ROAR: “Iran is interested in cooperation with Russia despite sanctions”
Published: 10 June, 2010, 16:45
Edited: 01 July, 2010, 17:39
TAGS: Arms, Nuclear, UN, Russia, ROAR, Politics, Iran
Tehran may react differently to Russia’s and China’s support for the fourth round of sanctions adopted by the UN Security Council, analysts say.
Thanks to Moscow and Beijing, Tehran has avoided “paralyzing sanctions,” Nezavisimaya Gazeta daily said in an article titled “The fourth punishment for Iran”. The international community “once again demanded that Iran stops its activities in the nuclear sphere and offered particular benefits for this step,” the paper noted.
If Iran disobeys, in three months the Security Council may consider new measures. However, judging by the statements of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, one cannot expect “a positive reaction” from him, the paper said.
As a result, the US may toughen its own sanctions against Tehran. And the European Union on June 20 will start to develop its measures too, Vedomosti daily said. However, analysts still question the effectiveness of such sanctions. It is too low, and may only slow down the development of the Iranian nuclear program, but will not lead to a complete stop, the paper noted.
“The new sanctions are a good reason for the Iranian regime to mobilize the population,” Georgy Mirsky of the Institute of World Economy and International Relations told the paper.
“If the Security Council’s member states had wanted to deal Tehran a serious blow they would have agreed on the ban on buying oil from Iran and would impose an embargo on the export of petroleum to that country,” Mirsky told Rosbalt news agency. “It would be an effective measure that could put Iran in a difficult position,” he said, adding that the new sanctions are “fairly mild.”
They will bring Tehran “certain problems in financial sphere, trade and economy, but it will not be too difficult for the country to go through them,” the analyst said. The Iranian authorities may try to play an internal political card, using the issue of an external threat, he noted.
As for Russia’s decision to support the sanctions, Moscow “has left the number of countries which are friendly to Iran and has become one of neutral states,” believes Rajab Safarov, director of the Center for Contemporary Iranian Studies. “This will have a negative effect on bilateral cooperation,” he told Vedomosti.
Moscow considered it necessary to support the anti-Iranian resolution “against a background of the reset of relations with the US leadership," RBC daily said. “For China, which has close political and, most importantly, economic relations with Iran, such a move will not bring many problems,” the paper noted. “But it will seriously affect not very easy Russian-Iranian relations.”
“Iran will not quarrel with China whose market is too important for Tehran,” Evgeny Satanovsky, president of the Institute of the Middle East Studies, told the paper. Russia is important for Iran “only in two aspects, as a supplier of technologies and defense equipment, and as a cover on the international arena,” he said.
However, Russia will not argue with the West over Iran now, the analyst said. And Iran has many historic and political claims to Russia, he added.
The main result of toughening sanctions may be strengthening positions of the Iranian leadership inside the country. “Tehran has received another confirmation of the existence of an external enemy embodied by the West, and first of all, the US,” RBC daily said.
“Taking into account the aggravation of the situation in the Middle East (the events around the Gaza Strip), Iran may again try to play a part of the leader of anti-Israel and anti-American movement in the region,” the paper noted.
“And if the adopted sanctions do not bring serious economic effect, then the international community will not have any serious non-military methods of pressure on Tehran,” the daily said.
The Iranian president will get as much as possible from the sanctions in his internal policy, Satanovsky believes. “However, Ahmadinejad is wrong in saying that sanctions will not bring any problems for Iran,” he said.
“It is another matter that no sanctions will stop the Iranian nuclear program,” the analyst noted, adding that any other leader would continue this program.
“The nervous discussion about the Iranian nuclear program has been continuing for six years,” NTV news channel said. “And sanctions have been toughened over four years,” it added.
The new sanctions are “not only more serious than the previous ones,” the channel noted. “More important is not what will be banned but who will do it and how,” it added. “Only Turkey and Brazil voted against the sanctions, but the main players, including Russia and China, supported them.”
The Iranian leader had called on Moscow and Beijing not to support Tehran’s “Western enemies” and to block the resolution. But Russia and China “have already done everything so that ordinary Iranians do not suffer from the sanctions,” the channel said, adding that all the countries have “limits of patience.”
Now the world will wait for Iran’s next steps, the channel said. “However, Tehran has already warned that it may respond with severing ties with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and to stop discussing its nuclear program,” it added.
These are the things absolutely contrary to what other countries want, the channel said. It was expected, and now there are expectations that “bargaining will be continued,” it noted.
