Any engineer will explain in minute detail why there is no conspiracy. I won't waste time getting into detail but the truth is intense concetrated heat from jet feul brought those buildings down. A jumbo jet travelling at almost 500 mph slamming into the Pentagon caused the penetration and disineigration of bodies and materials. Take a crash course in structural engineering or weapons design and these conspiracy theories will all fall away very quickly. Also, watch this or any other documentary on any subject you choose. Remove from that particular story anything that is theory and not proven fact. Review the evidence in front of you and make a rational decision based on fact. Do not allow emotion to make decisions of such magnitude for you. The people who hijacked those planes did. By the way, yes, I am an engineer.

As far as I have been able to "decode" 9/11, my information is the same as yours. Due to the extreme measures to impose "political correctness" here, I commend you for publishing the series of articles about 9/11. There are three mysteries that remain to be uncovered. One is the so-called aircraft crash in Pennsylvania. Flight No. 93 was later discovered parked intact outside a hangar at O'Hare International Airport in Chicago by a mechanic on his rounds. The second is the cruise missle that was used at the Pentagon. There is a video of that, but it was seized and never shown to anybody. The last big mystery is the ultimate whereabouts of the aircrafts in the vicinity of the Trade Towers. Those videos were planned in advance and the so-called shock value is still very much overrated by a lot of people. I am left to believe that the missing aircraft were flown out to sea and were ditched in deep water so that there is nothing to be found on the continental shelf.

Peter Carminati is not the sharpest tool in the shed! Flight No. 93 is a route assigned to a particular airline...not the aircraft. Each aircraft is serialized and are all major components installed within that particular a/c for tracking. Flight No. 93 would have still existed (the route did not change) but the a/c did. What is you source (person) for the cruise missile theory? Looked like planes to me. I am a Naval Aviator and have lost many friends in aviation accidents. My squadron lost a plane and a crew of two within the vicinity of the naval air station flying low 800' and slow180kts. The biggest part of the plane recovered measured 3 7/8" x 8 1/4". The largest body part recovered was a patch of skin about 2" x 4" So, where did the planes go when the hit their targets doing approx 500kts...dust and very very small debris. Imagine the human bodies being made of soft tissue and bones...dust and very small fragments of bone. For the record I am a civil engineer and you did not voice an opinion about the collapse of the Trade Towers as to why they fell straight down rather than falling over. Easy, they were structurally designed to fall straight down Engineers know that a building will not remain standing for ever thus they will have to be brought down. In a place like NY where tall buildings surround each other, modern buildings have to be designed not to topple over and damage other buildings. This is not theory but facts!

i'am currently studying for my exams in aircash investigations. Having spent months researching the 4 alledged aircraft involved in 911 i have found no evidence to show that the claimed aircraft involved actually where. In my opinion the flight 93 impact site contained no wreckage proven to belong to a civilian aircraft. The pentagon site was also not able to provide any wreckage confirmed as belonging to a 757 aircraft. All the photo and video evidence of the 2 planes hitting the twin towers, when put together do not show the aircraft identity numbers of either plane, and would also indicate the planes where being flown by remote control and did not contain any passengers. If anybody knows the true aircraft identity numbers or the whereabouts of any of the confirmed wreckage please let me know.

I was present at the towers on 9/11 and I can promise you that not only were the planes real but there were people on them. To suggest any differently is not only vile but disrespectful to so many that died that day.

How does Mary know that there were people on the WTC Twin Towers planes, planes with no windows. More than 1000 bodies were not recovered due to explosive demolitions pulverising those people, if there were people on the planes into micro and nano particles. Where is your proof, Mary? We all, millions of us wish to know how you are privy to this information... Please let us know how you knew that there were actual people on the planes? Did you see the people? If you did not see the actual people, then your statement is baseless and even false and highly misleading to people who believe everything they read.

