NATO will stay in Libya as long as necessary – Rasmussen
June 09, 2011 13:03
NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen has told RT that despite the growing number of casualties among civilians in Libya, NATO is staying in the country to protect its population against Gaddafi’s attacks.
Comments (21)
Sort by:
highest ratingoldest firstnewest first
Jose (unregistered)08.09.2012 22:41
It covers alot of true FACTS, ecpext it pawns-off all the FACTS that the real fighters were all organized, trained and FINANCED by the CIA/MOSSAD/MI6, etc.Why does AP become so self-righteous, after the damage is done? AP was happy to edit real news, to broadcast, transmit and publish 100% of the LIES against the legitimate Libyan Government.Now they portray themselves as a squeaky-clean, objective news-service.
Israel controls NATO. The United States is in Libya to protect Israel and to ensure Israel can surpvive. Period.
And despite people's understanding of this relationship, there's not a damned thing you can do about it, because we'll just cry anti-semitism. We always get what we want because we're the world's parasites!!
Dream on Rasmussen! The time of US, NATO and Coalition lies and crusades is OVER! People are awake and no longer simple sheep. Your "protection of civilians" lies would be laughable if they weren't pathetic.Civilians need protection from YOU.NATO led by US has committed more genocide and killings of innocent civili ans then any war in history of human kind.
Whil e your specific points are completely valid Re accuracy of weapons:
Seri ously friend I'm Australian , what has Libya got that England needs? you know, step back, the big picture:
On a strict risk / reward basis where is there any advantage for the commonwealth ? and what are the risks? I feel things are becoming crazy.
you do know, most people don't see or buy the "humanitarian war"cover, don't you?
we are heading towards comedy style legitimacy. an exaggerated fictional reality. i think it's much funnier than the Soviet style propaganda, if it wasn't possibly leading to the end of the world.
So according to our White crap at NATO,it is okay to kill civilians as long as they not a western ally.PS Ask that prat Ragmussen who ask Nato to intervene.
I wish the question on whether he is using depleted uranium when bombing Libya. If his answer was no then the next question should have been – Have you personally checked the bombs? If the answer is no then ask – What is the “name” of the person/s that did check the bombs?
I don't trust this natos, they're behaving as though they got the world as hostage, and will do what ever they want with it. They have to be stop. Russia should not trust them. By when they have build their military traps all around you, they will come after you and force their wills on you and drag you down to extreme misery. It better to stop them now that they are still building. Before it b/comes too late. I would even suggest Russia and China combine to assist Africa get the United State and make it their ally.
Comments (21) Sort by: highest rating oldest first newest first
Jose (unregistered) 08.09.2012 22:41
Undo
An Israeli 23.06.2011 16:23
Undo
ggggggggggg 17.06.2011 16:50
Undo
Karen Marlow 16.06.2011 20:52
Undo
9ke9 10.06.2011 13:49
Undo
9ke9 10.06.2011 13:28
Undo
joseph walker 10.06.2011 13:16
Undo
Peter Link 10.06.2011 13:07
Undo
9ke9 10.06.2011 10:04
Undo
Barnabas 10.06.2011 06:30
Undo
kebila 10.06.2011 06:03
Undo
Add comment
By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules
Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.