Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.

 

​It’s time for a final break with ‘free trade’

Mark Bergfeld is a writer and activist based in Cologne, Germany and London, UK. He tweets @mdbergfeld

Published time: June 23, 2014 15:26
European Union chief negotiator Ignacio Garcia Bercero (R) and US chief negotiator Dan Mullaney give a joint press conference following the fourth round of negotiations of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) held at the EU Commission headquarters in Brussels, on March 14, 2014 (AFP Photo)

The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) might just push people on both sides of the Atlantic over the edge.

The ideology of “free trade” reminds me of my ex-girlfriend telling me not to make promises I cannot keep. From Adam Smith to Bill Clinton, elites have contended that “free trade” means less war and more jobs. To be more precise, “free trade” is freedom. In its most recent history, its promise of growth and prosperity has remained unfulfilled, however.

Economic growth remains sluggish despite trade barriers being at an all-time low. While I continued to make promises, world leaders continue trying to stretch the boundaries of the possible once again.

The latest promise of free trade comes in form of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), a free trade zone stretching from the Baltic Sea to the Hawaiian Islands. Just as my girlfriend grew discontented with my promises and broke up with me, peoples across the globe have grown outright hostile to free trade. TTIP might just push people on both sides of the Atlantic over the edge.

In the beginning were the Zapatistas

This year marks the 20th anniversary of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) which came into effect on January 1, 1994. On that day a group of indigenous peoples from Chiapas, Mexico or simply referred to as the “Zapatistasassembled under the banner of the EZLN to march on the capital. With balaclavas pulled over their faces and on horseback their protest was primarily symbolic yet they inspired a new cycle of global protest against the unjust trade policies come to known as “globalization” and “free trade.

Zapatistas followers take part in the funeral of the teacher and Zapatista leader Jose Luis Solis Lopez in La Realidad, Chiapas State, Mexico (AFP Photo)

At the time, the Zapatistas’ ideas appeared outlandish. A free trade zone stretching from the Mexican-Guatemalan border to the Canadian North Pole would bring growth, prosperity and jobs for all. Twenty years later, it is safe to say that history has proven the Zapatistas right. Poverty is rampant in Mexico. More than 20 million Mexicans live in “food poverty”, and 2 million farmers have been forced to leave their land. As a consequence nearly half a million Mexicans take the deadly risk to migrate into the USA every year. North of the border an estimated 700,000 jobs have been lost in the US.

Five years later, the Zapatistas were no longer the only ones campaigning against “free trade”. On November 30, 1999, a powerful coalition of trade unionists and environmental activists – Teamsters and Turtles – brought inner-city Seattle to a standstill so to shut down the World Trade Organization (WTO) negotiations. In the years to follow, G20 states such as Brazil and negotiators from poorer nations of the Global South joined in protest. No longer was “free trade” seen as a benevolent force by the majority of the world’s population. It is no surprise then that the Doha Round of the WTO has been in deadlock. Though states have successfully circumvented this impasse. Instead of pursuing multilateral trade agreements, states and free trading blocs such as the European Union (EU), states have moved toward bilateral trade agreements. For example, the EU has ratified 18 bilateral free trade agreements since 2001.

A high price to pay

For multinationals and bureaucratic elites on both sides of the Atlantic, TTIP appears to be a remedy against their prolonged economic woes. Since the collapse of Lehman Brothers in 2008, the Unites States’ average 2 percent in annual economic growth are leaving it behind the BRICS. It appears that the housing bubble, once the nation’s engine of growth, has burst once and for all. Today, prices remain 15 percent below their peak value. US capital is forced to find new areas of growth and expansion. In the EU, member countries’ productivity rates cannot catch up with those of its economic powerhouse Germany, hence leading to unsustainable trade imbalances within the eurozone. In countries like Spain and Greece, youth unemployment amounts to more than 55 percent.

At first sight, TTIP would boost exports from 14 US industrial sectors. Yet, at a closer look these figures mean little given the high levels of export/import between the US and EU. According to the Centre for Economic Policy Research which has the most optimistic calculations the establishment of this ‘free zone’ will lead to a 0.5 percent increase in growth in the EU and 0.4 percent in the US respectively – when fully implemented by 2027. This is an awfully high price to pay for such a miserable outcome. It is a sick joke! While previous ‘free trade’ deals promised growth, jobs and prosperity, TTIP’s only aim is to remain globally competitive against rising economic powers such as China, India and Brazil.

