US slaps new sanctions on Iran, Iran targets Coca-Cola
Published: 02 July, 2010, 15:59
Edited: 16 July, 2010, 15:06
TAGS: Arms, Conflict, Military, Nuclear, Scandal, Obama, Protest, Politics, Law, Iran, Economy
Hot on the heels of UN Security Council sanctions against Iran, US President Barack Obama has signed yet another document imposing even tougher penalties against Iran for its alleged nuclear weapons program.
The Iran Sanctions Act targets exports of gasoline and other refined petroleum products to Iran and bans US banks from doing business with foreign banks providing services to Iran's Revolutionary Guard.
“We are showing the Iranian government that its actions have consequences,” Obama said, warning that if Iran continues its current course, “the pressure will continue to mount, and its isolation will continue to deepen.”
Although Obama insists that the door to diplomacy is still open, he also said, “There should be no doubt – the United States and the international community is determined to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons.”
The US administration hopes the new unilateral sanctions, along with ones approved last month in the UN Security Council and those imposed by the European Union, will yield results even though previous regimens failed to halt Iran's activities that it asserts could be a precursor to nuclear weapons development.
In his political rhetoric, the US president said he had not sought the outcome, arguing it was chosen by an Iranian government which for years has defied UN resolutions and forged ahead with its nuclear programs while supporting terrorist groups and suppressing the Iranian people.
The legislation was approved by US Senate and House in quick succession on June 24, and Obama called the new law the “toughest sanctions against Iran ever passed by the United States Congress.”
Ahmadinejad strikes back
Even as Obama prepared to sign the bill into law, Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad decided that a ban on signature American and Western products – among them Coca-Cola, Intel and IBM – would be a fitting retaliation for the sanctions that the UN Security Council approved last month.
However there are mixed reactions coming from Tehran.
On one hand, Iranian officials dismissed the measures, saying they will have no impact on the country’s nuclear progress. Tehran still insists it is aimed at peaceful energy production, but many global powers have come to the conclusion that the program is being conducted with ambitions of nuclear weapon development.
On the other hand, the Iranian government is lashing out over the international actions against it.
“The Iranian regime is caught in the contradiction of its relations with its own people, especially with a Westernized young society, and its economic relations with the world. And that is why we see these different responses,” says Bahman Baktiari, director of the Middle East Center at the University of Utah in Salt Lake City.
Baktiari says that Obama’s signing of the sanctions will likely impact cab drivers and other service workers the most.
“Those are the people who risk feeling the biggest impact from these petroleum sanctions,” he says. But, he adds, the wildcard in this situation is that it’s a globally popular American president signing the new law.
“Obama is popular, and many Iranians, especially among the young people, think Obama gave a fair shake to the Iranian government with his offer for unconditional dialogue,” he says. “These new sanctions will have an impact on Iran, but there’s a bigger chance now that people will blame that on the government – and not on the US,” Baktiari believes.
And what of Ahmadinejad’s call for a boycott of Coke and other American products?
“The response is ridicule,” Baktiari says. “Even the most rural Iranian knows these products and associates them with America. If Ahmadinejad really wants to stop these products, he’d have to cut off trade with Dubai and everyone knows he’s not going to do that.”
Missiles: made in Tehran
Meanwhile, Western countries are not the only ones prompting reactions from Tehran. After Russia’s decision to freeze the delivery of S-300 defense systems to the Islamic Republic, Iran unveiled efforts aimed at self-sufficiency in passive air defense.
"At present, Iran is on the path to designing long-range missiles used in passive air defense,” Iranian Defense Minister Ahmad Vahidi told reporters on Thursday.
Russia's move, as well as the Kremlin's "Yes" vote to the US-drafted sanctions resolution, drew sharp criticism from Iranian officials.
Despite unveiling plans of creating its own air defense systems, Tehran has warned Moscow that the sanctions are no excuse for reneging on the deal, since the contract was signed before the adoption of UN sanctions.
“The contract for the S-300 missile defense systems was concluded in the past; it is a defense matter and has nothing to do with the resolution,” Iranian Parliament Speaker Ali Larijani said in a press conference.
Russia’s Nezavisimaya Gazeta daily on Wednesday estimated Moscow's losses in breaching the contract to be over $1 billion, including a $400-million penalty likely to be imposed by Tehran.
The US and its European allies have embraced the "costly" Russian move, after convincing the veto-wielding permanent member of the Security Council to join Washington's sanctions campaign.
However, Iranian Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki says Tehran's "overall” ties with its long-time energy partner, Russia, are "positive” despite recent disagreements.
