EBU denies faking Eurovision voting results
Published: 20 May, 2009, 18:29
Russia 's entry into the 2009 Eurovision song contest Anastasia Prikhodko (AFp Photo / Dmitry Kosyukov)
TAGS: Music, Russia, Ukraine, Eurovision, Europe
A European Broadcasting Union (EBU) official denies Ukraine’s claims about faking viewers’ and the jury’s voting results towards the Ukrainian-born participant representing Russia at Eurovision in Moscow.
Svante Stockselius, the EBU spokesperson, confirmed that the voting results, announced in the Final of the Song Contest were absolutely correct, and the voting was held according to the rules of the competition.
“The dispute which arose around the results of Ukraine’s voting was due to misunderstanding the system of bringing together the results of viewers’ and jury voting," Stockselius says.
The EBU official’s statement also included the decryption of Ukraine’s voting towards some of the participating countries. Ukrainians granted their 12 points – the highest appreciation, to Anastasia Prikhodko. However, the professional jury did not vote for her at all. It placed the Russian contestant in third place in Ukraine giving her a total of 8 points.
Two days earlier, on May 18, a scandal arose due to the head of Ukrainian jury, Roman Nedzelsky. He initiated addressing an official claim to the EBU with a request to explain how it could happen that Prikhodko, who was given zero points from the jury and the maximum 8 from the viewers, could have come in third in Ukraine’s voting. He insisted that extra votes from the state were unfairly imputed to Prikhodko.
“We did not control the SMS voting, but we knew the decision of the professional jury. We did not give Russia any points… It’s an ordinary manipulation,” Nedzelsky said.
However, the offended Ukrainians still think Russia should have given higher appreciation to their contestant Svetlana Loboda, who received 2 points from Russia. “I’m very grateful for the Russian 2 points for Ukraine. It’s very generous and neighborly of them,” Nedzelsky said with irony.
It’s not the first time Ukraine has tried to throw a shadow on the image of Russia. They said the voting for Dima Bilan, the winner of last year’s Eurovision in Belgrade, also came out first unfairly.
18.05.2009, 19:48
Tale in the DarknessNikolay Khomeriki’s latest motion picture depicts a female police officer dealing with minors in the Russian Far East, but will the true-to-life drama find its audiences in the South of France? |
21.05.2009, 20:18
Major classical music festival kicks off in St. PetersburgOver 100 concerts and performances will be presented as part of the seventeenth musical festival “Stars of the White Nights,” supervised by maestro Valery Gergiev. |
The final result based on voters and jury was fair enough regarding Norway as it deserved to be the winner of the ESC 2009. What seemed surprising somehow, was the second, third and fourth places which were given to Iceland, Azerbaijan and Turkey respectively... I think either the system used failed or it should be reviewed and changed as appropriate because the unfairness was obvious considering the outstanding performances of Croatia, Spain, Portugal, Moldova, Ukraine and Armenia, just to name a few countries, which remained in the shadow!
Typical European attitude, we don't like the result, so change the system. Just keep changing it until it agrees with what we want. This attitude is what makes the EU, the political cesspit of the world. Just whingeing and political bickering, the halmark of the EU. Every one has their own taste, everyone can have a view, that one entry was better than the other. But that is all it is; a view. The competition ran, and those were the results folks, like it or not. There was alot of effort put in by all the entrants, so appreciate that, and stop trying to do the EU whingeing and politicisation rubbish.