Missile defense sparks diplomatic offensive

November 28, 2011 12:36

Russia could review its relations with NATO on the critically-important issue of Afghanistan if it does not react to Moscow’s statements made in response to America’s missile defense plans, Russia's envoy to the alliance has said.

View full story

Comments (12) Sort by: highest rating oldest first newest first

Hahahaha 29.11.2011 13:05

PR1oh1 wrote in #7
New World Order wrote in #1
Russia need so stop with almost always half measure statements and make bold statement and draw a line on the sands and let NATO respond with concrete measures or alas! The NATO knows only concrete positions. Line in the sand......or What?? NATO is growing because other countries want to isolate themselves from Russia. Don't you get it?? And the NATO Missile defense is surrounding Russia? No it isn't. Russia has a long border, but they may feel themselves squeezed if you count China in the equation.
Rus sia must pay for its crimes for occupying half of Europe, they installed puppet regimes in East Germany, the baltics, Poland, Romania etc that were never elected and when elections were held they recieved less then 3% of the total vote on average. Now they joined NATO so Russia can never ever threaten anyone ever again without being destroyed itself.

+2

Undo

The Grand Master Cee 29.11.2011 11:04

   &n bsp;   Since the disolution of the Soviet Union by Boris Yeltsin, Russia has stepped back when it comes to the defence of its own interests! It had to give up Cuba for the sake of good relations with the American government! Mikhail Gorbachev had to withdraw all of Russia's nuclear weapons from Berlin, within two years while America's stayed put -betraying the agreement Russia signed with George Bush Snr.; has to allow East Germany eventually to join NATO and thus, the Pri-Baltics States!         What the heck has Russia got back in return? It became surrounded with military bases and the proposed stationing of missile defence systems in Romania and Poland! How much does Russia want to give up before it says enough! The American govern ment aint the only government that has interests! It's time for Dmitry Medvedev to make that crystal clear!  

+1

Undo

gunshipdemocracy 29.11.2011 10:09

@NWO - USA and their NATO puppets know only one language - of  force. All their words are just lies. They will speak about peace making wars. This must end one or another way.

+1

Undo

gunshipdemocracy 29.11.2011 10:03

c'mon guys - for Europe and foremost for the USA resources must be cheap. Other=wise their speculative assumptions about their own "Uebermeschkeit" fails.

But how can you have cheap resources if you do not invade?  Kadafii was stupid not buying lot's a of S-300PMU. 30 fried Rafales and 30 disintegrated Eurofighters would make great news ;D

+1

Undo

PR1oh1 28.11.2011 23:08

Bogdanov (unregistered) wrote in #4
I do not understand the NATO agenda. Actually, I put it differently -- I do not understand Europeans. Without Russian and the Middle East resources (oil and gas), Europe will plunge to chaos. Guaranteed. Yet , they foolishly trying to spoil relationships with both resource suppliers. If Yankees do it deliberately (putting Europe in mess and keep it low), then their intellectual abilities are rising in my eyes. Though, I suspect, that they try to do the best they can and their deeds go from one disaster to disaster. As usual... This does not make any sense at all. First, the US is allies with Europe so they would not want them weakened. And Europe is limiting its dependence on Russian resources and diversifying to the extent possible. I do not think Europe has weakened its relationship with the middle east; on the contrary it has probably strengthened it.

+4

Undo

PR1oh1 28.11.2011 22:59

New World Order wrote in #1
Russia need so stop with almost always half measure statements and make bold statement and draw a line on the sands and let NATO respond with concrete measures or alas! The NATO knows only concrete positions. Line in the sand......or What?? NATO is growing because other countries want to isolate themselves from Russia. Don't you get it?? And the NATO Missile defense is surrounding Russia? No it isn't. Russia has a long border, but they may feel themselves squeezed if you count China in the equation.

+2

Undo

Billy (unregistered) 28.11.2011 22:25

It is adequate to ask one self, what indeed does USNato mean by underlining the fact that they could engage in two large scale and six medium scale wars simultanously??? That is just plain madness and the sign of meglomania and plans to destroy the world by force!!! You Russians are doing the rigtht thing by sending that clear sign to Syria, that it's not alone. And the response from USNato will be very interesting. But  i'm pretty sure they have had the idea that they are the only force with the rigtht  to go whereever they choose! I think it is also a wise move to find out, and discuss this" AMD problem" with the Chinese leaders! And still holding the negosiations door open to the USNato, up to the "point of no return" which i'm sure you will know when you reach it!!! May all good forces and God be with you on this world peace mission!!!

+1

Undo

Mike (unregistered) 28.11.2011 19:22

Kihnu (unregistered) wrote in #2
When will Russia ever learn If Russia is so weak, then why your masters do not just come and take all its natural resources for free :)Nobody takes you seriously here, boy. You can plug NATO flag right into the hole all your comments are coming from. NATO won't give a damn if a member like your miserable country gets in trouble.

+4

Undo

Bogdanov (unregistered) 28.11.2011 19:17

I do not understand the NATO agenda. Actually, I put it differently -- I do not understand Europeans. Without Russian and the Middle East resources (oil and gas), Europe will plunge to chaos. Guaranteed. Yet , they foolishly trying to spoil relationships with both resource suppliers. If Yankees do it deliberately (putting Europe in mess and keep it low), then their intellectual abilities are rising in my eyes. Though, I suspect, that they try to do the best they can and their deeds go from one disaster to disaster. As usual...

+1

Undo

Karl-2010 28.11.2011 14:12

NATO under Pentagon leadership is playing dangerous high stake game that may turn deadly. I have no way of knowing but I find it hard to believe that NATO bombing of Pakistani’s checkpoint two days ago was an accident. NATO is hitting and testing lot of pressure points . Russia must take notice and act firmly and wisely before the entire world is engulfed to nuclear war.

+12

Undo

Kihnu (unregistered) 28.11.2011 13:53

When will Russia ever learn that the US-NATO Axis is not their "partner"???
Russ ia is militarily so weak that it has been reduced to begging this Axis not to surround them with missiles. Sad situation for the Russia. No wonder the US-NATO Axis does not respect Russia, nor care what Russian interests are.

0

Undo

New World Order 28.11.2011 13:52

Russia need so stop with almost always half measure statements and make bold statement and draw a line on the sands and let NATO respond with concrete measures or alas! The NATO knows only concrete positions.

+10

Undo

Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us