Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.

 

Breaking news

Dotcom: All Megaupload servers 'wiped out without warning in data massacre'

US should handle ambassador’s death carefully – former diplomat

Published time: September 13, 2012 02:29
Edited time: September 13, 2012 06:29
A demonstrator holds placard during a rally to condemn the killers of the U.S. Ambassador to Libya and the attack on the U.S. consulate, in Benghazi September 12, 2012 (AFP Photo / Esam Al-Fetori)
Download video (39.67 MB)
Embed

The small number of Islamic militias in Libya will use any opportunity to hurt American interests in the Arab World, John Graham, who began his diplomatic career in the American Embassy in Tripoli, told RT.

­Washington must be very careful with its rhetoric when addressing the recent attack on diplomatic mission in Benghazi, he said, in order to prevent the spread of anti-American sentiment.

Commenting on the recent killings of US Ambassador Chris Stevens and three others in Benghazi, Libya, and the outrage against the anti-Islamic, American-made film "Innocence of Muslims," Graham told RT that Washington is “simply playing into the hand of the opportunistic mullahs and perhaps the al-Qaeda operatives who would see this as a wonderful opportunity to enrage the Arab street against the United States.”  


RT: Has the anger directed towards Americans who are based there shocked you?

John Graham: No, no. There is enormous tumult in the Arab world ever since the Arab Spring, and there’s all kinds of factions and all kinds of unresolved issues in both Libya and in Egypt, as your viewers well know. So anything that happened out there – it’s the Wild West out there – no, it does not shock me. What does shock me is, quite frankly, is the fodder that some are using in the United States in terms of our current presidential campaign, using it as a domestic political issue. That does shock me.

RT: Are we talking about a select few, or is the discontent much more widespread? What is the scope that you’re talking about in Libya?

JG: Well, I think what President Obama and the Secretary of State Hilary Clinton were trying to do with their statements was not to inflate the entire Arab world, because they recognize perfectly well that most Arab nations are trying to do the right thing, to build their nations. Most Muslim people have a good deal of respect for the United States, even if they do no not agree with all of our policies. There is great incentive to tread extremely carefully, which Obama's statement did. So what we’re dealing with, I think, are Islamic opportunists. Who knows? Some say that this incident in Benghazi could have been planned even by them; I think most likely they simply took advantage of it. And there are a lot of opportunistic militias and Islamists who see this great chance in order to further their anti-American aims, but they’re a small minority.  The danger is that the American policy will not be sensitive enough in order to condemn these extremists, find and punish the perpetrators and still not enrage the entire Arab world.

RT: Did you know Christopher Stevens?

JG: I did not, I confess that I’m a bit older than his rank of diplomats, but still he was an American Foreign Service officer.  I’m outraged by the killing and my sympathy goes to the families of the fallen.

RT: This is the first time a US ambassador has been killed while in the job since 1979. What does this mean for Washington?

JG: I think all of us recognize, and certainly I did when I was in the Foreign Service, it can be a dangerous occupation. You have American Foreign Service officers in Afghanistan – when I was in Vietnam, I was a Foreign Service officer; it is a dangerous occupation. So, we regret the fact that four more names are on our remembrance wall, but it does happen. I think Obama made the right statement in saying we won’t rest until we find and punish the perpetrators.

RT: This film has sent shockwaves through the Arab world, with another anti-US protest in Tunisia Wednesday. Do you fear further unrest spreading now in the region?

JG: It could, it could. That is why the situation has to be handled so extremely carefully. And while I’m glad to see some of Obama’s opponents in the Unites States recognizing that and getting behind him in this moment of national crisis, it has to be handled extremely carefully. If it is not handled carefully, we are simply playing into the hand of the opportunistic mullahs and perhaps the al-Qaeda operatives who would see this as a wonderful opportunity to enrage the Arab street against the United States.  

RT:It depends how you may look at it, but I think one YouTube clip alone has made a bigger impact, it seems, on the region's attitude towards America than all those billions spent on the Arab Spring.

JG: Well, I would not agree with that. I think what goes on on YouTube, on Twitter and Facebook – we will not know for several years that it has enormous influence from Iran to Tunisia. And what Mr. Bacile, the California filmmaker… I mean it was outrageously irresponsible but in the United States it is his First Amendment right for this man to make such a film, so there’s little we can do to stop him.

Comments (18)

Willie Champion 26.02.2013 15:09

Many look to the film as the catalyst, however, evidence is there was very strong opposition to the U.S. orchestrated ousting of Gaddafi by the large cadre of CIA operating in the country. As ambassador Mr. Stevenss was seen as being responsible in overseeing their actions, just as there are those in Syria who were and probably still are, going after ambassador Robert Hall for his part in inciting that nations unrest. It became so hot for Mr. Hall that he actually departed the country but was ordered back. Let's be candid, Iran, Ecuador, Chile, Ecuador, Brazil, El Salvador and Bolivia its normal procedure.

0

Undo

Islammorons (unregistered) 16.09.2012 12:34

If it's not this video they are killing people over,it's something else!How come it's alright for them to kill Christians and Jews?????and have sex with 11 year old children.??Any religion that practices touching little kids should be dealt with swiftly!!!Prophet Mohammad was nothing but a pedophile.And Islam is full of uneducated poor people who are kept that way for a reason+sheep!The only thing that you'r fake religion is good for, is the leaders of you'r religion .Come to my neiborhood and try some of that mental rage ,there would be a bunch of radical Cockroaches lying dead on the ground!

0

Undo

Count Cash 13.09.2012 17:29

Bianca, wise words, of course really there is no absolute free speech (to say anything, anywhere, in any tone), even in the US. It has limitations, be it in types of speech or by proximity restrictions. But there are two problems, the first is a US one, the second is a religious cultural one. The US problem is that it has distorted and manipulated the concept of free speech as a geopolitical weapon, a tool to demand more and more, to drive destabilisation, drive strife, by representing not as it truly is in the US, which is free speech restricted by laws to be functional, but rather a concept of unfettered absolute free speech without any limits which is dysfunctional. Indeed the US has been so successful at this portrayal of absolute free speech, that many US citizens themselves really believe they have absolute free speech, when quite rightly they don’t, whilst others exploit this ignorance politically as with this video. The second problem is that many religious followers in other regions, within their cultural context are not orientated towards accepting criticism or verbal attack in any form whatsoever. It’s a red line. In time maybe they would evolve to accept criticism, who knows, it is a choice for them, but at present some do not, and any attack, especially provocative therefore offends and worse can be exploited by groups within their society for geopolitical reasons also. So with this set up, global interactions, global approaches can do nothing else but cause strife, cause wars, and those wars will get nasty and brutal, when one is following the religion of absolute free speech (and yes it is a religion of faith) in a crusade (with ulterior motives) against those following their other religions. The only answer to this as always is tolerance, balance and understanding, however both sides are being prepped for conflict. To get out of this one requires honesty from the US as to what free speech is, and it isn’t deliberate hate filled provocation.

0

Undo

View all comments (18)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us