At the same time, Iranians do not have many levers to influence Russia’s position, some analysts say. They even cannot stop projects with Russia because, “in fact, there are no contracts for building new nuclear plants or developing new oilfields,” said Nina Mamedova of the Institute of Oriental Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences.
Tehran will hardly stop cooperation with Russia in a military and technical field, as well as oil swap deals, Mamedova told Vremya Novostey daily. “Iran is interested in cooperation with Russia because it gives Tehran what it really needs,” she said.
Sergey Borisov,
Russian Opinion and Analysis Review,
RT
10.06.2010, 14:06
6 comments
Russia will continue with Iranian missile contractRussia’s Federal Service for Military-Industrial Cooperation informed reporters on Thursday that Russia will continue work on the contract to supply the S300 anti-aircraft missile systems to Iran. |
10.06.2010, 23:00
49 comments
Hungary equates Communism to NazismHungarian lawmakers have passed a bill equating Communist era crimes to the Holocaust and banned denying it under threat of imprisonment. |
The problem is, Iran threatens people in their international speeches. Also the rest of the world wants to make sure that Iran is truly secure. There has been a problem with extreme Muslims trying to kill people for a while in an unhonorable fashion. Russia, the US, and other countries have all felt this extreme form of attack. So all the countries with true freedom of religion and where religion plays little to no part in politics, truly understand what a human who does not believe in their country, their family, and then the divine can do; as extreme Muslims place their religion before everything else. This means that when it comes to their children or their religion, the extreme Muslims will place their religion first. It seems to me that if Iran was a more humble state they would probably be greeted with a better international reception. As of now, it is propagated heavily inside of Iran from what I have read, that non Muslims are highly disliked and the laws of Iran are even governed highly by such distain for freedom of views. I do not know as I have never been to Iran. I believe that if Iran where to take a more humble approach and just allow the international world to come in and help them with their nuclear reactors that tensions in Iran would ease for the international world. In the US we have no hatred for Muslims or those who wish to believe in Mohammad’s books. In the US we have many books, even religions books pre-dating Moses and Jesus, as Mohammad makes reference to being enlightened after Jesus. Iran should say ok, come hang out with us. We like you, you like us and we will learn together. Not Iran hates you and no you cannot help.
It looks as if Russia made a deal whreby the yanks do not deploy antiballistic missiles near its borders.and the russians become the fig leaf for the attack that is being prepared against iran. What is in the cards is a yugoslavia type campaign against iranian infrastructure with the purpose of changing iranian regime. This is not going to work. S Hussain fought against iran for 9 years and could not change the system. This is probably the gravest blunder of russian foreigm policy since the dissolution of the USSR. If a hostile regime prevails in Tehran,hundreds of years of good relations between Russia and Persia will come to an end.












Presstv.ir has already reported a flotilla of 12 warships, one of them being an Aircraft Carrier, US and Israeli have passed through the Suez canal into the Red Sea and supposedly heading for the Persian Gulf. Recently it was already reported that Saudi Arabia were prepared to shut down their radar systems to allow the overflight of Israeli Fighter bombers over their territory to Iran. Reason, they have some sort of hatred for Iran. The Bashir Nuclear Reactor is near the Persian Gulf, and Israel has long now been threatening to bomb it out of existence, regardless of the consequences for the civilian population in its vicinity. Recently Russia has openly stated that the delivery of the S-300 system has been frozen, which really means canceled as it would contravene the sanctions under offensive weapons. That is odd, it is supposed to be a defensive weapon to knock out offensive incoming missiles and aircraft. So what is the difference between offensive and defensive? Is a missile attack on Iran from the Red Sea or somewhere in the Persian Gulf an offensive act against Iran, from US and Israeli warships offensive or defensive? Is an act of self defense by the Iranian armed forces against such an attack offensive or defensive? It is clear that the delivery of the S-300 system has been canceled for one reason, to to enable an air attack on Iran from US and Israeli naval ships, or directly from Israel itself, flying over Saudi Arabia. Either way the situation has become extremely grave, and Russian and Chinese support for sanctions against Iran is a slap in the face to the Iranian people. It is very similar to the time when Bush pushed for sanctions and used it as an excuse to invade Iraq. The result, Iraq is now little more than a failed state, or on the verge of being such. This area of the world is so blood soaked from US and Israeli aggression that more blood letting is madness in itself and produces nothing. Beware the ides of march.