Tesa Arcilla, RT
02.07.2010, 13:55
6 comments
Russia is moving towards the values of Europe - PACE PresidentPACE President Mevlüt Çavuşoğlu said that the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe may soon stop its monitoring of Russia. Çavuşoğlu delivered the message during his official visit to the country. |
ROAR: Cavusoglu helps to “reset” Russian-PACE relationsRussian politicians and analysts appreciate “impartial approach” of the president of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (CoE). |
ormoz, You must be joking, you posts are an effort at satire, yes? The anti-ahmadinejad faction (middle-upper class urbanites) are a minority in Iran and their preferred candidate was SOUNDLY DEFEATED in the election. There was no electral fraud, the accusations are nothing but sour grapes from a defeated candidate who realised he lacked the numbers needed to win, so embarked on a deliberate campaign of smearing the vote to discredit his opponent with the hope that a 2nd election could be called and that he might gain enough sympathy from swing voters to scape a win. His followers likewise cannot accept defeat at the hands of the poor and the working classes, so they vent their frustration on the streets and cry foul. The US, its European vassals, and the western corporate-controlled media endlessly repeat the allegations as part of the ongoing 31-year agitprop and destabilisation campaign waged against Iran. Your ridiculous theories regarding the Zionist state somehow manipulating the vote for an Ahmadinejad victory are utterly absurd. AQ Khan is a friend of the West? France is supplying Iran with yellow-cake? Where do you get these crazy notions? Finally, as for you claiming to have direct and personal experience of the Green protests, I happen to have friends and collegues who are members of the Iranian diaspora, and they all scoff at the propaganda of the Greens and the Western powers. Their views equate firmly with my own, and I would trust their views and experiences far more than any "news" coverage from US media or nameless bloggers.
When it comes to US – Iranian governments relationship one should distinguish between what is happening on the scenes and behind the scenes! I gather from the earlier posts that they all base their discourse on the scenes, ie what we hear from the media, unfortunately including RT. One should prove first that these governments are enemies or are somehow in a dispute over a true matter and then measure their powers and analyse their intensions!! The Iranian government got most of its nuclear know how and technology from the West and Western friends like Abdulqader khan the former energy minister and friend of Parvez Mosharaf and the US. Iran is receiving yellow cake from France as we speak! It was the late ayatollah Khomeini who sent an envoy Ahmad Kashani to Israel with information on the nuclear facilities in Iraq in 1980! That helped Israel bomb it with pin point accuracy. It was him who started the war with Iraq not the US as many posts suggest here! You can ask the UN and the Iranian government for documents and evidence on that!!! Iraq registered a complaint at the UN one month prior to the start of the war and warned Khomeini repeatedly which were ignored! The reason Ahmadinezhad was elected for a second time is just because the Israelies wanted to, yes, listen to the Israeli government how they praise Ahmadinezhad for his services to Israel! Michael Ledeen was in Tehran a few months before the elections!! Who says the Neocons and Builderberg are against the Iranian government and want to attack it??? In fact the Iranian- Israeli and US governments enjoy 30 years of cooperation. Remember financing Contras, passing weapons to Bosnia, creating Hamas against PLO, financing Mujahedeen in Afghanistan and installing the Islamic republic in Iraq are good examples of that fruitful cooperation, so who is against who and why????












Gazza! Why listen to my ridiculous satire go and find out which factory in France is producing yellow cake and find out how many percent of that factory belongs to the Iranian government. When the managers of the factory were asked what they would do if Iran asked for some of the produce, they replied they have a share in the factory so we can’t say no. I think you can find the interviews on utube! Also if you want to know about the US support in Iran’s nuclear program go to raceforiran.com and enjoy more of my satire repeated by the high rankinig CIA agents and friends of Ahmadinezhad!!! As for the green movement you forgot to mention what their leader Moussavi did in 1980 to 1982 in Iran. You see Gazza, you are young and were not even born then, go find out!! The people supporting the green movement would go beyond Moussavi and Islam as soon as they are given the chance, that has not come yet but if you dig about 1980-1982 you will see that this hatered for the Islamic government is much much much deeper than you know!! You think Ahmadinezhad represents the poor?? Find out how much money he and his relatives have stolen. Like the 3 containers that were confiscated in Turkey last year. The shipment was gold, money and narcotics worth $ 35 Billion. A close ally and advisor of Ahmadinezhad was the recipient of the shipment. He never showed up! It was big news coverage in Turkey! The Turkish government said it was God’s gift to Turkey! I think it was Ahmadinezhad’s gift to Turkey!! What do you think the poor Iranian people think of that?? What do you think???