VERSIONS: روسيا اليوم NOTICIAS FREEVIDEO ИНОТВ RTД RSS
breakingnews
Go to main page   Politics   Cyber attacks a cover for internet-censorship in US – radio host   Comments  
MORE ON THE STORY
31.10.2009, 06:23 6 comments

“It is Ron Paul’s destiny to run for president” – Alex Jones

There's speculation congressman Ron Paul may run for presidency again in 2012. Despite two failed attempts, radio host Alex Jones is confident the Texas Republican will give the presidency another shot.

Trek Nawa, Afghanistan, during Operation Mako, Sept. 21, 2010. (Official Marine Corps photo by Sgt. Mark Fayloga) 07.10.2010, 11:43 3 comments

US soldiers' online activities helping Taliban recruitment

Today, the war in Afghanistan enters its tenth year with little sign of an end.

31.07.2009, 22:17

“There’s no such thing as cyber terrorism”

“Both cyber terrorism and cyber warfare are concepts that are gross exaggerations of what’s possible through Internet attacks,” the Director of Information Policy Studies at the CATO Institute, Jim Harper, told RT.

21.05.2010, 18:07 11 comments

Drawing attention to Mohammed

Five years after a Danish paper was fiercely criticized by Muslims for depicting the Prophet Mohammed in derogatory cartoons, Facebook and YouTube are under fire from Pakistan.

Mistakes acknowledged: US soldiers question a man in Iraq (AFP: Oliver Laban-Mattei, file photo) 24.10.2010, 21:54 4 comments

“Increased secrecy breeds corruption” – WikiLeaks spokesperson

Governments should work on decreasing secrecy around its activities, believes WiliLeaks spokesman Kristinn Hrafnsson.

27.07.2010, 17:46 21 comments

US “sparked Russian spy sensation” in wake of WikiLeaks broadside

In an effort to distract attention from the release of thousands of secret documents on the Afghanistan War, the US rounded up 11 Russian “spies” according to internal sources.

08.07.2010, 18:14 13 comments

A Tweet too far: US editor latest victim of Internet Inquisition

A CNN senior editor is the latest high-ranking casualty in the virtual world of social blogging where a personally-held sentiment is becoming the ticket to an early retirement and worse.

30.06.2009, 10:52 8 comments

UK fears “Cybergeddon”

Terrorists are planning a deadly new attack: this time online – that’s the fear of the UK government, which has announced the creation of a national cyber army to counter web assaults on the country’s infrastructure.

03.08.2010, 12:55 9 comments

Putin-Medvedev tandem to become a troika?

Dmitry Medvedev has said he does not know who may be running for the presidency in 2012. Although he mentioned that possibly he or Putin may run, the current president also hinted at an as of yet unknown third party.

Election 2012
Image from photoshare.ru 23.10.2010, 22:28 5 comments

“Start imagining the war or stop supporting it” – WikiLeaks head

The shocking WikiLeaks release, which has revealed thousands of unreported civilian casualties in Iraq, is the most accurate picture of war ever made, and it is food for thought, says the website’s editor-in-chief.

Cyber attacks a cover for internet-censorship in US – radio host

Published: 06 February, 2010, 07:19
Edited: 01 June, 2010, 22:36


Radio host Alex Jones sees the new steps to protect the US from cyber attacks as attempts to curb the freedom of speech.

 
10 COMMENTS
Sarah February 06, 2010, 18:59 quote
0

The eyes of God are watching everything and so are the horns of the goat and her friend disease. Who blinds who? Some of us will get through no matter. If there's a will (survival), there's a way.

lawbreaker1776 February 06, 2010, 22:22 quote
0

alex jones is bought and paid for by the zionists. the jews own every piece of america, but who does alex jones blame for the distruction of america? video game players and people who watch football. he actually said on the air that muslims own hollywood. i promise, he said it. alex jones is designed to make real patriots look stupid. us americans have to restore our constitutional government, and we can't do that by denying the obvious fact that we have been conquered by israel. alex jones will never admit that, because he is no less a traitor to america than the top leadership of the republican and democrat parties.

Buckpwnz February 07, 2010, 12:49 quote
0

February 06, 2010, 22:22, lawbreaker1776 wrote > alex jones is bought and paid for by the zionists. the jews own every piece of america, but who does alex jones blame for the distruction of america? video game players and people who watch football. he actually said on the air that muslims own hollywood. i promise, he said it. alex jones is designed to make real patriots look stupid. us americans have to restore our constitutional government, and we can't do that by denying the obvious fact that we have been conquered by israel. alex jones will never admit that, because he is no less a traitor to america than the top leadership of the republican and democrat parties. Dam straight. Don't listen to Alex Jones, find out for yourself. And then you may find out Alex has his own agenda, and he is just an opportunist like all his sponsors and guests. He removes comments on his wwebsite when you question him... lol. I'm glad he is waking people up because they will see what his motives are when they do wake up and check him out.

