Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.

 

​Western non-intervention policy that let Nazi Germany rise lives to this day

John Wight is a writer and commentator specializing in geopolitics, UK domestic politics, culture and sport.

Published time: April 17, 2014 12:17
Activists of the Right Sector movement and their supporters gather outside the parliament building to demand the immediate resignation of Internal Affairs Minister Arsen Avakov, in Kiev March 27, 2014 (Reuters / Vasily Fedosenko)

When it comes to resisting fascism, the record of the West has been a shameful one in the past, and given the events in Ukraine you can’t ignore this fact.

With the anniversary of the Battle of Berlin approaching on April 21, which signaled the final defeat of the Nazis at the close of the Second World War in 1945, it is worth recalling an event which took place seven years earlier, without which the Second World War would likely never have taken place – or at least certainly not to the cataclysmic extent that it did.

While it may be a hard truth for Western ideologues to grapple with today, Hitler’s expansionist aims and objectives could never have prospered without the aid of Western powers, which up to 1939 rather than resist the fascist menace in Europe – at the point when it could have been quashed - did everything in their power to appease it, providing Hitler and the Nazis with the impetus to build the military apparatus required to unleash total war and catapult Europe into an abyss of carnage and destruction.

The tragic lessons

This appeasement began with the non-intervention policy of the Western powers during the Spanish Civil War in the mid-1930s. A democratically elected government had come under military attack by General Franco and the nationalist military forces under his command, determined to crush any last scintilla of democracy in the country on the way to its fascist overthrow. Hitler and Mussolini both threw their military resources behind Franco, identifying Spain as an opportunity to test both the military hardware and tactics they had been formulating to advance their own strategic objectives, but also the resolve of the West when it came to resisting them.

The policy of non-intervention followed by Britain and France was a green light to Franco and his German and Italian allies to press ahead with their campaign to crush democracy in Spain, which it eventually did despite the aid provided by the Soviet Union and the heroic efforts of the Spanish people to save the Republic.

Lessons that should have been learned from the Spanish debacle were not, leaving any objective historian to conclude that the West was not only guilty of the crime of appeasing fascism but actively colluded with it. How else are we to make sense of the Munich Agreement of September 1938, which handed Hitler the keys to Czechoslovakia and led inexorably to the fascist dictator’s march into Poland, precipitating the Second World War and everything which followed?

Reuters / Valentyn Ogirenko

The agreement involved Germany, Italy, France and Britain ratifying Hitler’s annexation of the German-speaking region of Czechoslovakia, the Sudetenland, without the prior agreement or even consultation with the Government of Czechoslovakia. Moreover, the Soviet Union and France had in place a mutual military assistance treaty with Czechoslovakia, which the Soviets were eager to uphold by offering to send troops to defend Czechoslovakia’s territorial integrity and sovereignty.

The offer was ignored by the Western powers, while Poland refused to allow transit rights for Soviet troops to pass through Polish territory in order to defend Czechoslovakia, thus sealing its fate. Worse than refusing to allow Soviet troops permission to transit through its territory to defend Czechoslovakia, the then Polish government took the opportunity provided by Hitler’s annexation of the country to seize the Czechoslovakian border town of Tesin for itself.

The historical similarities

The point is that the record of the West when it comes to resisting fascism has been a shameful one in the past. Sadly, it is a record that continues today with the role of the US and EU in lending legitimacy to the violent overthrow of the democratically elected government of Ukraine, and its replacement by a so-called interim government involving the participation of neo Nazis and fascists.

Yet to judge from the way this ongoing crisis is being covered in the Western media, you would think it was the Russian government that was giving succor to fascism and anti-democratic coups in the country. The administration that is currently wielding power in Kiev has no legitimacy, and it inspires no respect from those who have risen up against it in eastern Ukraine. Indeed to ascribe legitimacy to the collection of neo Nazis and ultra-nationalists in Kiev that describes itself as an interim government is, in the words of the French novelist Victor Hugo, to “confound the brilliance of the firmament with the star-shaped footprints of a duck in the mud.”

With tensions rising in the eastern half of Ukraine, the only chance of averting civil and military conflict would now appear to lie with the talks in Geneva between the four powers. In this regard, it is impossible at this point to foresee how any peaceful solution to the crisis can avoid the implementation of a political framework that will satisfy the justifiable desire of people in the East of the country for some sort of regional autonomy, which restores their democratic rights and guarantees protection from an administration in Kiev that has no democratic mandate or legitimacy.

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.

Comments (4)

 

Maria Łaś 21.05.2014 21:27

The good old daddy Stalin wanted to save Czechoslovakia and we didn't allow his troops to march through Poland.... Hahaha, good joke. In the late 30's Poland had two choices: an alliance with Germany agains the USSR or the alliance with the USSR against Germany. Both were going to end the same way for us. BTW: Seizing Tesin was an awfull mistake and crime. Nostra culpa. One of most shamefull moments in our history.

 

Martin Voigt 02.05.2014 04:01

Your over- and undertone is wrong and injust to my people and therefore at the end of the day wrong to everybody on all planes. Your undertone is a facist one not only towards my country and yet again falsifying history - his stories. The factual warmonger was Churchill incl. his zionist mandarins then and Dynastie today. Study the facts and keep them in context, please. Getting yourself righthous about "Nazi-Germany&q uot; should mirror you British-Bastardry, French-Bludgery respectively Stalinism and not to mention the one and only Mao Tse Tung. It is ugly all over and you seem to be at home (in one room). Sorry.

 

Catmandu 18.04.2014 12:04

This US policy of surreptitious intervention in other sovereign states whatever their politics is nothing new, they were funding German fascism to the tune of $500 million dollars in 1940, and I have no doubt that they would have carried on if it were not for the attack on Pearl harbour

View all comments (4)
Add comment

Authorization required for adding comments

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

OK

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

X

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us

Follow us