool me Once.

+17

Undo

Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us