&host=rt.com&uri=/politics/iran-nuclear-deal-uranium/&via=(none)&ua=CCBot/1.0 (+http://www.commoncrawl.org/bot.html))
Iran signs uranium swap deal
Published: 17 May, 2010, 15:31
Edited: 21 May, 2010, 02:03
Iran, Tehran: From L to R: Brazilian Foreign Minister Celso Amorim, Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan hold hands after Iran inked a nuclear fuel swap deal in Tehran on May 17, 2010. (AFP Photo / Atta Kenare)
Iran, Brazil and Turkey have signed an agreement under which Iran will ship 1,200 kilos of its low enriched uranium to Turkey in exchange for 120 kilos of nuclear fuel for a Tehran Research Reactor.
The long-awaited UN-backed agreement that may finally resolve the years-long diplomatic deadlock over the Iranian nuclear program was inked in Tehran on Monday by the foreign ministers of the three states. The deal was reached following talks between Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Turkey’s Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan and Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva.
The Islamic Republic News Agency, IRNA, citing Brazil’s Foreign Minister Celso Amorim, writes that the agreement followed two goals: “Admitting Iran's right to benefit from nuclear energy for peaceful purposes and the need for Iran to provide the global community with guarantees in connection with its nuclear program.”
The leaders of the three countries also signed a joint communiqué, IRNA writes.
“We stress commitment to non-proliferation of nuclear weapons and related materials, distinguishing without any discrimination the right of all the members, including Iran, to produce and use nuclear energy and enrich uranium for peaceful purposes,” the statement reads. “We believe that the nuclear fuel swap will serve as ground for cooperation in all fields, especially peaceful nuclear cooperation, including the establishment of a nuclear power plant and research reactor.”
Iranian foreign ministry spokesman Ramin Mehmanparast told reporters that in a week’s time the Islamic Republic will inform the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) on the details of the nuclear swap deal. And then, if an agreement is reached with the so-called Vienna group – made up of the IAEA, France, Russia and the United States – Iran will send the low enriched uranium to Turkey within one month where it would be kept under the UN nuclear watchdog supervision.
The main point of the deal is to prevent Iran from endangering the world by enriching uranium to levels suitable for nuclear weapons production. After sending its uranium to Turkey, the Islamic Republic would in return get nuclear fuel enriched to 20%, which it could use to power the medical research reactor in the capital Tehran.
However, it has not yet been disclosed which country would provide Iran with the fuel rods. According to an agreement proposed in October but dumped by Tehran, the uranium would be sent to Russia and then to France for processing into fuel rods.
Foreign Ministry spokesman Mehmanparast said, IRNA writes, that Iran will continue enriching uranium to 20%. Perhaps it is premature to celebrate the victory of diplomacy in this tangled situation.
So far, no official reaction to the news has followed from Russia or the US. Interfax agency, citing a source in Russia’s Foreign Ministry, writes that Moscow believes it is premature to comment on the deal.
“So far we have not received official information about such understandings and we cannot report any reaction or comment on reports to this end yet,” the source said.
On May 14, President Dmitry Medvedev said that Brazilian leader Lula’s trip to Tehran “may be the last chance” to come to a compromise with the Iranian leadership and avoid UN sanctions. Prior to his visit to the Islamic Republic, the Brazilian president was on an official visit to Moscow.
A number of western governments led by the US have not been enthusiastic about reaching a nuclear deal with Iran because of the political nature of the problem, insists Foad Izadi, a Politics Professor from the University of Tehran. “If they reach a deal with Iran that political pretext is going to be out of their hands.”
US investigative journalist Webster Tarpley told RT that the Iranian nuclear deal brokered by Turkey and Brazil is a disaster for the US strategy aimed at isolating Tehran.
Once the deal between Brazil, Iran and Turkey is signed, Iran hopes that the US and other Western governments will follow suit.
Despite the West being skeptical about the peaceful nature of Iran’s nuclear program, the very fact of signing the deal supports the idea that the West has “indirectly accepted the idea that Iran is allowed to enrich uranium inside the country… which is acceptable under international law,” the professor concluded.