According to WTO estimates, customs duties average 3.5 percent in the US, and 5.2 percent in the EU. To introduce ‘free trade’ tackles the wrong problem. Ulrike Herrman argues that the far bigger problem is currency speculation which raises prices of imports/exports: “Up to USD 5.3 trillion are in use every day around the world to speculate on currencies. By contrast, the entire world trade was only USD 18.4 trillion in 2012 – that is, in a year. Daily currency speculation has long since been disconnected from trade flows.”

In light of this, what is TTIP really about? Supposedly, it is about ‘harmonization’ so that German or US car manufacturers no longer will need to produce both a European and American model. Supposedly, it is about moving toward a new era of innovation in manufacturing. In reality, it is about a further redistribution of wealth in the interest of multinationals, finance capital and other capital fractions, popularly referred to as the one percent.

Job seekers arrive at the National Career Fairs' San Francisco South Career Fair (AFP Photo)

The poverty of ‘free trade’

The fact that TTIP supporters on both sides of the Atlantic no longer make any grand claims, reveals that this deal is more about keeping the ideology of ‘free trade’ alive than creating jobs, growth and prosperity. The worries that the crisis would lead states to rediscover ‘protectionism’ has been unfounded. The daily amount of products and services – worth roughly 1.8 billion euros – will continue to be exchanged between the US and Europe regardless whether TTIP is enacted or not.

And it seems that opponents are on a good path of blocking TTIP’s enactment despite the level of secrecy surrounding it. So far, more than 700,000 citizens across the two continents have signed the petition against the plan. At the beginning of the fifth round of negotiations, protesters assembled in Bruxelles. Now civil society organizations, trade unions, environmental and religious groups are organizing toward a day of action on July 12.

With the Doha Round of the WTO in deadlock, the Anti-Counterfeiting and Copyright Agreement (ACTA) on ice, the odds are stacked against TTIP. Unfortunately, opponents in the EU concentrate on the import of chlorine chicken from the US. This misses the point that trade negotiators on both sides have made exemptions in the past and are likely to do so in the future. Only if opponents are willing to break-up with these ‘free trade’ deals once and for all can TTIP be defeated. And if I have ever learnt anything from my ex-girlfriend: The more promises broken, the easier the break-up.

Comments (4)

 

JerryBear 28.07.2014 18:22

[quote name='Durandus von Meissen' time='20.07.2014 01:46'][/quote]

Well written sir.

Or, as Frédéric Bastiat, the French classical political economist said :-

"Wh en plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men living together in society, they create for themselves in the course of time, a legal system that authorises it, and a moral code that glorifies it.

Succinc t huh ?

 

Durandus von Meissen 20.07.2014 01:46

The Idolatry of Wealth is an insatiable Beast, while historical evidence admits that those who benefit from its accumulation are an extreme minority, due to the collusion of Power and Wealth to concentrate in the smallest circle of conspirators. This has ever been true.

Power is a direct result of Wealth, the greater the concentration of the latter, the greater the former's anarchy, bravado and treachery. There is nothing which Power will not dare that Wealth cannot pay for, the one enabling the other in a vicious cycle of reinforcement. Power provides "plausible deniability" for the crimes of Wealth, War withal.

 

Fred Sleepwalker 26.06.2014 08:14

We have to fight all those trade agreements even more so if they are secretly negotiated! TISA aims to make it possible to sue countries if they would try to implement laws to protect theyr citizens against poisonous food etc. which would amongst other bad things open the doors for GM food, Monsanto will be happy.

Also if TISA gets real then you should be trying to avoid that your country is selling state owned water distribution, electricity, gas, oil etc to a corporation because with TISA this can not be taken back once they have risen the prices 400 % including a worse service!

Do nt give up the fight!!

View all comments (4)
Add comment

Authorization required for adding comments

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

OK

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

X

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us

Follow us