In terms of modern accounting the asset management is interpreted as the set of three capitals: tangible (objects, land, plants…), intangible (trademarks, patents…) and human or political. The first two were broadly perceptive, but the history teaches that Russia was unaware of the third one, political capital, which amount to 65% of the total national asset. (The fact is far from obvious!) Tolstoy elaborated the third one in “Resurrection”. He explained the problems of transition of the ownership into more effective regional management. With the Church he went on as the opposing vector and got excommunicated. Both activities were Russian constitutional topics. Choosing and speculating among the both – Russia failed to determine and dropped herself into painful revolution. “Being smart” today we can say – political capital was at that time not recognized. Involvement of RSPP into governmental “controller unit” is tackling the missing vector of devastated Russian sense for ownership. This might reflect the most expressive Putin’s activity among global political achievements, meaning, his “making inventory” – this time of the political capital. We don’t know – and Medvedev is to care to convince us legally - not having right to know - which way Russia is going to revise the issue of her ownership, but at least one outcome is certain – Russians will dare to posses again! As in Tolstoy’s case – it might easily become the target of “others within us”, unless Russia reshuffles defensive intelligence of highest transparency being the true subjective value of her people. Saying simple – effective intelligence is building transparency, not mirrors. Loving Russia one can see deeper, but it is wrong pursuit to search over there for just another mirror or adding just another brick in the Wall of vanity.