VERSIONS: روسيا اليوم NOTICIAS FREEVIDEO ИНОТВ RTД FIND US ON: YouTube Twitter
breakingnews
Go to main page   Politics   ROAR: “Georgia has no levers to punish Chavez”  
MORE ON THE STORY
Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez (RIA Novosti / Sergey Guneev) 15.10.2010, 18:08 4 comments

Hugo Chavez gives exclusive interview to RT

Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez has given an exclusive live interview to RT's Spanish channel while on a visit to Moscow. Chavez shared his views on the current world order and his hopes for the future.

Vladimir Kremlev for RT 12.02.2010, 14:26 7 comments

ROAR: “Cuba may occupy a new place in world architecture”

Moscow will continue to strengthen “balanced relations” with Central American countries despite Washington’s “suspicions”, analysts say.

15.04.2010, 15:14 3 comments

ROAR: Russia strengthens ties with Argentina, BRIC partners

The Russian president has visited Argentina and is attending the BRIC Summit in Brazil, further strengthening Russia’s presence in South America.

Vladimir Kremlev for RT 10.09.2009, 14:31 1 comment

ROAR: Chavez, Russia’s “comrade-in-arms and oil”

Moscow continues to support the Venezuelan leader who is facing more problems at home, analysts say.

02.04.2010, 18:22 9 comments

Putin plays his hand in Venezuela

President Hugo Chavez is hosting Prime Minister Vladimir Putin on Friday for meetings that will seal an assortment of lucrative deals – as well as raise some eyebrows in Washington.

25.09.2009, 15:11 3 comments

Who stole the spotlight at UN?

Words are mightier than swords when it comes to some world leaders who spoke at the UN this week. The charisma of the political figures many love to hate is stealing the spotlight from their more diplomatic colleagues.

Hugo Chavez (AFP Photo / Prensa Miraflores - Marcelo Garcia) 14.10.2010, 01:17 2 comments

Venezuela’s poor awakened by revolutionary process

Democracy 101, Venezuela style: There is a people’s revolution underway. What is indisputable is that it never would have happened without President Hugo Chavez coming to power.

Image from nologo.su 24.09.2010, 23:10 1 comment

Opposition, pro-Chavez parties battle in upcoming election

It's an outstanding view from the top of one of the finest hotels in Caracas, Venezuela. But on the ground, there is a different reality.

22.07.2010, 11:09 2 comments

ROAR: “Mysteries surround Luis Corvalan’s life story”

Both the personality and fate of the legendary former General Secretary of the Chilean Communist party, Luis Corvalan, are full of mystical stories and enigmas, the media say.

07.10.2010, 08:17 16 comments

It’s official: RT is the enemy

The Chairman of the Broadcasting Board of Governors, overseeing US media directed at foreign audiences, says his organization needs more money to fight its enemies. Namely, Russia, Iran, Venezuela and China.

ROAR: “Georgia has no levers to punish Chavez”

Published: 11 September, 2009, 16:12
Edited: 06 January, 2010, 02:52

Vladimir Kremlev for RT

Vladimir Kremlev for RT

TAGS: Russia, South America, ROAR, Politics, Chavez


More countries may recognize the independence of Abkhazia and South Ossetia following Hugo Chavez’s example, Russian observers think.

During his visit to Moscow Chavez announced that Venezuela had “joined the recognition of independence” of the two republics.

Despite the fact that Chavez is known for supporting Russia’s foreign policy, many observers did not expect him to speak about the recognition during this trip to Moscow. Some Russian papers even explained that this move would be dangerous for him because of separatist sentiments in several Venezuelan provinces.

At the same time, the controversial Latin American leader’s decision came as a long-awaited surprise. “Only Russia, as an initiator of the process of the recognition and such anti-American leaders as Daniel Ortega of Nicaragua and Hugo Chavez could make this move,” Aleksey Makarkin, vice president of the Center for Political Technologies, said.

“The US could also expect the Venezuelan leader to make this step,” Makarkin told RT. “Chavez has already violently scolded America so many times and said absolutely politically incorrect words about Israel’s policies,” the analyst added.

Chavez is acting as a strong leader, and his latest world tour should demonstrate to Latin Americans that he is respected in other parts of the world, Makarkin said. “Chavez is acting as Fidel Castro’s successor in Latin America, and he is playing this part with passion,” he added.

Makarkin believes that Chavez’s decision to recognize former Georgian republics was “first of all his reaction to the increase in military cooperation between the US and Colombia.” Americans are strengthening ties with the government of Colombia and other “moderate” regimes in South American countries such as Chile and Brazil, the analyst said. “And Washington will try to isolate Chavez,” he added.