The deal is a real breakthrough, achieved after months of tough negotiation, believes Vladimir Sotnikov, a political expert from the Institute of World Economy and International Relations in Moscow, but “we should wait and see until this agreement is really implemented and Iran actually repatriates its uranium to Turkey.”
Sotnikov adds that Turkey is keen to play the middleman role as it wants to develop its own atomic energy industry, with Russian help, adding that “this is actually legitimizing the role of Turkey in developing nuclear power on its own territory.”
Still,he believes that western countries will not be fully satisfied with the deal and will express “a cautious optimism” at best.
17.05.2010, 15:13
2 comments
ROAR: Russia seeks new ways to solve Middle East, Iran issuesIn recent days the Russian leadership discussed the Iranian nuclear program and the Middle East settlement with the leadership of Turkey, Syria, Brazil and Kuwait. |
17.05.2010, 18:11
2 comments
Kiev greets Medvedev with rain to wash away stained relationsIt is easier to talk with new Ukraine’s leadership, Dmitry Medvedev has declared. The Russian president has come to Kiev for a two-day official visit. |
WORLD SHOULD FOCUS ON ISRAEL'S NUKES,ERDOGAN; Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan says the dispute over Iran's nuclear program has been resolved and the international community should focus on Israel now. "In fact, there is no nuclear weapon in Iran now but Israel, which is also located in our region, possesses nuclear arms. Turkey is the same distance from both of them," Turkey's Star newspaper quoted Erdogan as saying on Tuesday. "What has the international community said against Israel so far? Is this the superiority of law or the law of superiors?" he added. Most experts estimate that Israel has between 100 and 200 nuclear warheads, largely based on information leaked to the Sunday Times newspaper in the 1980s by Mordechai Vanunu, a former worker at the Israel's Dimona nuclear reactor. Israel, which has started several wars in the region in its 60-year history of occupation, maintains a policy of deliberate ambiguity over its nuclear weapons program and does not allow international inspectors to visit its nuclear sites.
What a spoil sport Ahmadinejad is ! Hillary was fuming ! ... that dirty looking unshaven little man .. has wiped out several years of careful preparation for war by the gang of three and a half ( US-UK-France and Italy ) so as they could get petrol from Iran and exchange it for loans from China via the now famous swop's trickery ! Nasty little man ! .... but, may be, not all is lost ! In one or two years the gang of 3.5 may start to say that Turkey , known to all as an Al Queda dominated parliament , has allowed Iran to actually build an atomic bomb and that a prompt intervention is required to stop Ahmadinejad invading California to destroy all gays ! We will have generals, senators, journalists, TV hosts all swearing together with O'Bum boy, that to be true ! If it were not so tragic , it would be the best of Hollywood ! Snowhite
mbach May 17, 2010, 19:58 I think you've been reading the NY Times or WaPo too much (they have tried to make the same connection). There is a clear reason why this is not some Iranian duplicity to upset any sanction vote - any backsliding on Tehrans part would anger both Brasil and Turkey, who have publically comitted to it, as such would deeply embarass the Turkish and Brasilian leadership. Iran is making great efforts to win hearts and minds in the developing world, and there is no way they would throw away the gains they have made. quoteJG May 18, 2010, 02:09 Actually, you are totally incorrect. Iran has not been deceiving the IAEA, and have provided all access as required under the terms of the NPT treaty they have signed and ratified. The IAEA has been making demands for which they have no legal right (like inspections of non-nuclear related facilities, or making demands for enrichment to cease) but have asked for nevertheless. Iran no doubt remembers the experiences of the Iraqis where IAEA "inspection teams" were riddled with US/UK intelligence agents tasked with espionage and target marking. Also, why would Iran forgoe enrichment of their own uranium in exchange for foreign supplies, when experience has taught them that foreign supplies can be cut off as part of political pressure campaigns? Would the UK or France agree to dismantle their own nuclear fuel industries just because Russia or China offer to provide the same for less? And as for Iran turning down nuclear technology ("new efficient reactors" as you claim) well that is just absurd. Please name the nation & nuclear energy companies who have made such offers, and the tech they have offered. The Iranians have gone for the Russian VVER as it was the only option available, and the VVER is a thoroughly modern PWR reactor that produces no more waste than comparable designs.