The first estimates on 9/11 were that 15,000 had died. That had to be adjusted down to 3,000 due to the fact that the buildings were nearly empty (just as so, per National Geograpic Society's DVD "Shock and Awe" states that most buildings targeted in Baghdad not only were unoccupied, but desks, file cabnets, etc. were removed). Shock and Awe was a big publicity stunt bringing down empty buildings. The World Trade Center was a financial failure, and I read that billions were paid in insurance. http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/content.php?TOCPJ/2009/00000002/00000001/7TOCPJ.SGM web site (hit download) presents substantial evidence of the state-of-art nano technology thermite explosives used to implode the buildings. The technology to remotely control large aircraft initially was developed by Northrop Corp. in the late 1970's at China Lake, CA, and later at MacDonnell Douglas, CA for the MD-11 (DC-10 with all of the safety systems removed) to facilitate fly by wire (electric wire), which enables systems to take over control of aircraft from the ground (to remove control from hijackers). The so called hijackers did not fly straight into WTC buildings 1 and 2, last minute aerobatics (beyond the ability of Piper Cub civil aviation beginning pilots) swerved the aircraft into specific floors, center in the building face with the wings angled such that floors above and below sliced open the wings (immediate fuel release for drama) which required Quartz Altimeters (made by Airresearch in Torrance, CA, an expensive accessory for aircraft that take off and land in fog requently). President Obama stated this past week that Osama Bin Laden had taken credit for 9/11 (as did dozens of others with animosity for the United States), and with law and community activist experience, he would not understand engineering and implosion implications of 9/11 video footage. This was a big operation that took the cooperation of many people to pull off. The objective, immediate passage of the Patriot Act (no copies for anyone to read in Congress) constituited a bloodless coup against the Constituition of the United States, a drastic reduction of freedom for American citizens, and a transfer of trillions of dollars to obscure multinational bankers and wealthy individuals (Bilderburgers). Left wing media are well practiced in debunking "conspiracy theory" (implosion of tall buildings is an art, not a theory). I was in manufacturing engineering on the B-2, design engineering on the T-45, quality engineering on the MD-11, MD-80, MD-90.

Without any doubt, per scientific and irrefutable evidence, the 911 was an inside job, a controlled demolition.

If you're an engineer then you have the smarts to know why all the security camera tapes in the vicinity of the Pentagon were immediately confiscated by the government. Share it with us please.

Someone please explain how hundreds, if not thousands of pounds of explosives could be installed in the two WTC buildings without anyone noticing? Just take a look at any of the buildings that are demolished by using explosives and one can see all of the work that goes into such an operation. There would be huge bundles of wires, holes drilled for the charges, and steel beam supports that would have to be cut. Nonsense.

If you are an engineer, Alan, perhaps you could answer a few simple questions for me: By what law of physics could the top sixth of a steel frame skyscraper simultaneously disintegrate AND pass at free-fall rate, symmetrically, through the undamaged lower five-sixths of the same building, without encountering any resistance? And what happened to all the 100+ concrete floors that supposedly pancaked? Why were they pulverized into dust? Finally, by the First Law of Thermodynamics, how could the energy input of an airliner impact+jet fuel fireball+office fires on 4-5 floors+gravity from the upper stories--after an hour of burning, turning mostly to smoke (the sign of an oxygen-starved fire), generate enough energy for a catastrophic free-fall collapse, and pulverization into dust, of the buildings? The energy output reflected in such an event has been calculated at approximately 10 times the (visible) energy input of the impact, fires, and gravity. Which means that the collateral energy could only have come from controlled demolition charges, clearly visible as explosive "spliffs" all the way down... Explain that, Mr. Engineer.

Several weeks after the 9/11/2001 event, one of my clients (I am a massage therapist) told me her husband had been on a temporary work assignment in the twin towers that ended the week prior to 9/11. She then became very serious as she told me that upon his return home from that assignment, he told her that there had been practice evacuations of the towers happening just one week prior to the attack. Strange ... and curious.