Schnersson February 08, 2010, 00:03 quote
0

Whoever pays him, Alex Jones is among the few to provide uncensored information in the West... (Why do we need to watch RT to know what really happens in our countries?)

ShaunH February 08, 2010, 00:51 quote
0

This move by the U.S. government is concurrent with moves of other governments around the world such as Australia and China. The free exchange of ideas is dangerous to any authority seeking absolute control over free thought. We should be ever vigilant and skeptical of any move by government to control or suppress the free exchange of ideas whether it is the internet or the press. Any point of view ought to be looked at with skepticism whether it's a talk show host or a government agency. Unfortunately, some people use ad hominem attacks or sophistry to defeat an issue. Who Mr. Jones is funded by or owned by isn't really the question in this case. The point is whether or not his point is valid and whether this move by the US government is a threat to the free exchange of ideas by way of the internet or ultimately the suppression of the American peoples freedom of speech. Using an analogy, I dare say we oppose slavery. Thomas Jefferson was a slave owner, did that make his views, words, and his participation in the forming of the republic irrelevant regarding government? The "poisoning the well" fallacy used here to denigrate the message by way of attacking the messenger shows intellectual infantilism. Perhaps it would be best to argue for or against the merit of his points, rather than against the man. You can do that in your blogs, at least while you still have the freedom to do so.

lawbreaker1776 February 08, 2010, 19:08 quote
0

see here's the thing about alex jones, he reads all of these websites too, and if some people decide to discuss the truth about alex and the fact that he is a shill for the zionists, all of a sudden people will show up in droves to defend him. HIS PEOPLE. granted there are a few people who are just beginning to wake up that will defend him on their own because they honestly don't know any better, but if you are honest in wanting to seek the truth, you must ultimately come to the conclusion that he is funded to make the growing resistance in america to zionist occupation look stupid. the argument that it doesn't matter who funds him and that he provides uncensored news is simply not true. he will never question israels very real acts of terrorism against america designed to get us to fight all their wars for them, he will never question the fact that no matter who the president is, he is going to be surrounded by zionist jews whose allegiance is to israel and israel alone, and he will never question why every aspect of american media is controlled by zionist jews whose only goal is the destruction of america, and a one world government that will enslave the world. comparing him to thomas jefferson is not accurate, he should more realistically be compared to a magician who has mastered slight of hand. with one hand he presents 9-11 as an inside job, and the subjugation of america and the world to a satanic global government, and then with the other hand he blames everybody but those responsible. honestly ask yourselves, is the new world order really a nazi death cult? do muslims really own hollywood? could somebody who has researched the destruction of america for as long as he has really be that naive? no. it is diliberate. why should america alienate russia, who should be our natural ally, for a nation in the middle east that only has 7 million people in it? by him refusing to aknowledge the truth to his listeners, he prevents their coming to the truth, deceptively

Wheat Bread March 06, 2010, 09:39 quote
0

Alex Jones is classic disinformation. He provides a good deal of actual truths, but then he goes off the deep end by making outrageous claims such as the New World Order wants to follow a eugenics agenda or that climate change is a hoax. As a result of the strategic whacked things he says, everything he says becomes discredited. This is a classic CIA technique. Bottom line is there are plenty of credible sources for real news so, do not rely on Alex Jones for info.

Alles Clar March 06, 2010, 12:58 quote
0

Why are people talking about Alex Jones rather than what he has said and the evidence he brought forth? Cass Sunstein, Time Magazine etc.

Mackenzie Weaver June 01, 2010, 20:22 quote
0

I spoke with someone who worked with the NSA on a bus and he informed me that China incessantly commits cyber attacks on the United States, 24/7, 365, and that the attacks were capitalized on as routine training for NSA recruits. Alex Jones implicitly states that cyber attacks from China and/or Russia are "basically non-existent", is basically not true. Even if my source is not credible, just believing that states and governments do not pick at each other through pseudo-cyber warfare is naive. Besides that, there is no way EVER that a state can censor anything over the internet. It is simply not possible because we the people are more than clever enough to bypass any and all attemps. Just check out the failed censorship attempts of www.thepiratebay.org.

halebobbdotcom November 19, 2010, 09:49 quote
0

@lawbreaker1776
That's right! We Jews own everything! Now pay your dues, boy and we'll let you use capital letters again.

POST COMMENT

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our posting rules


CAPTCHA image