UNSC unanimously extends Syria observer mission for 'final' 30 days

Published time: July 20, 2012 15:06
Edited time: July 20, 2012 23:58
AFP Photo / Don Emmert
Download video (32.08 MB)
Embed

The UN Security Council has voted for a technical extension for the UN observer mission in Syria for 30 days as the previous one expires on July 20.

The new extension comes as UNSC members work out a compromise of two proposals on the table – one by Pakistan, which suggested extending the mission for 45 days, and the other by Britain, which offered a 30-day extension. However, Britain’s offer came with the condition that Assad withdraws all troops from residential neighborhoods.

The draft resolution was submitted by France, Germany, Portugal, and the UK.

Russia’s envoy to the UN, Vitaly Churkin, said that the resolution was called final because some members of the UN Security Council wanted “to send a political signal” and “to put some pressure on both sides,” but the resolutions may be prolonged if both sides halted the violence.

“We are glad because, first of all, the resolution is balanced and second, we appreciate the role the UN mission observers have played and will play in the Syrian conflict. We were the initiators who launched this mission, that is why we believe that is important to extend it,” Russia’s Ambassador to the UN said.

The US envoy to the UN Susan Rice explained that the resolution is called "final" as 30 days is the limit within which the mission should be withdrawn safely and in “an orderly fashion.” If the violence decreases, there is the possibility of an extension. 

“And we hope very much that the withdrawal will be conducted with a principle priority placed on the security of the UN personnel,” she said.

Rice said the UNSC had found itself at a dead end while trying to find a solution to the Syrian crisis. That is why, she said, Washington will concentrate on the work with non-UNSC members.

“The US will intensify our work with countries outside the UNSC – particularly the 100+ countries supporting the Friends of Syria process,” Rice said.

Russia had initially threatened to veto the British proposal as Moscow initially supported the Pakistani draft resolution.

The 15-nation council went into emergency consultations in a bid to avoid a second Russia veto on a Syria in 24 hours and a fourth since the start of the crisis in March last year.

On Thursday Russia and China vetoed the Chapter 7 resolution drafted by Britain, which would also allow the council to authorize actions ranging from diplomatic and economic sanctions to military intervention.

He stressed that the main thing is that the resolution contains calls to both sides to end the violence.

The UN monitoring mission in Syria was deployed 90 days ago as part of international envoy Kofi Annan's peace plan to end the 16-month conflict that has killed thousands.

Comments (21)

Victor Pierre 22.07.2012 00:57

A good move from the Russian-Syrian side would to activate the Kurdish rebellion in Turkey, to provide them massive support in equipment and weapons against Turkey, to give them shelter in Syria if needed. That would put an end to Turkish involvment in the destabilization of Syria. There are no other means than to strike hard the ennemy. NATO will not stop its manoeuvers untill it is suffers harm. If the cost to pay for Turkey to support to the attack on Syria is too expensive, they will come back to a neutral position. It is not possible ti defend Syria without making NATO paying a an excessive price for its gain, specially for second rank allies of the US like Turkey. As long as Russia, China, Iran and Syria keep a conservative position - to defend their interests, they will lose assets. If they want to keep what they have, they must become more aggressive. Impossible to maintain a statu quo without creating serious political and economical trouble for the NATO countries involved in this war.

0

Undo

@duncan lucas (unregistered) 21.07.2012 13:00

duncan lucas (unregistered) wrote in #9
It really upset me that telling the TRUTH caused me to be "stopped from posting"As it "offended" the West(US)=Look at the IRAQ war all LIES.But the UK/US governments don't want you to know the TRUTH.
or maybe you just don't know the limit, and maybe some guys in RT actually have jobs and are better off then you. that just maybe the sad truth.

this comment is not for you to read since it won't make any sense to you. it's for some other people who read your comments.
did you think that the reason you write comment is because it's more comfortable to you then doing something useful? i can assure you the world isn't going to change according to how upset/mad you are, or any mode you may be in.

0

Undo

duncan lucas (unregistered) 21.07.2012 11:02

thanks for the info=Blue Eyed Muslim=I have twice emailed RT @ contact us dont think it made much difference.In times of War the "first causality" is the TRUTH.It really upset me that telling the TRUTH caused me to be "stopped from posting"As it "offended" the West(US)=Look at the IRAQ war all LIES.But the UK/US governments dont want you to know the TRUTH.

0

Undo

View all comments (21)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us