Mandate mash-up: UNSC to clash on Syrian mission

Published time: July 11, 2012 07:52
Edited time: July 11, 2012 11:52
U.N. vehicle transports senior U.N. members of the United Nations observers mission in Syria (UNSMIS) during a field visit to the town of Harsta, near Damascus, June 12, 2012 (Reuters/SANA/Handout)

Russia proposes a non-confrontational approach towards transition in Syria as the UN Security Council is to discuss the future of its mission in the country. The US is pushing for a more aggressive take on the Syrian government.

The current 90-day UN mission in Syria expires on July 21. Russia has proposed a draft resolution to extend it for three months. Under the document, it would shift focus from monitoring a non-existent truce to hammering out a transition solution for the conflict.

The draft resolution is “absolutely non-confrontational” and is in line with the decision taken on June 30 in Geneva, says Russia’s Deputy Envoy to the UN Aleksandr Pankin.

The conference of leading world and regional powers came up with a roadmap for transition in Syria, which would include forming a unity government with all the sides of the conflict. But neither Damascus nor the opposition forces were thrilled with it, while Russia and the Western countries clashed over interpretations of the document signed there.

“We suggest our partners to work with our draft even though we know that not all of them may like it. There is much talking lately, especially from our Western colleagues, that the only instrument for making Damascus adhere to agreements is sanctions, including those affecting the interests of Russia,” Pankin commented.

The United States and European Council members are pushing for a resolution under Chapter 7 of the UN Charter. It allows the council to authorize penalties ranging from economic sanctions up to military intervention. Western powers say they want to apply sanctions rather than force against Damascus.

Moscow believes such a confrontational approach would be counterproductive and would not help stop bloodshed in the country, which has been continuing for 16 months now and taken thousands of lives. Earlier Russia and China vetoed a draft resolution which would put the blame for the ongoing violence on Damascus and fail to mention the opposition’s contribution to it.

Russia also calls for better engagement with regional powers, particularly Iran and Saudi Arabia, which have stakes in the Syrian conflict. It mirrors the words of International envoy Kofi Annan, who remarked that Tehran has influence on Damascus and could play a positive role in resolving the situation. The UN envoy was speaking during his trip to Syria and Iran. He is to brief the UN Security Council on his diplomatic efforts on Wednesday.

The suggestion to draw Iran closer was met with skepticism from Washington. State Department spokesman Patrick Ventrell called Iran's role in Syria “destructive” in a reference to its support for the Syrian government against the armed opposition.

"If the Iranian regime wants to stop giving direct material support to the Syrian killing machine, then – and play a constructive role – we would welcome that. We're not at that point yet," Ventrell told reporters Monday.

The US is supporting Syrian opposition forces diplomatically and seeks to act through the “Friends of Syria” group, which does not include Russia or China.

Comments (5)

UhOh (unregistered) 11.07.2012 15:31

The United States and European Council members are pushing for a resolution under Chapter 7 of the UN Charter. It allows the council to authorize penalties ranging from economic sanctions up to military intervention. Western powers say they want to apply sanctions rather than force against Damascus.
------- -------------------- -------
There is no mistaking the trademark persistent and ever-confrontational aggression of Israel in the EU and US positions.

0

Undo

Regime change is not the role of the UNSC (unregistered) 11.07.2012 11:33

The aim of this and similar meeting at the UNSC should be about how to start the processes of reconciliation and peace rebuilding and political transformation in Syria. However, certain actors are dead set on bring about regime change in Syria and nothing else is going to work for them. These actors how no Plan B for Syria. Syria is only a flank of bigger destabilization project for them. The world cannot accept this.

+11

Undo

Saied_RF (unregistered) 11.07.2012 11:02

The only thing that U.S. and his allies want is escalating the Syrian crisis in order to serve the Zionists. Doesn't make any difference to them to do this via U.N. or other ways. For them, this organization is just a tool. The bloods of the victims in the Middle East crisis are on their hands.

+12

Undo

View all comments (5)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us