What Nato means by "No Fly Zone" is No Fly Zone for Assad's planes. The rest air force for Rebels okay.

Wonder how Russia will respond with their SAMs on those intruders from Nato or USA.

As for Syria, she can shoot down a few ... but best is to hide those assets in the early stages. Let them bomb dummies .... and ride it out .

Nato cannot fight without air force ... and that is why they are sooooooo frustrated when Russia vetoed and stationed their ships ever ready to watch the skies of Syria

Surprisingly, of all comments no one took some time to reveal the one common character in all Sarkozy-Jewppe and Holande-Fabius teams. All four are Jews.
Western political and social stature has been humiliated and trashed by Jews. The entire boastful democracy in the West is now tamed and controlled by Jews. No matter who and how you vote, you end up with a Jew or a Jew-leashed in office. So no policy, especially foreign policy will change.

Renae, nobody wants war.  A mild amount of logic penetrates most propaganda. 

The rebels have mostly kalishnakov and homemade bombs.  Neither of these weapons is of western manufacture.   This means that the weapons priovided by qatar have not arrived yet.  The regime has tanks, artillery, apc, helicopters.  The regime controls from the med to the mountains and is now battling to keep control of the cities.  These are obvious facts that can be gleaned from the articles printed here on RT.  Now, apply some logic to those facts. 

How is it possible for rebels to control such large swaths of land with such inferior weapons?  As the number of rebels continues to grow will the regimes weapons advantage increase or decrease?  Will Assad deploy more powerful weapons to compensate for being outnumbered?  If more powerful weapons are deployed then will the rebels surrender, seek to aquire more powerful weapons, and/or deploy more merciless strategies?

All things considered, the best way to avoid spilling oceans of syrian blood is for the west and soviets to block each other from shipping any advanced weapons to either side.  As they do so, it will play out in the media as accusations and counter-accusations.   The best position for either russia or europe is to block each other.  Both are fully capable of bypassing blockades.  As long as neither side goes first then not as much Syrian blood will be spilled.

dexxie (unregistered) wrote in #7
I just dont get the people that are craving for war. No dudes, war isnt good, any kind of it.

The whole point here is to do what is better for the Surian people and not ask for nuclear wars and retarded staff like that.
The Syrian people already know what's good for them, and it ain't Western bombs. Yet the West has driven the world off a cliff and towards extinction. Nothing like a good ol' war to settle issues, is the stance of the US. But this one will be the last one for humanity. Nobody wants war but war profiteers who reside in the US and Congressmen. But I'm afraid that America will get more war for which it bargained. What a doomed pathetic lot the US people are, not even realizing WWIII is nearly upon us.

Ricky1962 writes: No matter how much you Kikels and Yankee Doodle Dandies repeat the lie it will not make it true. I guess you have to bolster yourselves up for the azz whipping you are about to get all the way around. Death to American and Israwhore.  

grow up.  1970 technology that was lucky to hit a 1960 aircraft.  Everybody knows that russian technology is not so good.  it is big and bulky and always 20 years behind.  Japanese guy goes to Moscow and is sitting at corner using ipad.  Russdian guy comes up and says his soviet designed version is better.  He shows japanese guy all the things his computer can do that ipad can't.  bus arrives and japanese guy gets on it.  Soviet guy can't leave because battery for his computer weighs 500KG.

I already told you that I did some research and asked an expert in the field - you do not have a doctorate in engineering do you? No I did not think so. You just do not like the truth. You are just a crank who comes on here and speak Zionist, American zhit and then thinks we are all going to just eat it up and be shaking in our boots. I will be laughing most whole heatedly whe n American Air Force planes come crashing out of the sky and dead American airmen are being brought back to the States. I shall remember to urinate on their graves like I do already - baby rapists and baby killers. 

Captain America (unregistered) wrote in #4
o (unregistered) wrote in #2
the s 300 will take care of any no fly zone,evan it can evan pop a raptor like a cheap date
You clearly have NO CLUE what you're talking about. Do a little research and you will find the s-300 does not have the capability to shoot down the F-22 Raptor, F-117 NightHawk or B-2 Spirit.





_________ ____________________ ____________________ ______



Ricky1962 writes: Somehow I don't feel that someone taking the cartoon name Captain America should be listen too with any seriousness regarding military issues. Also, having read a little on this and then having asked a US Air Force Reserve pilot at the college where I teach history (he teaches aerospace  dynamic in the engineering department) about this, he said such a claim as you make is pure rubbish and that Russia's missiles should be able to take down US military planes. He also pointed out that Russia most likely has other stuff there in Syria that they are making sure does not come out till hostilities begin - surprise. Captain America ah? It also sounds like a screen name for homosexual pornography of some sort. I bet you love being the bottom to a Zionist Jew. 

Actually, the S-300 is arguably the only system able to defend against the F-22. 

For once the west should allow the Arab world to solve it's own problem.

the s 300 will take care of any no fly zone,evan it can evan pop a raptor like a cheap date

To the person who responded first to my comment (sorry you did not give a name) - I found your response very interesting and it was a good analysis of the situation. Thank you.