Alan, you have stated that "any engineer" can disprove the gov. conspiracy?? How about these engineers: http://www.ae911truth.org/ Check the pic at the right...those little sticks you see are steel beams weighing 4 to 10 tons each being hurled LATERALLY up to 500ft. You don't need a crash course in any subject to know that gravity can NOT do that my friend. As for the Pentagon...you have to be kidding. A jet fuel fire, mostly KEROSENE, disintegrated the bodies, the luggage, the seats as well as two 6 ton engines made of steal and titanium?? Yeah, that's what our corrupt leaders want us to believe. They also want us to believe that the cameras lining the roof of the Pentagon, the most well protected building IN THE WORLD, did not capture any clear images of what caused the explosion. Nor did the 80+ videos confiscated by the FBI from surrounding businesses, the videos they refuse to release to the public. They also want us to believe that, due to so much "confusion", our military was unable to respond over a period of nearly two hours when in fact, air force interceptions of planes off course or out of communication is a routine act and can be executed within minutes. Its clear you have made your conclusion without reviewing the available evidence as you have suggested. Along with the above website, I would suggest the movie "Press for Truth" which you can watch online (google) as well as the book "911 Contradictions" by D. Griffin. Peace.

I wanted to thank to the RUSSIA for giving the fully, heart-filled respect for the 9/11 Victims and Perished Fellows. And yes, I am truly shame at our government for taking all the video away and not letting us all knowing what going on. They are in big trouble right now. As you know the United States passed a law called Freedom of Information ACT. Therefore, the FBI and any departments who are involved in the 9/11 situations, are now in the hot water. How can we cool the water? They, the United States Government's Bush Administration, have to release the information ASAP! EVERYTHING, no missing information!

Without commenting on the validity of the conspiracy theory, this "new" film sounds like a rehash of "Loose Change," which has been in circulation for several years.

June 14, 2009, 04:50, Petr Buben wrote > Without any doubt, per scientific and irrefutable evidence, the 911 was an inside job, a controlled demolition. The government said they had to pull the buildings and knock them down with explosives. But who would go into a burning building and set explosives. obviously the explosives were already set when the planes hit the buildings because the y were knocked down only 45 minutes after the planes hit. noone could get explosives and set them in that time. it is as ifthe government knew that the planes were going to hit those specific buildings. Weird?

April 30, 2009, 16:42, Alan wrote > Any engineer will explain in minute detail why there is no conspiracy. I won't waste time getting into detail but the truth is intense concetrated heat from jet feul brought those buildings down. A jumbo jet travelling at almost 500 mph slamming into the Pentagon caused the penetration and disineigration of bodies and materials. Take a crash course in structural engineering or weapons design and these conspiracy theories will all fall away very quickly. Also, watch this or any other documentary on any subject you choose. Remove from that particular story anything that is theory and not proven fact. Review the evidence in front of you and make a rational decision based on fact. Do not allow emotion to make decisions of such magnitude for you. The people who hijacked those planes did. By the way, yes, I am an engineer.

Alan's statement is just so full of pathetic misdirection. It is the same message from wayne earlier. What a load of meaningless garbage. The truth is in the details you are avoiding. You would be a disgrace to any engineering profession. Answer me this bud: WHY hasn't ANY engineer EVER stood up in court under oath to make your arguments?? "thousands and thousands of experts" WHERE are they?? This is the same drumbeat the goverment wants to hypnotize the public with, and the public is not really that stupid. The use of drone aircraft in Afghanistan is teaching the public new things and the "aircraft did it" stupidity will not hold up for long.

I would like to know how Mary can make this kind of statement. Is she one of the seven hundred survivors?? If she was in one of the buildings, how did she see the aircraft?? If she was on the ground, how did she see inside the windows?? She says she was there is just not reason enough for me. How can you be disrepectful of anybody who was not actually on the aircraft?? These families were paid a great deal of insurance money not to ask questions. If you look at the passenger manifests on each aircraft, and even the workers in the buildings, you will find that the people were on the aircraft sponsored or employed by the same twelve companies that have ruled the world since the organized crime days. At some point someone will discover these missing people under the city of Dubai working to lead the world business as untraceable workers.