VERSIONS: روسيا اليوم NOTICIAS FREEVIDEO ИНОТВ RTД RSS
breakingnews
Go to main page   Politics   Policy on S.Ossetia, Abkhazia to remain unchanged – Medvedev   Comments  
MORE ON THE STORY
12.08.2010, 16:24 2 comments

ROAR: “Enemies had better not fly to Abkhazia”

As Russia’s military announce the deployment of S-300s in the former Georgia’s republic, analysts say these air defense systems were deployed there two years ago.

Russian President Dmitry Medvedev gestures while delivering a speech while visiting the Russian military base in Gudauta on August 8, 2010  (AFP Photo / RIA Novosti / Kremlin Pool / Dmitry Astakhov) 08.08.2010, 19:27 3 comments

“Recognition of Abkhazia and S. Ossetia prevented bloodbath” – Medvedev

During his visit to Abkhazia, Russia’s President Dmitry Medvedev met with Russian tourists and discussed the 2008 Georgian-South Ossetian war and Russia’s subsequent recognition of Abkhazia and South Ossetia with them.

08.08.2010, 10:21 2 comments

Georgia expands military budget amid rising paranoia

While the Georgian people have set their minds on peace, their leadership is more concerned with war and has spent over thirty times more on its military budget than economic development.

16.07.2010, 15:36 5 comments

Lukashenko & Saakashvili merge in duet against Russia

President Lukashenko, having lost ground in Moscow, has now turned to the Kremlin’s foes and is enjoying warm relations with his former critic Georgian leader Saakashvili. What could be behind this sudden mutual love?

Dmitry Medvedev (AFP Photo / RIA Novosti / Kremlin Pool / Dmitry Astakhov) 20.10.2009, 20:32 4 comments

Parallels between Kosovo and South Ossetia “inappropriate” – Medvedev

Dmitry Medvedev has warned against inappropriate parallels between the Kosovo events and last summer's Georgian attack on South Ossetia. He said, however, both events proved the failure of the European security system.

09.10.2009, 15:43 1 comment

“No reply” from Moscow to Ukraine’s invitation

Leaders of former Soviet republics are in Moldova for the CIS Summit on Friday. The official request from Kiev to arrange a meeting between Medvedev and Yushchenko has been met with a mute response from Russia.

Dmitry Medvedev at Stanford University in Palo Alto, California (AFP Photo / Tony Avelar) 24.06.2010, 13:03 18 comments

Medvedev might run for second term if plans work

Russian President Dmitry Medvedev has announced that he may run in the 2012 presidential elections.

03.08.2010, 12:55 9 comments

Putin-Medvedev tandem to become a troika?

Dmitry Medvedev has said he does not know who may be running for the presidency in 2012. Although he mentioned that possibly he or Putin may run, the current president also hinted at an as of yet unknown third party.

Election 2012
RIA Novosti / Alexay Nikolskiy 04.03.2010, 19:44 6 comments

Russian PM hopes to get back to before-crisis relations with Georgia

Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin says he hopes Russian-Georgian relations will get back to a “normal level” while meeting with the Georgian opposition leader in Moscow.

23.03.2009, 13:24

Secret doc exposes Georgia as aggressor

The European Union commission on the war in South Ossetia has received a document claiming that this summer's war in South Ossetia was started by Georgia, says Germany’s Spiegel Online.

Policy on S.Ossetia, Abkhazia to remain unchanged – Medvedev

Published: 13 August, 2010, 16:27
Edited: 17 August, 2010, 13:33


Russian President Dmitry Medvedev (R) meets with South Ossetia leader Eduard Kokoity in Sochi on August 13, 2010

Moscow’s policy towards supporting South Ossetia and Abkhazia remains unchanged, President Dmitry Medvedev said at a meeting with his Ossetian counterpart Eduard Kokoity.

 
7 COMMENTS
joseph walker August 13, 2010, 22:09 quote
0

The people want to have the Russians to protect them and have closer ties economically etc,etc.,end of story.

Dimitri August 14, 2010, 04:24 quote
0

Russia itself is a Russian Federation. Hence in the time when Basques are trying to be independent from Madrid as well as french speaking Belgians are keen to split the country (and these are small independence movements in Europe compared to Russia )- it is not really wise of Russian Federation(largest country in the world by its territory) to support breakaway states on its borders. Look at Yugoslavia in early nineties - they were all neighbours until they have taken sides with their religion and ethnicity - and this can happen in Russia if the policy remains unchanged. A russian proverb "do not spit in the well you will be drinking from(exact translation)" comes to mind.

max August 14, 2010, 10:11 quote
0

Russian troop should have taken the whole Georgia and liberate all Georgian from their mentally ill President.

Biloxi August 14, 2010, 20:57 quote
0

The gene of altruism is far more valuable than the baubles of globalism. Stopping the MODERN move in the idea of a new world order to bring in the so-called perfect solution to all governments' problems - how to keep the people in a state of ignorance in the U.S. and but of course the master of us, Crowns of Europe. Russia's leaders were far sighted and hind sighted too, to know the real truth about colonialism dressed up as CDOs. Thankfully, the gene of altruism birthed the enlightenment in Russia's decision to protect the plan of nature, clearly, to develop in NOT a Hollywood Truman Show of USBS: S.Ossetia and Abkhazia! Whew, it was too close for comfort, though.

Kihnu August 16, 2010, 01:01 quote
0

Medvedev is astute enough to know that the Georgian troops were digging in to defend Tbilisi. The Russian 58th Army was not string enough to take Tbilisi and the Russian troops would have been trapped as the Germans were at Stalingrad. The only way Russian could have conquered Tbilsis is if the American trained and supplied troops suffered total panic and collapse. That would have changed the strategic balance, if NATO had come into Georgia, Russia would have had no choice but to back down, which would not have been good. In retrospect, Medvedev made the right decision which he accepted Nicolas Sarkozy's brokered "peace deal".

Artyom August 16, 2010, 11:46 quote
0

Dmitri you have it backwards. The republics in the Caucuses watched Russia carefully to how it responded. The fact that Russia showed willingness to defend and protect the rights of Osstians, reassured those in the republics that they are important to Moscow. Only parts are in danger do to intelligence agencies and foreign funding to extremist and ethnic minorities in the remote regions of Dagestan. The poverty in some regions and lack of infrastructure makes easy breeding grounds for real terrorists. The FSB and Interior Ministry having special operations there makes people witnesses to death and can also increase recruitment. They need economic development and law and order while fighting corruption. That is a difficult task, but it is important. The FSB is better to search for external financial roots an eliminate them while building a strong economy for the people there.

MEJanssen August 17, 2010, 08:22 quote
0

The Georgian troops were utterly routed, even with the "moral support" offered by the American contractors there who had just trained the Georgians with all that new equipment. I wondered at first why Russian troops did not enter the capitol and burn down the presidential palace, until I saw a map published by Spiegel news. The map showed where all the military bases were in Georgia, and that happened to overlap almost 100% with a map showing the sites of battles. The Russians avoided the capitol because there was nothing interesting there. What the army did was go AROUND Tbilisi and attack the 4 military bases around the capitol. I just laughed when I realized what had happened, and that I could predict where the next battle would be. I really think the Russian army shocked the plotters in Washington DC, because we did not expect either that Russia would invade or, if they did, that they would actually win. Then we had the nerve to demand return of 4 Hummers the army had captured, or a cash payment. I'm not sure which we wanted more, the equipment or the cash. That war was a fiasco on many levels, but not for the Russians.

POST COMMENT

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our posting rules


CAPTCHA image