During the NATO bombing in Yugoslavia (now Serbia) in 1999 our satellite TV channel was shut down and our satellite base station bombed in order not to share Belgrade's point of view, as well as war atrocities made by NATO-backed Albanian forces.

Besid es, the main building of our national TV has been bombed while civilian workers were inside, all that without any warning.

Also , the Chinese embassy has been hit and destroyed with several missiles, and NATO has blamed "old maps" for the "mistake"...

Finally, NATO used graphite bombs to destroy high-voltage power lines in the power grid between power plants and cities, so we couldn't keep food in fridges and freezers and had to either eat it quickly or discard it.

How humanitarian, isn't it.

These facts are now forgotten in the world media, but we in Serbia remember very well what happened and how.

Well said! However you do realise you are trying to reason with the unreasonable here don't you? You omit to mention how RT will often pick one view, often leftfield and extremist and publish claiming it as news/fact when indeed it is not. It is a common ploy used by RT and swallowed by the gullible. SMJ

African Child (unregistered) wrote in #18
We no longer have true journalism. Read the news and make your own judgements. Afterall the cliche now is for CNN, BBC, Aljazeera, Fox, Skynews, Guardian et all to say 'we cannot independently verify these reports because the government restricts access by foreign journalist'. This comes after you must have spent 30 minutes reading their writeup or watching their broadcast. Thats why we come to RT ...
The difference between the media you list above and RT is that the former are professionalists and know when to say "cannot be independently verified" and when to correct wrong reports. Unlike RT, a state-owned propaganda channel, who make up things and find the right person who would regurgitate their story. Lack of any criticism should not be mistaken with good journalism.