Palestinian statehood bid on the ropes?

Published time: November 11, 2011 14:11
Edited time: November 14, 2011 14:28
A Palestinian stone thrower faces off with an Israeli soldier (AFP Photo / Abbas Momani)
Download video (30.5 MB)
Embed

The Palestinian drive for independence may have hit another roadblock, as the UN Security Council’s membership committee is expected to approve a draft report Friday stating it has failed to reach a unanimous conclusion on the bid.

­While Palestine would almost certainly obtain the two-thirds majority in the 193-member General Assembly necessary for approval, the 15 members of the Security Council appear to have thrown a wrench in the works.

The United States could yield their veto power if Palestine managed to get nine out of 15 votes, but it appears the Palestinians have only managed to secure eight supporters.  

While Russia, China, Brazil, India, Lebanon, South Africa, Gabon and Nigeria all stand behind the Palestinian bid, the US is firmly against it.  Meanwhile, the remaining six members are expected to either vote ‘no’, or abstain. 

The Palestinians claim the reluctance of members like France and Germany to support their cause is down to extensive US arm-twisting behind the scenes.   

If the committee does approve the draft report on the impasse, the issue will be sent back to the Security Council, which can either shelve it, or go ahead with a vote.  

The Palestinians could still demand a vote, even if the Security Council attempts to sidestep the issue.  However, besides forcing Security Council members to publicly justify their decision, Palestinians would equally expose their own lack of support.

If the Security Council fails to vote on the application, the Palestinians also have the option of pursuing upgraded observer status within the UN.  Although they wouldn’t have voting rights, they could join a number of UN agencies, and would merely need to secure a majority vote before the UN General Assembly.

It is not only the Palestinian membership in the UN which is at stake now – but the entire two-state paradigm pressed on by the West, remarks Sam Bahour, an American-Palestinian business activist and writer.

The approach to the UN is less about the membership of Palestine in the UN, but more about challenging the West’s inability to whack the work of the two-state paradigm. What we see is 44 years of the West, specifically the US, making a case for two states. But in the first real test of bringing two states about it has failed to move the paradigm forward,” Bahour told RT.

Washington seems to be “on the wrong side of history in this issue” as most of the world’s community supports the Palestinian bid, believes the American-Palestinian writer. Denying the Autonomy a UN seat, the US leaves it with too few tools to win statehood.

Watch RT’s full interview with Sam Bahour


The Palestinians have long sought to establish a sovereign state based on 1967 borders, which would include the West Bank, Gaza, and East Jerusalem. However, as decades of peace talks have failed to produce a result, President of the Palestinian Authority Mahmoud Abbas sought to kick start the process by applying for full UN membership on September 23. 

Late last month, the Palestinian drive for statehood was advanced further when the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) voted to receive Palestine.  With 107 voting yes, 14 voting no, and 52 abstaining, it was the first time Palestinians achieved full membership status within a UN body.

Comments (6)

Mark (unregistered) 09.08.2012 19:40

In compliance with the 1920 League of Nations Resolution, two-state solution was implemented in 1922 when british administration of occupied Israel allocated more than 70% of Israel territory to palestinian arabs and created Transjordan (now Jordan) where today over 90 percent of the population identify themselves as Palestinian Arabs. Every party, including UN, EU, US, etc., must respect League of Nations Resolutions, adopted and accepted by UN in 1945. Therefore, all so called "palestinians" must be relocated there. Enough stealing Israel land. Britain and Jordan must compensate Israel for stolen land and natural resources. History of “palestinians”Ar ticle 24 of the 1964 PLO Charter addressed to UN stipulates: "Palestinian muslims do not exercise authority over West Bank (Judea and Samaria) and Gaza territories” Arab leaders like Auni Bey Abdul-Hadi told the Peel Commission in 1937: "There is no such country as 'Palestine'; 'Palestine' is a term the Zionists invented!" In 1946, Arab historian Philip Hitti testified before the Anglo-American Committee of Inquiry that "there is no such thing as Palestine in history.”

0

Undo

Benjy 16.11.2011 10:54

   &n bsp;   We urge the Palestinians to go full-on to the Security Council and ask for a vote! We would like to know the scambags who taut human rights as wares, who would vote against them!

+2

Undo

Count Cash 13.11.2011 09:28

Russia will vote to support the UN and widely accepted across the world two state solution, which entails the recognition of Palestine. If and when the Native Americans, or any others raise a case for recognition and land return in the UN, then that will be dealt with as well, in a similarly open fashion. This case however is well worked up, is very current, and already has a consensus that Palestine should exist as a state, to deny that statehood now would be total hypocrisy, from anyone that claims to hold to values of self determination…. Should any other case raise such a level, then of course it will be dealt with in the same manner. But of course these other cases, if initiated will take time, and many will lack even basic consensus, so will die along the way, so introducing them now into this discussion, can only be considered as a smoke screen or fig leaf to cover a grossly hypocritical position with respect to Palestine today.

+3

Undo

View all comments (6)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us