Director's directives
Published: 27 October, 2010, 17:48
Edited: 31 October, 2010, 16:02
Nikita Mikhalkov playing Czar Alexander III in his 1998 movie The Barber of Siberia
TAGS: Conflict, Election, Putin, Russia, Politics, Law, History, Psychology
Nikita Mikhalkov goes beyond directing actors and cameras. He’s sent a 63-page political manifesto to the Kremlin.
The director was never shy to share his views with the world.
His movies are more than just a story told in a creative way – they are more like cinematographic sermons that leave few viewers guessing the moral. But now it seems Russia's most acclaimed director is ready to test his talent in real life, with his script being a 63-page political manifesto.
In glow of the sun
Born with a silver spoon in his mouth, Mikhalkov learned from an early age, to combine what seems incompatible. His family ancestry can be traced to dukes and princesses, yet they enjoyed a pretty cozy relationship with the communist party's leadership. His father authored lyrics for both Soviet and Russian national anthems, trumpeting the country's sacredness, greatness and uniqueness.
Mikhalkov Junior said he wholeheartedly believes that Russia is sacred, great and unique – so much so that conventional forms of government would not fit it.
Mikhalkov's most famous production to date, "Burnt by the Sun", earned him numerous honors, including an Oscar and the Grand Prize at Cannes, for his poignant portrayal of the paranoid atmosphere of Joseph Stalin's Great Terror. Yet, he remains an outspoken supporter of the iron fist as a model for ruling, rather than governing Russia.
A strong supporter of Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin, Mikhalkov co-authored an open letter asking Putin not to step down after the expiry of his presidential term in 2008, even though that would have violated the Constitution.
Down with liberal democracy
A year in the making, the manifesto calls on Russia to put an end to its fascination with liberal democracy, choosing instead so-called enlightened conservatism as its ideology.
“The current social order is a volatile mixture of West-oriented liberal modernization, arbitrariness of local bureaucrats and pervasive corruption. It's not good enough for most Russians. Behind the facade of economic reforms and liberal institutions hide traditional, archaic social relationship,” wrote Mikhalkov in an apparent reference to the modernization campaign proclaimed by President Dmitry Medvedev to be one of his top priorities. Mikhalkov also pointed out that Russia needs new leaders capable of “seeing and hearing their people.”
“People are tired of declarations on political independence. They are tired to hear calls for individual freedoms. They don't believe in fairy-tales about wonders of market economy. The euphoria over liberal democracy is over! It's time to get down to work!”
Mikhalkov's recipe for taking Russia forward includes further strengthening the role of the state and nurturing people's trust in the government.
“But first and foremost we have to start believing in our Russia, strengthen the spirit of our nation and to recreate the positive image of our country around the world.”
Enlightened conservatism
While calling for a stronger state, Mikhalkov also identified civil society as one of the engines of the country's growth.
“We are convinced that only a fair combination of freedom and power based on the unity of TRUTH and LAW can provide for a normal human life – without revolutions and counter-revolutions.”
It is this unity of truth and law that, according to Mikhalkov, lay the foundation of the new ideology he termed “enlightened conservatism.”
“This is a philosophy of growth and stability. The philosophy of consolidation. The philosophy of bringing together mature and responsible social forces and creative energies.”
Mikhalkov said that people voting for conservatives hold law and order as their top values. They share pride in their country and demand respect of their human rights.
“The electoral base of Russian conservatives embraces all healthy elements of our society. Its heart is Russia's budding middle class. That is the good-willed and responsible, law-abiding, entrepreneurial, though not necessarily wealthy citizens.”
For Mikhalkov, to be a conservative means “to love God and people, to honor ancestors and care for descendants and to protect the environment as if it were a living being.”
One nation under God
Mikhalkov is known for his at times extreme Russian nationalist views and they fully revealed themselves in his manifesto. He holds that “the unique Russian nation” is a product of centuries-long coexistence of various peoples and tribes that came about “by God's will”.
“We have a special, supranational, imperial mentality that defines our being in the Eurasian system of coordinates. The rhythm of our development and the territory of our responsibility are measured by continental standards… Failure to understand Russia's role and place in the world is dangerous at the very least. At most, it could be fatal because it can lead to the death of the Orthodox civilization, to the disappearance of the Russian nation and to the dismemberment of the Russian state.”
