Iran threatens to attack any country that assists 'enemies'
February 05, 2012 18:07
A senior Iranian military official says Tehran will attack any country used by "enemies" to launch a military strike against his country. The statement comes amid growing tensions between Iran and the West.
Supernova777 wrote in #3
Stop fighting friends.I'm an Iranian but love Jewish people and Americans.In return I expect their respect to my nation and culture as well.The ultimate solution is NEGOTIATION
I t is pointless to negotiate with Bully who is constantly and openly calling to attack your nation even with Nuclear bomb! But as you mentioned, we must love all the peace loving people no matter what nationality, faith or color the have but we must stay away from the bully in this case the Satan.
Iran puts these toy soldiers marching and saying thing the government tells them to say. They try to act like military men, all they are doing is marching like toy soldiers, when face with the real military men they'll all run for the hills like Iraqi's did when face whit the real thing. They are bunch of blow hearts. Iranian people wake up and see what your so called government is really interested in.
It's not taking care of it's people, that's for sure.
Stop fighting friends.I'm an Iranian but love Jewish people and Americans.In return I expect their respect to my nation and culture as well.The ultimate solution is NEGOTIATION
Iran has every right to defend its borders as well as its people against the evil empire and its parasitic partner,Isreal. I sreal has good reasons to get concerned about the ever growing Iranś military superiority in the region, a situation that is likely to threaten the zionist expansionist programme of stealing Arab land. The Arab leaders in the middle East,whose stomachs are full with pok meat and their heads dazed with the best wine all imported from the USA,are not able to figure out the threat that Isreal poses to them. They have been totally brainwashed and reduced to just biological substances,so useless and stupid that they can incite NATO aggression against their fellow Islamic countries such as Libya,Syria and Iran. These well-fed and intoxicated Arabs have never called for,let alone mention,an international protection for their brothers and sisters,the Palestinians,who are being killed on daily basis by the Zionists. There are some political dwarfs and vampires in western countries who are opposed to Russiaś role of attempting to maintain peace in the region. Regime change and wars have not and will not bring democracy or peace in any country:Iraq and Afghanistan are good and clear examples. The World needs peace and not the senseless and destructive wars that the devilish bloodsuckers in Western countries have been pushing for. Western countries must find honest and peaceful means of fixing up their failing economy without shedding blood.
I fully support the point of Brian and SWN.When Russians invested 25 bilion in Iraq oil industry the same year Iraqis were accused and invaded by the British and theAmericans in the name of WMD in 2003.Unfortu nately the Americans does not have testing field for their nuclear weapons and the only way how to test them is to provoke Iranians to a extent to justify the attack. The hidden agenda beyond this is to make sure when the misile defend system is in place the Chinees and and Russians wont be a threat to their nuclear weapons.Remmember the countries that we all have love are the biggest threat to the world today like USA a nd core.
NATO missile shield business in Turkey is the problem.USA has atomic bomb bases in Germany,Israell and very soon may be from Bulgaria ,which is targeted towards east via Turkey`s air space and is meant to deter Iran.Iran`s warning against any country ,who assist western imperialism ,is in a way , an ultimatum to Azerbaijan`s
(misgu ided) Ali yev and
(traitor and a sellout) Sakash vill of Georgia.And as for Turkey,who are regarded friendly by Iranians, nevertheless in case of any threat by west or invasion of Syria,despite all that mutual respect,the anti-missile shield is the first target.Nobody likes to see a NATO city in Kurdistan ,therefore,the notion of such projects should be nipped in the bud.Period.
Announcing that someone will defend itself is in no way a threat! Iran keeps defending it's population and land... They do not more than declaring what they will do in case of an attack from abroad. That's no threat at all.
I'm not sure that Iran should be using 'aggressive' language in the case that NATO friendly nations deliberately misrepresent their words as another false pretext for war against Iran.
Iran is doing fine watching the EU bloc nations and US/Israel shoot themselves in the foot with their futile economic sanctions.
As a sovereign nation Iran can do anything to defend itself. They can retaliate as best they can. Targets can not always be military. Destroying the enemy's will to fight by attacking the civilian supporters of the military and the government is a well established method of warfare. Remember: When you do it, it is an atrocity and when I do it, it is collateral damage.
If RT doesn't allow obscene words, which there were NONE in my post, the "editors" might want to view the previous posts. I guess my post didn't agree with the views of RT. I will look else where for my news. Thanks.
Comments (48) Sort by: highest rating oldest first newest first
Alexi 26.03.2012 10:09
Undo
Alireza (unregistered) 26.03.2012 10:05
Undo
Alireza (unregistered) 26.03.2012 09:48
Undo
brianmoloney 16.03.2012 16:31
Undo
Batman (unregistered) 27.02.2012 05:46
Undo
Supernova777 11.02.2012 03:47
Undo
Tom Sad 08.02.2012 21:17
Undo
Xolile 07.02.2012 16:33
Undo
amjad 06.02.2012 18:09
Undo
Perez 06.02.2012 12:55
Undo
arifkarim 06.02.2012 11:23
Undo
arifkarim 06.02.2012 11:18
Undo
Dariush 06.02.2012 11:16
Undo
Mahlknecht 06.02.2012 06:47
Undo
RTrocks 06.02.2012 06:08
Undo
thomaspain 06.02.2012 05:51
Undo
Josh Jaye 06.02.2012 05:47
Undo
The Light 06.02.2012 05:46
Undo
Add comment
By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules
Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.