Double or quits: Russia has to succeed in modernization
Published: 28 May, 2010, 18:18
Edited: 27 September, 2010, 15:56
Russian President Dmitry Medvedev speaks at his meeting with leaders of the ruling United Russia party in the Gorki residence outside Moscow, Russia, Friday, May 28, 2010
TAGS: Meeting, Medvedev, Russia, Politics, Modernization
President Medvedev has expressed confidence that Russia will succeed in modernization, noting that there is “no other opportunity” and that failure would lead to disintegration in the country.
Speaking on Friday at a meeting with the representatives of the majority party United Russia, Dmitry Medvedev said that he is sure that the country will succeed in modernization. He noted, though, that “it must be carried out quickly and qualitatively, making it attractive for people and business.”
According to Medvedev, “we have no other opportunity”. “If we fail in carrying out modernization, a disintegration of the country and degradation of the economy will follow. This suits none of us,” the president stated.
The president noted that a lot of work has been done in recent years and “the country has been developing in an absolutely correct direction." Russian people "have managed to strengthen the state, reform the economy, and create a framework for the political system," he said as quoted by Itar-Tass.
However, Medvedev admitted that "the country has been moving not that fast as we would like it to."
"Now the time has come to change the paradigm of development, not to strengthen what has been achieved, but to engage in the development of the whole of society and the economy," he said.
At the beginning of the meeting, Boris Gryzlov – one of the party’s leaders and the speaker of the State Duma – presented a report on the situation in the country and outlined the main problems and possible ways to address them.
According to the politician, increasing the productivity of labor fourfold – as it is set by the document “Strategy-2020” which was approved earlier – “will be not easy.”
What makes matters more complicated is that there is a deficit in workforce in some parts of the country. “First of all, those [parts] are Siberia and the Far East,” Gryzlov said. “I believe we should create attractive conditions to facilitate internal migration to those territories.” As an example, he suggested that people willing to move and work in the east of the country would be provided with land.
The danger of high oil prices
Medvedev declared that extremely high oil prices would become an obstacle for Russia’s modernization.
“Bluntly speaking, $140 for a barrel is a catastrophe for Russia,” he stated. “It means the destruction of all stimuli for development," he said, Interfax quotes.
He went on to say that it is typical not for everyone to monitor oil price movements on the Internet.
"The fact that it is already fluctuating in the $70-$80 range is great, it's good fortune. It means the budget is already pulsating; it is already possible to do nothing. And if it's 90, then it's possible to totally relax. What modernization? Why bother with it? There will be money to carry out social programs," Medvedev said.
Nevertheless, the president noted that Russia would like its energy resources to sell well and prices would not be too low.
Epoch of direct democracy makes a comeback
Direct democracy is coming back to Russia and the Internet is playing a key role in the entire process, Medvedev said.
“I believe you will agree with me that we are standing on the brink of an epoch that will mark a return from representative democracy to direct democracy to a certain extent with the help of the Internet,” he said as quoted by Interfax.
According to the Russian head of state, representative democracy used to be seen as the supreme democracy founded on the principle of elected individuals representing the people. Now, however, the idea that representative democracy is the best form of government has become obsolete.
“Considering the level of education of our citizens and in the world as a whole, I am absolutely sure that elements of direct democracy – not just discussions on crucial issues, sociology and discussions in the Internet blogs – but precisely direct democracy will enter our life,” Medvedev stated.
The country’s leader is certain that in the future the number of democratic institutions – such as the Internet – will increase.
“The Internet has become an important source of information for a large number of young and not very young people – like me,” Medvedev said. That, according to Medvedev, indicates that “the information revolution has happened” and a political force which wants to remain in power should keep that in mind.
“I believe United Russia understands that,” he added.