Chavez’s move has infuriated many politicians in Georgia. They also believe the recognition of the two republics will send the Venezuelan leader to further political isolation. Russian analysts, however, doubt that Tbilisi will take revenge on Chavez for this step.

Georgia has no capabilities to retaliate, as well as being unable “to defend its territorial integrity, as [President Mikheil] Saakashvili put it,” Evgenia Voyko, analyst at the Center of Political Conjuncture, believes.

All Georgia’s threats will take the form of “usual appeals to the international community to restore justice,” Voyko told Gazeta daily. “But I doubt that this could somehow frighten Hugo Chavez,” she added.

Voyko believes that Chavez’s move “was not really surprising because he has long positioned himself as Russia’s friend.” A year ago Chavez supported Moscow’s decision to recognize the sovereignty of Abkhazia and South Ossetia, she noted. “So it is only naturally that he himself has recognized their independence,” the analyst added.

Voyko stressed that “the surprise and effect would have been stronger if one of the European countries had done the same.” And now one could expect strident rhetoric from Georgia, the US and Europe, but without taking other steps, she said.

At the same time the analyst said that Tbilisi may consider “recalling its ambassador” from Venezuela. “But Chavez has got used to severing relations with other countries,” she added. “This concrete case is unlikely to scare Caracas.”

Fedor Lukyanov, editor-in-chief of Russia in Global Affairs magazine, also believes that Georgia may sever relations with Venezuela. But Caracas and Tbilisi have no ties that “could be important to them [Venezuela],” he told Gazeta.

Kommersant daily writes that Chavez’s decision to recognize the two republics “has surprised” Russian President Dmitry Medvedev. The paper also asks what price Moscow will have to pay for this move.

“Many of yesterday’s agreements [between Russia and Venezuela] could hardly be considered something other than gratitude, and very generous at that,” the paper said. The agreements concern the activities of Russian oil companies in Venezuela.

Chavez promised to use Venezuela’s influence in Latin America to urge other countries to recognize the former Georgian republics. “Taking into consideration the scale of Russia’s assistance to Venezuela and Nicaragua…it is not ruled out that Abkhazia and South Ossetia may actually expect a series of decisions about the recognition,” Kommersant wrote. “There are many regimes on the world map which do not cooperate with the US and are experiencing financial difficulties because of the crisis,” the paper added.

Another daily, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, called Chavez’s promise to recognize the two republics “the sensation of the visit.” Aleksey Arbatov, head of the Center of International Security at the Institute of World Economy and International Relations, told the paper that it was important for Chavez to strengthen ties with Moscow.

Military and technical cooperation is the most important issue in relations between Venezuela and Russia, Arbatov said. “At the same time we want to demonstrate [to Washington] that we can find allies quite near the US,” he added. “[The Americans] are also seeking allies quite near us, and even want to enlarge NATO.”

However, Arbatov called Chavez’s move “a clear PR exercise, because none of our allies in the Commonwealth of Independent States (the CIS) or the Collective Security Treaty Organization (the CSTO) has recognized [the republics], not to mention NATO.”

“It is a very delicate topic for us and a big problem,” Arbatov said. “We cannot secure recognition from those who are really important for us in the CIS, CSTO, the Organization for Security and Cooperation n Europe,” the analyst added.

Dmitry Badovsky, deputy director of the Social Systems Institute believes, to the contrary, that “even symbolic” enlargement of the circle of countries that recognize the two republics is very important, first of all for Abkhazia and South Ossetia.

“One could expect this from Venezuela,” Badovsky told Nezavisimaya Gazeta. Nicaragua has been another Latin American state to recognize the republics, Badovsky noted. It is clear that if countries from a certain region have joined the recognition, “one may also expect the continuation of this process,” he said.

The director of the Institute of Latin America at the Russian Academy of Sciences agrees with this statement. Chavez’s decision may give a signal “to other countries which are critical of the US and are interested in friendly ties and partnership with Russia,” he told Kommersant.

Venezuela is actively developing relations not only with Russia, but also with Belarus, Badovsky said. The recognition of the republics by Minsk is very important for Russia, he added. Chavez’s decision “may somehow influence the position of Belarus,” he said.

Mikhail Margelov, head of the Federation Council’s Committee on International Affairs, believes it is not important any more which country will follow Venezuela and recognize Abkhazia and South Ossetia.

These republics have already been recognized by three countries, which is a [relative] multitude, Margelov told Kommersant. The argument that only two states have recognized Abkhazia and South Ossetia “has been refuted,” he said.

