Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.

 

'Street thuggery became major tool of regime change in Ukraine’

Published time: January 21, 2014 14:29

Protesters clash with police in central Kiev on January 20, 2014. (AFP Photo)

Download video (74.55 MB)

We are dealing with a clear attempt to undermine the constitutional order of Ukraine through use of street violence and mob rule as a means of regime change, Srdja Trifkovic, foreign affairs editor at Chronicles magazine, told RT.

Tensions remained high in Kiev after on January 18-19 a peaceful demonstration turned into violent clashes with the police. The unrest was acknowledged to be unleashed by the most aggressive group of protesters – Ukrainian nationalists.

Libor Roucek, member of the European Parliament, says that the EU strongly condemns the violence but does express support for peaceful demonstrations in Ukraine.

We don’t support the violence, but we do support not only in Ukraine, not only in Europe – everywhere in the world – peaceful expression of human rights,” he told RT. “Today [on Monday] there was a meeting of ministers of foreign affairs, saying that we don’t support the violence,” he added.

On the contrary, foreign affairs editor at Chronicles magazine, Srdja Trifkovic, says that “now we are dealing with significant group of highly committed people who are hell-bent on regime change through street thuggery,” criticizing the EU for double standards.

In fact, what we are dealing with is a clear attempt to undermine the constitutional order of a major European state and it is truly shocking for European parliamentarians to say they are still supportive of a process that obviously wants to use street violence and mob rule as a means of regime change,” Trifkovic told RT.

Trifkovic also criticizes the EU position concerning the legitimacy of Yanukovich’s power, saying that if the EU claims that Yanukovich has lost legitimacy, “what’s about Silvio Berlusconi who was under criminal investigation for the best part of 10 years that he was in power as Italy’s prime minister.”

Ukrainian opposition activists stand by burnt police vehicles after clashes with police in central Kiev on January 21, 2014. (AFP Photo)

Though Roucek agreed that there were presidential elections in Ukraine three years ago, and these elections were recognized as free and fair, saying that if there has to be a change of government, it has to be done through the elections. He claimed that “it’s up to the Ukrainian people to decide what do they want: association agreement or whether they want closer relations with Russia.

President Yanukovich had the mandate to negotiate the deeper and comprehensive trade agreement; at the last moment under Russian [pressure] he withdrew from it, and that’s the reaction of the [Ukrainian] people,” he said, adding his opinion that the only possible solution for the Ukrainian crisis lies through dialogue.

The dialogue is needed in Rada, in Parliament, and especially [it] is needed between the government and the opposition, the representatives of the opposition who are present in Parliament. And through dialogue everything has to be discussed, not through violence,” Roucek told RT.

While Roucek blames Russia for pressurizing Ukraine to refuse the association agreement with the EU, Trifkovic argues that Yanukovich saved his country form “a horrible deal”.

“We are looking at a clear-cut situation where Yanukovich was perfectly within his rights to say “no” to a horrible deal, which, had it gone ahead, would have cost Ukraine tens of billions of euros that it could have not afforded, when Russia came in with a 15 billion rescue package; and it’s simply that Europe wanted to have free access to the Ukrainian market for nothing. It was geopolitical all along,” Trifkovic told RT.

Srdja Trifkovic assumed that in the end “most Ukrainians will realize which side their bread is buttered and that the deal with Russia was connected not only with economics but with long-term traditional, spiritual and cultural links.

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.

Comments (10)

 

Speedy Steve 30.01.2014 02:27

Why do I get the sneaking suspicion that the EU wants nothing more than a good old-fashioned KKK cross-burning on Russia's front lawn as the Olympics approach?

 

rubiezred 22.01.2014 01:52

[quote name='Tom M' time='21.01.2014 17:12 RT's paid to push Kremlin propganda. I very rarely stop by to see how RT's twisting things. It's good comic relief. When has RT ever said anything good about the west?. [/quote]

LO L! I don't see Russia drone-bombing and FSB spying on a worldwide criminal scale, as recognized by the Western NGO Human Rights Watch for the NSA? I don't see Afghanis and Pakistanis burning Russian flags in the streets as they do US flags. Surely Corporate News Network (CNN) would report THAT event with glee! You are too funny!

 

Nussiminen 21.01.2014 19:36

For all his lack of resolve, the legitimacy of Yanukovich is indisputable, especially compared to the EU. The latter's "legitimacy&quo t; today can be gauged today not only by the rampant corruption, greed, and imminent bankruptcy of the EU but quite touchingly by the animals it sponsors abroad, most notably in Ukraine and Syria.

Fina l call for Maidan Eurorabble: Off you go and clean toilets in some country of your liking, or else...

View all comments (10)
Add comment

Authorization required for adding comments

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

OK

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

X

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us