The control of the US, and of global politics, by the wealthiest families of the planet is exercised in a powerful, profound and clandestine manner.
This control began in Europe and has a continuity that can be traced back to the time when the bankers discovered it was more profitable to give loans to governments than to needy individuals.

These banking families and their subservient beneficiaries have come to  own most major businessses over the two centuries and increasingly organised themselves as controllers of governments worldwide and as arbiters of war and peace.

Unless we understand this we will be unable to understand the real reasons for the two world wars and the impending Third World War, a war that is almost certain to begin as a consequence of the US attempt to seize and control Central Asia.  The only way out is for the US to back off - something the people of the US and the world want,  but the elite does not.

The US is a country controlled trough the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank, which in turn is controlled by the handful of banking families that established it by deception in the first place.

This all-powerful group has remained superior because it had learned the walue of anonymity.  This "High Cabal" is the "One World Cabal" of today, also called the elite by some.

(I borrowed this from Prof. Dr. M. Kamran)

boxer adrynov.

Eliza wrote in #14
Bert, your problem is that you do not see that so called "conspiracy theories" more and more prooved themselvs to be a true.
These "theories" were jeered at only by those who were compromised by them.

bert wrote in #11
The problem with Engdahl and others like him is that they bring a lot of conspiracy theories into the world based on only those assumptions which underpin their theory. A lot of times it's circle reasoning which don't bring anyone anywhere.Start talking with the other instead of talking about the other and then solutions may come in sight.
-- -
Theories have to be adapted to stay appropriate. However one can construct every arbitrarily theory bordered with assumptions that gives room to a desired conclusion. And then say: 'Look, this is truth,' within the defined borders of the taken assumptions.Everybod y knows that a false assumptions will always give false conclusions. That's pure logic, nothing more or less.And 'becoming true?' If one of those might become (partly) true, it would not suprise me when those who think they see such a theory within the acts of others are contributing to it with their deeds, making it a selffulfilling prophecy.