Sergey Borisov, RT

+8 (11 votes)
 
Back to top
next MORE NEWS
11.09.2009, 11:34

GQ’s conspiracy “revelations” – much ado about nothing

“The GQ article about Putin is crap”, said PM’s press attaché Dmitry Peskov. The comments were made about a GQ feature in the September American edition of the magazine.

11.09.2009, 17:16 2 comments

Putin’s plan – a strong democratic hand

Five years ago, Vladimir Putin announced a reform of election law. This elapsed period allows us to make the first conclusions about the effectiveness of the reforms and also have a deeper look at the motives for them.

Nicolas Peucelle January 05, 2010, 18:54
0

About seperatism: Maybe it can be a smart way to get rid of undesirable folks.. to just concentrate them in parts of the country, and than have them declare their independance. This may be in some situations a kind of healing for a state. (No more pensions, healthcare, any support.. notjing! Good bye! Maybe.. the poursuit of territorial "integrity" as a pure geographical concept may be leading to "shizophrenic statehood" with obvious bad effects on the "mental stability" of a nation. Maybe some Presidents and their supporters will just have to educate their poeple about a new way of considering what is good and bad for a country... Because to get rid of "undesirables" in large numbers can be the best way to make the rest of the population very happy. Things may change over the centuries, as we know, and geographical borders more easy remodeled than peoples minds, especialy when they are a majority of idiots.

Zak September 16, 2009, 16:51
0

You said it all Bianca!Well done! I will add: It is proofen - by experts, without any doubt, that Jewish people (in last 3000 years-when they come from Egypt) never heve a state in today modern Israel-as they claim!They live free as minority, in international recognized Palestine till 1947-48 when they by force (with help of west) unlawfully grab Palestine land and state!Mr.Chavez comments are correct!Palestine people are modern "indians"!That ever Jewish people suffer in hands of nazis, they done 10 times more to innorcent Palestine nation-a PURE GENOCIDE! Abkhazia and S.Ossetia are bound to valid law sign by Georgia(as part of SSSR) on referendum and free choice to be independent or remain part of Georgia!Kosovo case is different one!In 1935 in Kosovo and Metohia live 84% OF SERBS BY ANY DEMOGRAFIC MAP(ENGLISH AND OTHERS) AT THAT TIME! Many of those today Kosovo people come in Kosovo - 100000 of them from Albania after 2 world war!Kosovo is heart of Serbian state for 1000 years! With fake excuses, west call Kosovo a "cpecial case" but the truth is: Serbia is still only state in modern times where UN chapter no.1-which garant teritorial integrity, to all members -and all international law are break as is case of resolution 1244!West wage unlawfull war against Serbia to stole and make(you are correct) fiirst ever build NATO state!Kosovo is punishment for Serbia(offer was on Serbian table to keep Kosovo- or) wich did not want TO BECOME A NATO MEMBER!Kosovo case is not over for sure-"cpecial case" will become a main reason for future 3 war war!Serbian Church leader said"We wait 500 years to free Kosovo from Otomans-this new barabarians wont last 100 years!"Western hipocricy got no limit!

Bianca September 11, 2009, 16:46
0

The story seems unbalanced, and at times, dubious. Mr. Makarkin, from the Center for Political Technologies, apparently believes that one of the political technologies is to force people to speak politically correct language. And by stating tht Mr. Chavez used politically incorrect language towards Israel is supposed to prove what? I do not see any connection. Many countries have criticized Israel's policies in the Middle East, and many more have been appaled by the extent of war crimes committed in Gaza. It is also not exactly imformative to dwell on the lack of recognition by the countries of EU, or even CIS. EU is all wrapped up into the mess they made in Kosovo, and the mess is not going away. And this would have been by far more revealing discussion on the issue of separatism. US and EU recognized the independence of a Serbian province, Kosovo. This has happened while UN has been administering the province under Resolution 1244, and its governing document, the consitutional framework. Legally and historically, the province was never anything but part of Serbia. In fact, this is where the medieval Serbia had its roots. The full name of Kosovo is Kosovo and Metohia, which really means church lands. US and EU took advantage of the changed demographics in Kosovo, to encourage the Albanian population to seek independence. UN was made an accomplice in the act, bringing shame to UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon. He acted irresponsibly by not acting to enforce the Resolution. He simply abdicated, and tried to pass a buck by trying to make UN SC solve his administrative mess. It would have been very helpfull if the differences between Kosovo and Abkhazia/South Ossetia were analyzed. This would help understand how Kosovo's precedent damaged the international law. The discussion of sovereignty, self-determination and legal grounds for separation are the topics that require real legal attention!