European missile defense shield up and running – NATO

Published time: May 21, 2012 00:44
Edited time: May 22, 2012 10:31
Anders Fogh Rasmussen (Kevork Djansezian / Getty Images / AFP)
Download video (26.97 MB)
Embed

The European missile shield is up and running, says NATO Secretary-General Fogh Rasmussen, who announced its “interim capability” to shoot down incoming missiles. Earlier Russia voiced strong concern over the issue.

The "interim operational capability"declared by Rasmussen at the NATO summit in Chicago on Sunday is the first step to fulfilling the controversial scheme to defend the whole of Europe against ballistic missile attacks. The final stage, planned for 2022, is also set to provide coverage for the United States from Europe.

Moscow has repeatedly stating its concern, demanding legal guarantees from the alliance that the shield will NOT be targeting Russia’s nuclear capabilities.

Rasmussen stressed that NATO must be able to defend itself against missile threats, and said the move "cannot be blocked by Russia", it's a NATO decision.

However, NATO leaders have sought to appease Russia’s anger over the system by renewing an invitation to work with the alliance. “We have invited Russia to cooperate on missile defense and this invitation still stands", Rasmussen told a news conference.“We will continue our dialogue with Russia and I hope that at a certain stage Russia will realize that it is in our common interest to cooperate on missile defense."

NATO continues to insist that the shield is not aimed at Russia.

“The US never attempted seriously to reach a realistic compromise with Russia,” considers political analyst and writer Rick Rozoff. He recalled the American ambassador saying last December that the US is going to deploy interceptor missile systems in Europe “whether Russia likes it or not”.

“That is certainly diplomatic talk,” mocks Rozoff.

During the summit, Francois Hollande, France’s new president, laid out his country’s conditions for support of the antimissile initiative and said other countries, including Russia, should not feel threatened by it.

Earlier, Moscow warned that it is prepared to use "destructive force preemptively” if the US goes ahead with the missile defense system based in Central Europe.

­

‘No rush for the exit’ from Afghanistan

Afghanistan dominated the summit’s agenda, with leaders quarrelling over the pullout strategy. Most continued to support the 2014 troop withdrawal deadline, though the newly inaugurated French President, Francois Hollande, indicated that he was not going to backtrack on his campaign promise for an early pullout.

US President Barack Obama stressed that it was important to maintain unity as the mission draws to an end. “Just as we have sacrificed together for our common security, we will stand together united in our determination to complete this mission,” he said during the summit’s opening session, as quoted by Reuters

His words were echoed by German Chancellor Angela Merkel. “We went into Afghanistan together, we want to leave Afghanistan together", she told reporters.

Anders Fogh Rasmussen also stressed that it was important to “maintain solidarity,” and that “there will be no rush for the exits."

But Francois Hollande said he will stick to his decision to pull his country’s troops out of Afghanistan by this year’s end, arguing that it was “pragmatic”.

General John Allen, commander of the joint ISAF troops in Afghanistan, downplayed the impact of France’s decision. “We have the capacity, using our current force structure, to ensure there is no degradation in security,” he said.

Another contentious issue on the table is funding for the Afghan police and security forces. The US, not keen on being the only benefactor, is hoping its allies would chip in with US$1.3 billion.

Also invited to the summit was Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardar, whom the US is also hoping to coax into reopening supply routes for NATO troops in Afghanistan which were closed after a US aircraft killed 24 Pakistani soldiers last November.

­

‘No intention’ to intervene in Syria

The issue of Syria was also touched on by the NATO Secretary-General. While Rasmussen voiced concern over violence in the country and urged the Syrian regime to comply with the UN ceasefire and peace plan, he indicated that NATO had “no intention” of taking military action against Syria.

We strongly condemn the behavior of the Syrian security forces and their crackdowns on the Syrian population and we urge the Syrian leadership to accommodate the legitimate aspirations of the Syrian people,” he said during a news conference. “But again NATO has no intention to intervene in Syria.”

Meanwhile, Italian Prime Minister Mario Monti was forced to leave the summit early following a deadly earthquake in the north of his country, and a fatal bombing in the south.


Comments (117)

Coward WEST (unregistered) 22.05.2012 05:42

AN EVIL NATO THUG (like you wanted) (unregistered) wrote in #1
Russia will be charred and its graveyard filled, if Kremlin decides to go pre-emptive.
-------------------- --------we will see, be around by that time, if you not fried by russian missiles.  you gonna get what Napolean and Hitler got, Histroy REPEATS by itself.

+1

Undo

bladdersmeer puttin (unregistered) 22.05.2012 04:01

Remember when the USSR was friends with Hitler and the Allies had to help them? Do they still not get it? Iran is nobody's friend.  History is repeating itself.          The missles are for Iran. Just look at all the things Iran messes up on: 1-Rezā Shāh was good friends with Hitler 2-Mossadegh the communist 3-Iran Ajr, when Iran placed sea mines in the gulf to blow up US subs 4-Iran hangs out with the wrong international crowds consistently 5-and now nuclear energy...good idea Iran, bunch of dumbazzes, who can trust them? It's silly for Russia and China to.

0

Undo

A.Smith (unregistered) 22.05.2012 02:00

And the evil curtain of the Satanical Zionists has fallen, now their evil agenda of WW3 against Russia, China is fully exposed and even US President Obama is performing a victory dance.

Now Russia must position their Persian Missile like tactical nuclear ballistic missiles to strike the NATO missile shield radar installiations as well as determine IF the Silo missiles being positioned against Russia and China under the guise of being 'ABMs' are not full ICBM's tipped with MIRV'd nuclear warheads or not.

Europe should learn from WW1 and WW2 to not encourage WW3 and yet the Satanically evil Zionists are once again deliberately trying to drag Europe into WW3.

Russia, China should stop all pretense in regarding USA/Israel as attempting to build peace, instead Russia, China should attempt to catch up in stopping the Zionist contrived US Pentagon Operation Anaconda encircling and strangling the life out of Russia, China with ABM missile bases, UAV assassination bases and then daring Russia, China, North Korea to stand up against US/Israel, UK's offensive weapons as the West steals the remaining natural resources across Africa and the Artic Regions further isolating Russia and China in the process.

Chin a has the vast majority of rare earth elements to stop the infernal Zionist run-away endless war machine and Russia has the ICBM and technical might to enforce Syria and Iran against wave after wave of cruise missiles.

Rus sia should respond to this latest act of direct provocation by delivering S-400 anti-aircraft, anti-cruise missile battery's across Iran to guard Iran's Russian completed nuclear reactor and Russian technicians.

+17

Undo

View all comments (117)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us