Nordic military alliance to challenge Russia in Arctic
Published: 10 February, 2009, 04:19
Edited: 26 March, 2010, 14:22
New Danish Knud Rasmussen class Arctic patrol vessel
TAGS: Global warming, Military, NATO, Russia, Politics, Europe
Four Scandinavian countries together with Iceland could form a Nordic military alliance to protect their interests in Arctic, says a report presented by Norway at a special meeting of the countries’ foreign ministers.
The report presented by a veteran Norwegian politician Thorvald Stoltenberg proposes co-operation not limited to a joint military force, but also includes potential joint efforts in international security, air surveillance, air patrols, maritime monitoring and medical services. The report also calls for an independent polar orbit satellite system by 2020.
The interesting fact about the Scandinavian Defence Union, which could unite Denmark, Finland,
Nordic countries
Denmark (with Greenland and Faroe Islands)
Finland (with Aaland Islands)
Iceland
Norway
Sweden
Norway, Sweden and Iceland, is that it was supposed to be born immediately after WWII. The Scandinavian four were positive the union was absolutely essential to guard against possible future common threats from the Soviet Union, for example. But the birth of North Atlantic Treaty Organisation superseded these plans.
Today, Denmark and Norway (which were occupied by Nazi Germany during WWll, thus having learnt a bitter lesson) together with Iceland are already members of the NATO alliance, while Finland, which bravely fought both Soviet Union and Nazi Germany in sequence during the WWII and Sweden, which miraculously managed to escape the horrors of war, have so far preferred to stay militarily unengaged.
Now Stoltenberg has proposed pooling efforts and resources in all possible military areas, as well as
Thorvald Stoltenberg
is one of the most experienced Norwegian politicians and has held a wide number of posts in Norway (Stoltenberg is a former Norwegian Defence Minister and Foreign Minister), the UN and Norwegian Red Cross.
civil co-operation to ensure the effective maritime monitoring of the North Atlantic, and contiguous areas of the Arctic Ocean and Barents Sea (the so-called “Barents Watch”). The report also mentions the necessity of a “Baltic Watch”.
A mutual declaration of solidarity in key areas of joint foreign policy and a common disaster response unit are planned to deal with any disastrous events.
For Russia formation of the Nordic Alliance could possibly mean that it will be able to speak directly to the Arctic countries, thus by-passing NATO, for 60 years now wholly controlled by the US, which in turn could mean that purely economic interests would prevail. However, this is only if the US does not enter the new organisation, because, strangely enough, it has Arctic territories too.
Can Israel afford a lurch to the right?In a “what the hell” moment in Israeli politics, citizens voting in Tuesday’s national elections will turn away from compromise with the Arabs, polls predict, and opt instead for blunt confrontation. |
Wrangle over gas contract heats upUkraine’s President Yushchenko and Prime Minister Timoshenko have clashed in a PR wrestling match over the gas transit contracts with Russia. |
@ E. Uusikvi, thanks for the insights. To the outsiders this really looks very much like NATO expansion into the countries that are currently outside the military alliance. However, with or without NATO, it is troublesome that Western countries can think only in the terms of military alliances. Is it possible that there are other ways of approaching the fleshing out of the UN Convention on the Laws of the Sea? I am sure, that given some time, all parties would find a good way to implement the law, to everyone's satisfaction. Just because US does not want to ratify the Convention, it does not mean it does not exist. In fact, since the majority of UN members have ratified it, it is the law. It gives countries by far better deal in having a say in their priviledged economic zones, but it limits the presence of military traffic to only one approved by the authorities. While it curtails the rights of some countries' militaries to get into the priviledged economic zone, it also makes sure that the rights are clear about the exploitation. What is this alliance supposed to achieve? Deny Russia its priviledged economic zone, just because US does not like it? The countries of the region would be better served to mind their own business, and secure their interests along with Russia's. And not getting roped into "purchasing military equipment together". O, what a savings. Door to door salesman would do better then that. How about just not buying what you do not need??












Scandinavia is Denmark, Norway and Sweden. Scandinavia plus Finland and Iceland constitute the five Nordic Countries. Finland is not in Scandinavia.