The article correlates with today’s “Spin-a-war” by Evgeny Belenkiy, RT. Simply the word “war” stays for a set of meanings condensed in Clausewitz’s works and explains the state of politics between militarily balanced sovereign states. The last war older people remember was WW II. It entirely terminated at Hiroshima where the sovereign conflict was completed down the backlash of the horror of nuclear blast. What we globally encounter today is pure murder killing, which is allowing transgression of sovereignty into “rough states”. Balkans today is the result of Tito’s Yugoslavia legacy. The only people among us who were having a true evolving sovereign experience – were Serbs who anchored the pillar of political coherence. Losing this pivotal dynamics the new fractured states only aligned on the eternal Western pay roll being the final “creativity” of political illusory elites. We are organized as useless in entirety. In order to cope with the situation – the people have to dig into their deeper primordial Slavic identity. There rests their peaceful stratum before being occupied by institutional religions. Balkans will always linger to join West and always stay open to the voice of authority bouncing in their soul from Russia. To synchronize the fundamental vectors on Balkans, Serbs will follow the longing for sovereignty within or without the independencies of their environment. Simply the new creative charisma is expected to erupt from Tito’s trash.

Thank you, Rikard, for this excellent summary.

is this guy for real or is he smelling the doom of RS and now is trying to gain some russian support.....

The Republic of Srpska is a constitutional part of B&H. "Bosnia and Herzegovina shall consist of the two Entities, the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Republika Srpska (hereinafter "the Entities")" (Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina: I, 3; http://www.state.gov/www/regions/eur/bosnia/dayann4.html). Today, there is a constant pressure to change this, since the ethnic muslims (who have called themselves "Bosnians" or "Bosniaks" since around 1990) who are just below 50% of the total population (they utterly oppose any census with ethnic elements so the results are based on 1991 census) want their own state where they would be the ultimate rulers. The idea is not new. Before the war, muslim representatives in the B&H Parliament, with the support of some Croats, outvoted others (the Serbs) and declared the independence from SFRJ (Yugoslavia). However, this was illegitimate since there were 3 constitutional peoples (and still are): Serbian, Croatian and Muslim. This also led to the situation where Serbs had to defend themselves from paramilitary forces. The collective memory warned against the catastrophe like the one from WW2 when over a million of Serbs (vast majority of which were civilians) were brutally murdered mainly by Croats and Muslims. Serbs in B&H established The Republic of Srpska which is now home to hundreds of thousands of Serbs banished from the other parts of B&H and Croatia (where they had also been constitutional nation). We should not generalize, but whatever the story they tell you, it all comes to the same. Should either Bosniaks, or "citizens", as they like to say, were given to rule, it would certainly oppose any ethnic dialogue and set the autocratic regime of false democracy. This would certainly cause violent inter-ethnic clashes. The Republic of Srpska is, therefore, the most important guarantee of stability in B&H and should be respected and appreciated as such. May the peace be forever.