Time of essence
While Mikhalkov has long been politically active, he never ran for office. In 2000, he was rumored to nominate his candidacy for presidency but it never came about. His manifesto looks very much like a political platform for the 2012 presidential election, but it remains to be seen whether he'd choose to compete for the lead role or play a more customary part of director.
Oksana Boyko, RT
Khodorkovsky claims his guilt not provenFormer Yukos chief Mikhail Khodorkovsky claims the prosecution failed to establish his guilt in the second criminal case against him and his partner, Menatep ex-director, Platon Lebedev. |
27.10.2010, 18:57
1 comment
Leaders of Azerbaijan, Armenia discuss Nagorno-Karabakh settlement in RussiaThe presidents of Russia, Azerbaijan and Armenia have held talks on the Nagorno-Karabakh settlement, in a new effort to find a solution to the conflict between Baku and Yerevan. |
PR101, Well said. I feel the same way: Michalkov is a great director and a thinking man. I would agree with some of his views about uniqueness of Russia and its path, about Putin being very important to Russia's stability and about protection of the environment. I was surprised though to hear about his push back to orthodoxy as a primary religion. Russia has for a long time been a successful multicultural country, this is its strength and its future. The use of "national icons" like Tzar, orthodoxy, etc., are viewed by some as a means of solidifying national identity, which in their view may be threatened. Some believe that unlimited immigration from former Sov. republics, China and other countries, many with different cultures and religions, undermines Russia's economy and stability. Some oppose that fearing that primary population will be irreversibly diluted if such practices are not stopped, much like the opposition to Muslim immigration in Europe. But that's a completely different issue - the solution is to change immigration laws to attract highly educated, valuable specialists and discourage uneducated, low wage immigration. That has nothing to do with religion or nationality. The difference between Putin and Michalkov, although I admire both in their own way, is that Putin understands this and Michalkov doesn't. I hope the latter doesn't consider running for president in 2012. It will be a waste.
Multinational/multicultural environment is the best thing Russia has. This is the essence of Russia. This what makes it being unique and self-driven. It determines its strength and its dynamics. Ignoring this fact, and promoting any mono-culture and mono-ideology would be the biggest mistake Russians would make today and biggest harm for Russia. This is why I am very concern when Russians start looking at "old Russia" or at any pure European models... PR101, I have this feeling that Russians are looking in the deep past, because, at this point they don't know what to choose. The Soviet System failed. The last decades showed that the Western type of democracy is not working well either. So, they look in the past and see that "stable and strong" Russia in its Golden Era. One thing they ignore, though -- the world has changed. The imperialism is not something what is popular today. And it is not coming back, unless there is another world war or big global disaster which would push the humanity back to the middle ages. Besides, if we recollect the roots of the October Revolutions of 1917, one of the basic slogan of it was -- transform Russia from the "prison of nations" to the country where everybody would be equal and free. The Tzarist Russia is a bad model to follow. It is a road to nowhere... What I am thinking, why to rush? Why everything must be determined and answered today? Why would not just use very simple formula like "do everything what benefits average Russian citizen" and let everything else float freely and self-determining its shape and self-adjusting its structure during the "journey"?... Ironically, this would, probably, bring back a lot of elements of the Soviet System. With all its advantages and problems. But, what is a big deal? Some others (including the US and Europe) are working hard today to reproduce the their versions of the Soviet Union anyway...












“People are tired of declarations on political independence. They are tired to hear calls for individual freedoms. They don't believe in fairy-tales about wonders of market economy. The euphoria over liberal democracy is over! It's time to get down to work!” 1) Political independence is crucial, I'm not tired of declarations on it! 2) Tired of calls for individual freedoms? Did we ever have them?? So we have to call more for them and work more to get them one day. 3) I don't believe in fairy-tales about wonders of market economy. I believe in the truth about wonders of market economy when there are respected laws which make such wonders possible. Look at Singapore, South Korea, Malasia. Even China. 4) Euphoria over liberal democracy is over?? You're kidding me? How can anything be over if it never existed?! 5) It's time to get to work. - Really? Without Mikhalkov I would never know that!!