Belarus’ new geopolitical accents
Published: 20 October, 2010, 17:25
Edited: 21 October, 2010, 19:14
RIA Novosti / Sergey Guneev
TAGS: Conflict, Russia, Politics, Belarus
The Belarusian leader defines geopolitical priorities as another presidential candidate speaks in favor of closer ties with the EU and NATO and against Russian as a state language.
Belarusian President Aleksandr Lukashenko has explained the need to change the country’s national security concept as “contemporary global challenges and threats.”
Complicated global processes force the country “to make new accents,” to develop new national security mechanisms, Lukashenko said, speaking at a meeting of the Belarusian National Security Council on Tuesday.
The moves in this sphere should become “pre-emptive” and adjusted to new realities, the president said. Security problems in the political area have also become more acute, he said, according to Interfax news agency.
Lukashenko mentioned the threat of extremism and terrorism, and highlighted humanitarian and information threats. “Modern methods of influencing public minds sometimes cause a more disastrous effect than the use of conventional arms,” the agency quoted him as saying.
The current approach to ensure the country’s security cannot remain unchanged, Lukashenko said. However, he stressed that Minsk started to develop the new security concept last December and “there has not been and cannot be any direct link to the current political situation.”
Moscow and Minsk are at odds on some political and economic problems. President Dmitry Medvedev has recently accused his Belarusian counterpart of using anti-Russian rhetoric during the presidential campaign. Lukashenko, in turn, has said the Russian leadership has organized an information campaign against him in the media.
Analysts are wondering how the relations between the two countries may change soon, with many observers predicting that Lukashenko will retain his post after the presidential election, which is due in December.
Russian officials have made it clear that Moscow could try to establish closer contacts with the leaders of the Belarusian opposition. However, presidential candidates in Belarus have different views on the future of the relations between the two countries.
Minsk should quit the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) and the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) in the future, Grigory Kostusev told Interfax. The candidate nominated by the opposition Belarusian People’s Front believes his country should “stay friends with Russia.” At the same time, Moscow should “pay the rent for its military bases deployed on Belarusian territory,” he stressed.
He noted that Belarus’ products are frequently unsuitable to any other markets except Russia’s, but insisted that the two countries should have treaties regulating all aspects of their relations.
These treaties, including those concerning oil and gas transit, could help to avoid “new rows with Russia,” Kostusev said. He also spoke in favor of closer relations with the European Union and NATO, adding that Belarus has not benefited from the participation in the CIS, the CSTO and the Russia-Belarus Union State.
If elected, Kostusev would return old state symbols and Belarusian as the single state language. According to him, more than 50 per cent of Belarusian citizens are “morally ready to switch” to it.
As the date of the elections in Belarus is nearing, more statements and allegations regarding Belarus’ geopolitical positions have started to emerge, not necessarily from Russia.
According to allegations in some Israeli media, Moscow has developed a scenario to overthrow the Belarusian leader, Regnum news agency said. The goal is to force Belarus to join Russia, it added.
These speculations “ideally fit the information aspect of the Belarusian leader’s presidential campaign,” the agency said. This stems from the assertion that “Russia presents the main threat to Belarus’ sovereignty,” Regnum added.
On Wednesday, Lukashenko is meeting with Lithuanian President Dalia Grybauskaite in Minsk. “Analysts believe that the arrival of the head of a European state on the eve of the presidential elections means making advances to Lukashenko, even if not unconditional,” Nezavisimaya Gazeta daily said.
The Belarusian president is compensating for failures in relations with Russia “by foreign policy successes in other directions,” the paper noted. “The agreements recently signed with Venezuela really benefit Belarus,” it added.
“These successes do not make Belarusian opposition politicians happy,” the daily said, adding that some of them consider Grybauskaite’s visit untimely. “But Europe has its own logic,” it noted.
Sergey Borisov, RT
19.10.2010, 18:32
6 comments
ROAR: Russia insists on joint agenda with NATOAs Russia and NATO prepare for the next summit, Moscow must not be simply informed of decisions taken by the alliance’s member states, politicians and analysts stress. |
20.10.2010, 17:58
5 comments
50 years of sanctions: time for a Cuban healingDespite 50 years of US blockade, Cuba has somehow survived as one of the few remaining communist states. So is it worth keeping? RT looks at the pros and cons of the sanctions. |
Enrique, There is no 'danger' in Belarus that Russian language will be wiped out any time soon. It will probably exist along side of Belarusian as many people prefer to communicate in Russian. During the Soviet time it was awfully 'uncool' to speak even with a Belarusian accent, the eloquence of your speech in Russian determined your social and intellectual status in society, and nobody wanted to be branded as "kolkhoznik" (collective farmer labourer or rural). The reason why more and more Belarusians are in favour of their own language now is rather tragic: Kuropaty ( Belarusian equivalent of Katyn). Google if you wish to know more. Bianca, A few weeks ago I watched the Lukashenko's interview for one of the American channels. When asked "What is your best wish for the people of your country?" he replied simply and without hesitation: " I want them to smile, always". But there are plenty of those in Belarus who would rather smile at the money symbols together with the Russian oligarch-esque crowd. Some are 'fighting' for democratic values, some for their own. If Lukashenko increases decibels in his " We don't want to look at the West and East and wait for their crumbles", the opposition may be dispersed or assimilated into the government.
The best reference to know what is the use of a language are commercial adds. If private commercials (TV, newspapers) in Belarus are done in Russian that says everything... The private economy, which interest are consumers tell us the reality. If companies think that to sell something they have to use commercials in Russian in Belarus (instead than using commercials in belorussian) that answers us what is in the minds of the people.












Belarusian export to Russia is nearly half of all national export, why to create the language barriers? Private sector isn't big enough to advertise globally - all the main national assets are still not for privatisation despite great interest from potential new ownerships, particularly from Russia.