28.05.2010, 15:47
1 comment
ROAR: Russia makes position on Moldova & Transdniester clearMoscow supports the territorial integrity of Moldova, but wants a special status for the breakaway Transdniester Republic. |
29.05.2010, 03:54
3 comments
Deal reached on nuclear weapons in the Middle EastThe United Nations month-long conference on the Nuclear Non-proliferation treaty ended May 28 with a unanimously adopted declaration. |
Russia is isloated, not dependent, and as Western civilization falls to its own imperfections, they will come into control because they have oil and farming land in a climate that forces a certain set of values and Europe, our counterpart, will have to switch to them while we'll struggle with Africa. So while they're behind now, it won't be forever. They just aren't wasting resources by tying everyone into a losing system for like 1% of the population and making the likelihood of the rest ever succeeding in a prideful way zero. If the individual has to fight for wealth to survive, then you'll see a flux of negative values because not everybody is driven like that and not everybody should be rich because that gives them power. Russia has already seen the demonic side of wealth with oil tycoons and arms dealers. They haven't done that much but get lucky. Of course, once they have wealth, they can secure other forms of worth but some don't and then they transform the value system. Once everybody is locked into it, there isn't an escape because ordinary people can only move in so many directions, and it hurts the economy because its inefficient to only serve a small part of the populaton. That's been hindering to developed countries for the last few decades in general, along with the middle class sadly. In a world full of people only some want to fly.
Every country and its related resources are unique in theirs own qualification.Every country needs the global compatibility in"MARKET"theory;as well as Local Harmony in"INTEGRATION"theory,However make a balance of internal+external trade with respect to the Individual"CITIZEN"theory.Its not appropriate to say that,"If loose the speed,we will disintegrate";rather it seems as a effect first and cause later.Russian might is unmatchable,But the west(mostly by the misuse of power)has succeeded in global theory of marketing of,even theirs inferiority on many products/goods/services.It will be suitable to increase the marketability of Russian internals,at every cost;without compromising on National Integration.The world will not remain as it is,for the next2-3-4-5decades;which will see the various ups/downs.So,the theory of Marketing doesn't applies exclusively on Russia,Rather its a very good time,when the other booming economies are on decline+depression+negative growth,Brazil+Russia+India+China(B-RICh:sounds"BE RICH")can take it as an advantage,to compensate these time in favour.No any single Premier of any country can drive from cause to effect,But when the system goes in fine tuning with the futuristic requirements,the Resilience+Longevity+Opportunities comes naturally.Amid the booming economy; problem of China+India is theirs vast population,whereas the positive is theirs bigger consumer market.The Russian have booming economy,but failing against the adequate number or at least a proportionate number of population(Human Resources).Whereas Brazilians have booming economy,but more than one disturbing factors. Therefore,its the time,to exchange the excess for the good for self.If You will seed today with vision+care+predictions for2-3decades,the result will be more robust+competitive+ marketable. As soon as"BE RICH"will put a combined vision,they will definitely WIN!World is far from revolutions,its a time for spatial resolution,to MAKE the puzzle,not crack for others!












I think, one of the problem which makes Russian government being nervous about -- the disintegration of the country escalated and pushed by the external forces. While the West and now rising Eastern powers actively depleting their local resources, Russia retaining them due to inability to use them (old-fashion and ineffective machinery/technology and lack of enough population). Thus, when other technologically advanced nations will come for the Russian resources, they will be unstoppable. Without being able to protect those resource and itself, Russia will be divided on several smaller countries. Modernization for Russia was always a big problem. And this is not because Russia doesn't have enough people capable of designing and conducting self-modernization. The major problem -- the drain of talent pool. Russia spends a big deal of efforts for creating such talents, but, at the end of the day many of them end up in the West carrying with them knowledge, skills, and money. Another problem -- the reforms are conducted by bureaucrats the vast majority of whom are mediocre and selfish individuals having power to control talents. As history shows, it requires huge problems (revolutions or wars) in the country to unleash the talents and let them lead. The Russians should find the proper political and economical organization of the country, which would ends its "traditional" lifestyle -- economical booms during and short after crisis, and stagnation during periods of peace. I believe, Medvedev is having this in mind, when he refers to direct vs. representative democracy. The thing, though, -- the direct democracy is not solution either. It works only under very special conditions. Even Greece, the inventor of democracy, demonstrated this. The democracy brought it to its heights, and the same democracy destroyed it, when conditions were changed.