Apollo hardware is certainly still on Moon – expert
Published: 20 July, 2009, 13:51
Edited: 13 September, 2010, 05:43
TAGS: Space, Interview, SciTech
Space analyst Yury Karash says allegations that the US lunar exploration program was a hoax are groundless, as numerous pieces of evidence show.
The expert talked with RT about the prospects of a return to the Moon, expected in a matter of a decade, and which nations he expects to be part of the effort.
18.07.2009, 01:36
2 comments
Wildlife crisis worse than economic crisis – IUCNLife on Earth is under a serious threat. World leaders fail to reverse the trend by 2010 despite commitments made in 2002. |
22.07.2009, 11:59
Electrocar will charge like plug-free toothbrushNissan has scaled up the plug-free battery charging technology used in electric toothbrushes and some powered razors to fit their upcoming electrocar. |
I think you mean the Van Allen Belt. The average satellite with 3mm of aluminum protection, receives 2500 rems a year, or 25 sieverts passing the belts in its regular orbit. That's 2500 rem/year. The guaranteed lethal dosage is 1000 within a very short term. Now, having protection from the spacecract, plus the spacesuit, would likely mean less than 2500. Assuming even one day was spent in the Van Allen belts(it really was a few minutes for the high energy inner belt and 1.5 hours for the lower energy outer belt). Going with the 2500 rems, disregarding greater protection provided than what satellites have, 2500 rems a year = 0.285 rems a hour. At 1.5 hours total time, .428 rems. Up to 50 for one year, or 100 over 5 is considerd safe. So radiation isn't an issue.
The evidence and hardware could have been planted? Oh please! After the first landing, why did we keep going there if it was staged? It wasnt staged. This belongs in the same pile as 9-11 was an inside job and, my favorite, there is an alien/human breeding progam going on. CIA funded, of course.
Anyone who believes that the U.S. staged moon landings needs to take that up with Alexei Leonov.He will gladly disagree.